STRIDE: Strategic Iterative Decision-Making for Retrieval-Augmented Multi-Hop Question Answering
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17405v1
- Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2026 12:19:43 GMT
- Title: STRIDE: Strategic Iterative Decision-Making for Retrieval-Augmented Multi-Hop Question Answering
- Abstract summary: Multi-hop question answering (MHQA) enables accurate answers to complex queries by retrieving and reasoning over evidence dispersed across multiple documents.<n>Existing MHQA approaches mainly rely on iterative retrieval-augmented generation, which suffer from the following two major issues.<n>We propose STRIDE, a framework that separates strategic planning, dynamic control, and grounded execution.
- Score: 9.69666629029613
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Multi-hop question answering (MHQA) enables accurate answers to complex queries by retrieving and reasoning over evidence dispersed across multiple documents. Existing MHQA approaches mainly rely on iterative retrieval-augmented generation, which suffer from the following two major issues. 1) Existing methods prematurely commit to surface-level entities rather than underlying reasoning structures, making question decomposition highly vulnerable to lexical ambiguity. 2) Existing methods overlook the logical dependencies among reasoning steps, resulting in uncoordinated execution. To address these issues, we propose STRIDE, a framework that separates strategic planning, dynamic control, and grounded execution. At its core, a Meta-Planner first constructs an entity-agnostic reasoning skeleton to capture the abstract logic of the query, thereby deferring entity grounding until after the reasoning structure is established, which mitigates disambiguation errors caused by premature lexical commitment. A Supervisor then orchestrates sub-question execution in a dependency-aware manner, enabling efficient parallelization where possible and sequential coordination when necessary. By dynamically deciding whether to retrieve new evidence or infer from existing facts, it avoids redundant queries and error propagation, while fusing cross-branch information and reformulating failed queries to enhance robustness. Grounded fact extraction and logical inference are delegated to specialized execution modules, ensuring faithfulness through explicit separation of retrieval and reasoning. We further propose STRIDE-FT, a modular fine-tuning framework that uses self-generated execution trajectories from STRIDE, requiring neither human annotations nor stronger teacher models. Experiments show that STRIDE achieves robust and accurate reasoning, while STRIDE-FT effectively enhances open-source LLMs.
Related papers
- Deep Reasoning in General Purpose Agents via Structured Meta-Cognition [58.185853639335896]
We introduce an inference-time approach for constructing task-specific scaffolds through structured meta-reasoning.<n>We instantiate this approach in a general-purpose agent that distributes complex tasks across more controlled reasoning threads.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-12T01:21:37Z) - One Refiner to Unlock Them All: Inference-Time Reasoning Elicitation via Reinforcement Query Refinement [37.27419953581617]
Large Language Models (LLMs) often fail to utilize their latent reasoning capabilities.<n>We propose ReQueR, a modular framework that treats reasoning elicitation as an inference-time alignment task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-28T09:52:21Z) - The Unlearning Mirage: A Dynamic Framework for Evaluating LLM Unlearning [54.67958855362658]
We propose a dynamic framework that stress tests unlearning using complex structured queries.<n>Our approach first elicits knowledge from the target model (pre-unlearning) and constructs targeted probes, ranging from simple queries to multi-hop chains.<n>Our framework enables practical and scalable evaluation of unlearning methods without the need for manual construction of forget test sets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-11T19:51:33Z) - ROG: Retrieval-Augmented LLM Reasoning for Complex First-Order Queries over Knowledge Graphs [14.25887925588904]
We propose a retrieval-augmented framework that combines query-aware neighborhood retrieval with large language model (LLM) chain-of-thought reasoning.<n>ROG decomposes a multi-operator query into a sequence of single-operator sub-queries.<n> Intermediate answer sets are cached and reused across steps, improving consistency on deep reasoning chains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-02T17:45:43Z) - CoT-Seg: Rethinking Segmentation with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning and Self-Correction [50.67483317563736]
This paper aims to explore a system that can think step-by-step, look up information if needed, generate results, self-evaluate its own results, and refine the results.<n>We introduce CoT-Seg, a training-free framework that rethinks reasoning segmentation by combining chain-of-thought reasoning with self-correction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-24T11:41:54Z) - CoG: Controllable Graph Reasoning via Relational Blueprints and Failure-Aware Refinement over Knowledge Graphs [53.199517625701475]
CoG is a training-free framework inspired by Dual-Process Theory that mimics the interplay between intuition and deliberation.<n>CoG significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in both accuracy and efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-16T07:27:40Z) - Query, Decompose, Compress: Structured Query Expansion for Efficient Multi-Hop Retrieval [19.37201042661162]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been increasingly employed for query expansion.<n>DeCoR (Decompose and Compress for Retrieval) is a framework grounded in structured information refinement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-14T05:55:49Z) - PRISMA: Reinforcement Learning Guided Two-Stage Policy Optimization in Multi-Agent Architecture for Open-Domain Multi-Hop Question Answering [26.994531058178982]
Answering real-world open-domain questions over massive corpora is a critical challenge in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems.<n>Recent research employs reinforcement learning (RL) to end-to-end optimize the retrieval-augmented reasoning process.<n>We propose PRISMA, a decoupled-guided framework featuring a Plan-Retrieve-Inspect-Memoize architecture.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-09T01:38:38Z) - KBQA-R1: Reinforcing Large Language Models for Knowledge Base Question Answering [64.62317305868264]
We present textbfKBQA-R1, a framework that shifts the paradigm from text imitation to interaction optimization via Reinforcement Learning.<n>Treating KBQA as a multi-turn decision process, our model learns to navigate the knowledge base using a list of actions.<n>Experiments on WebQSP, GrailQA, and GraphQuestions demonstrate that KBQA-R1 achieves state-of-the-art performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-10T17:45:42Z) - Reasoning-enhanced Query Understanding through Decomposition and Interpretation [87.56450566014625]
ReDI is a Reasoning-enhanced approach for query understanding through Decomposition and Interpretation.<n>We compiled a large-scale dataset of real-world complex queries from a major search engine.<n> Experiments on BRIGHT and BEIR demonstrate that ReDI consistently surpasses strong baselines in both sparse and dense retrieval paradigms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-08T10:58:42Z) - OPERA: A Reinforcement Learning--Enhanced Orchestrated Planner-Executor Architecture for Reasoning-Oriented Multi-Hop Retrieval [23.400253066454]
Orchestrated Planner-Executor Reasoning Architecture (OPERA) is a novel reasoning-driven retrieval framework.<n>OPERA decomposes questions into sub-goals, which are executed by a Reason-Execute Module (REM) with specialized components for precise reasoning and effective retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-22T14:50:26Z) - LAG: Logic-Augmented Generation from a Cartesian Perspective [7.2022636966543745]
This paper introduces Logic-Augmented Generation (LAG), a novel paradigm that reframes knowledge augmentation through systematic question decomposition and dependency-aware reasoning.<n>Experiments on four benchmark datasets demonstrate that LAG significantly enhances reasoning robustness, reduces hallucination, and aligns LLM problem-solving with human cognition.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-07T15:42:00Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.