How Do Terms of Service Influence Social Media User Dynamics from A Privacy Anxiety Perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16414v1
• Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 03:37:20 GMT
• Title: How Do Terms of Service Influence Social Media User Dynamics from A Privacy Anxiety Perspective
• Abstract summary: This study examines how a Terms of Service update on X enabling default AI training on user content activated privacy anxiety and reshaped user behavior.<n>The study finds that privacy anxiety is activated within creator communities and diffused across user groups through inter- and cross- community interaction.
• Score: 8.119041322912375
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This study examines how a Terms of Service update on X enabling default AI training on user content activated privacy anxiety and reshaped user behavior. Privacy anxiety is conceptualized as a structural outcome of reduced control over data use, particularly among content creators. The study finds that privacy anxiety is activated within creator communities and diffused across user groups through inter- and cross- community interaction. As anxiety escalated, engagement declined and migration intentions increased. These findings point to an unresolved dilemma in AI-driven platform governance: how user trust and autonomy can be sustained under conditions of concentrated power and data-dependent business models remains unclear.

Related papers

• Using AI Agents to Automate Black-Box Audits of Personalization Algorithms at Scale [76.72846830885882]
  Personalization algorithms determine what content users encounter on online platforms.<n> auditing these systems is difficult because independent auditors have only black-box access to the algorithms.<n>We introduce a framework for black-box audits of personalization algorithms using generative AI agents as behavioral engines for synthetic accounts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-29T18:25:09Z)
• Intimacy as Service, Harm as Externality: Critical Perspectives on AI Companion Platform Accountability [0.0]
  This paper examines artificial intelligence (AI) companionship as a site where intimate relations are simultaneously produced, extracted from, and governed through datafied systems.<n>Through in-depth interviews with 20 individuals who have AI companions, we address three questions: what harms do users identify, how do they make sense of those harms, and what do their accounts reveal about the perceived distribution of responsibility among users, platforms, and regulators.<n>The findings extend responsibilization theory by demonstrating how platform-produced vulnerability becomes self-sustaining through the interpretive labor of users who lack structural alternatives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-07T19:11:54Z)
• Contextualized Privacy Defense for LLM Agents [84.30907378390512]
  LLM agents increasingly act on users' personal information, yet existing privacy defenses remain limited in both design and adaptability.<n>We propose Contextualized Defense Instructing (CDI), a new privacy defense paradigm.<n>We show that our CDI consistently achieves a better balance between privacy preservation (94.2%) and helpfulness (80.6%) than baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T13:35:33Z)
• From Defense to Advocacy: Empowering Users to Leverage the Blind Spot of AI Inference [0.0]
  Most privacy regulations function as a passive defensive shield that users must wield themselves.<n>As organizations increasingly use AI to make inferences, the rapid expansion of Blind Self emerges as a critical challenge.<n>Building on the theory of Contextual Integrity, we propose a paradigm shift from defensive privacy management to proactive privacy advocacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T22:42:27Z)
• Autonomy Matters: A Study on Personalization-Privacy Dilemma in LLM Agents [16.263298954758323]
  We study how agent's autonomy level and personalization influence users' privacy concerns, trust and willingness to use.<n>We find that personalization without considering users' privacy preferences increases privacy concerns and decreases trust and willingness to use.<n>Our results suggest that rather than aiming for perfect model alignment in output generation, balancing autonomy of agent's action and user control offers a promising path to mitigate the personalization-privacy dilemma.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T03:38:54Z)
• Understanding Users' Security and Privacy Concerns and Attitudes Towards Conversational AI Platforms [3.789219860006095]
  We conduct a large-scale analysis of over 2.5M user posts from the r/ChatGPT Reddit community to understand users' security and privacy concerns.<n>We find that users are concerned about each stage of the data lifecycle (i.e., collection, usage, and retention)<n>We provide recommendations for users, platforms, enterprises, and policymakers to enhance transparency, improve data controls, and increase user trust and adoption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T03:22:48Z)
• Trust and Friction: Negotiating How Information Flows Through Decentralized Social Media [1.1306212771477646]
  Decentralized social media protocols enable users in independent, user-hosted servers to interact with each other while they self-govern.<n>This community-based model of social media governance opens up new opportunities for tailored decision-making about information flows.<n>We conducted a semi-structured interview with 23 users of the Fediverse, a decentralized social media network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T00:29:32Z)
• MisinfoEval: Generative AI in the Era of "Alternative Facts" [50.069577397751175]
  We introduce a framework for generating and evaluating large language model (LLM) based misinformation interventions. We present (1) an experiment with a simulated social media environment to measure effectiveness of misinformation interventions, and (2) a second experiment with personalized explanations tailored to the demographics and beliefs of users. Our findings confirm that LLM-based interventions are highly effective at correcting user behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T18:16:50Z)
• Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach [61.04606493712002]
  Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in unverifiable claims that is not observable. Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported beliefs. We propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T07:22:56Z)
• Protecting User Privacy in Online Settings via Supervised Learning [69.38374877559423]
  We design an intelligent approach to online privacy protection that leverages supervised learning. By detecting and blocking data collection that might infringe on a user's privacy, we can restore a degree of digital privacy to the user.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T05:20:16Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment: the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
  This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic. We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content. Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z)
• Quantifying the Vulnerabilities of the Online Public Square to Adversarial Manipulation Tactics [43.98568073610101]
  We use a social media model to quantify the impacts of several adversarial manipulation tactics on the quality of content. We find that the presence of influential accounts, a hallmark of social media, exacerbates the vulnerabilities of online communities to manipulation. These insights suggest countermeasures that platforms could employ to increase the resilience of social media users to manipulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-07-13T21:12:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.