Understanding Human Actions through the Lens of Executable Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18064v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 10:33:18 GMT
• Title: Understanding Human Actions through the Lens of Executable Models
• Abstract summary: We introduce a domain-specific language EXACT that represents human motions as underspecified motion programs.<n>We combine individual policies into an executable neuro-symbolic model that uses program structure for compositional modelling.<n>Our results show that the use of executable action models improves data efficiency and captures intuitive relationships between actions compared with monolithic, task-specific approaches.
• Score: 15.793045896878395
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Human-centred systems require an understanding of human actions in the physical world. Temporally extended sequences of actions are intentional and structured, yet existing methods for recognising what actions are performed often do not attempt to capture their structure, particularly how the actions are executed. This, however, is crucial for assessing the quality of the action's execution and its differences from other actions. To capture the internal mechanics of actions, we introduce a domain-specific language EXACT that represents human motions as underspecified motion programs, interpreted as reward-generating functions for zero-shot policy inference using forward-backwards representations. By leveraging the compositional nature of EXACT motion programs, we combine individual policies into an executable neuro-symbolic model that uses program structure for compositional modelling. We evaluate the utility of the proposed pipeline for creating executable action models by analysing motion-capture data to understand human actions, for the tasks of human action segmentation and action anomaly detection. Our results show that the use of executable action models improves data efficiency and captures intuitive relationships between actions compared with monolithic, task-specific approaches.

Related papers

• Reading Cognition as Decisions Unfold in Words: A Factorized Inverse Decision Model [67.84198127797005]
  Inverse decision modeling infers latent properties of decision processes from observed behavior.<n>We propose a factorized inverse decision model (FIDM) that decomposes each individual's task-execution likelihood into an action factor and an effort factor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-10T07:46:13Z)
• From World Action Models to Embodied Brains: A Roadmap for Open-World Physical Intelligence [54.62791372989525]
  Action models, vision-language--action policies, and world models have advanced this goal.<n>World Action Models (WAMs) are particularly promising because they connect candidate interventions with predicted consequences.<n>We review the evolution toward WAMs and organize these limitations into three coupled gaps: model roles and representations, objectives and standardization, and system composition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-13T15:22:56Z)
• Joint Discovery of Object and Action Symbols through Effect Prediction for Robotic Manipulation Planning [1.4701783773624093]
  We propose a model that jointly discovers high-level manipulation primitives and object categories.<n>We leverage a discrete planning method that uses intermediate steps in the predicted effect trajectory to enable partial action executions.<n>We conduct experiments on tabletop repositioning and stacking tasks, and confirm that our effect-driven planning approach outperforms both a state-of-the-art method and a visual-based alternative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-22T11:58:11Z)
• Latent Action Reparameterization for Efficient Agent Inference [56.42014061367112]
  We propose a framework that learns a compact latent action space in which each latent action corresponds to a multi-step semantic behavior.<n>Unlike hand-crafted macros or hierarchical controllers, latent actions are learned from agent trajectories and integrated directly into the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T16:07:44Z)
• Joint Prediction of Human Motions and Actions in Human-Robot Collaboration [81.20389836121502]
  We introduce textsfMA-HERP, a hierarchical framework for the emphjoint estimation and prediction of human movements and actions.<n>We present a preliminary experimental evaluation based on musculoskeletal simulations of reaching movements, showing accurate motion prediction and robust action inference under noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-03T14:40:07Z)
• Humanoid Agent via Embodied Chain-of-Action Reasoning with Multimodal Foundation Models for Zero-Shot Loco-Manipulation [23.43820490179566]
  Humanoid-COA integrates foundation model reasoning with an Embodied Chain-of-Action mechanism for zero-shot loco-manipulation.<n>Our framework substantially outperforms prior baselines across manipulation, locomotion, and loco-manipulation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-13T11:37:32Z)
• ThinkBot: Embodied Instruction Following with Thought Chain Reasoning [66.09880459084901]
  Embodied Instruction Following (EIF) requires agents to complete human instruction by interacting objects in complicated surrounding environments. We propose ThinkBot that reasons the thought chain in human instruction to recover the missing action descriptions. Our ThinkBot outperforms the state-of-the-art EIF methods by a sizable margin in both success rate and execution efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-12T08:30:09Z)
• Code Models are Zero-shot Precondition Reasoners [83.8561159080672]
  We use code representations to reason about action preconditions for sequential decision making tasks. We propose a precondition-aware action sampling strategy that ensures actions predicted by a policy are consistent with preconditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T06:19:27Z)
• A Grammatical Compositional Model for Video Action Detection [24.546886938243393]
  We present a novel Grammatical Compositional Model (GCM) for action detection based on typical And-Or graphs. Our model exploits the intrinsic structures and latent relationships of actions in a hierarchical manner to harness both the compositionality of grammar models and the capability of expressing rich features of DNNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T15:24:00Z)
• Learning Intuitive Policies Using Action Features [7.260481131198059]
  We investigate the effect of network architecture on the propensity of learning algorithms to exploit semantic relationships. We find that attention-based architectures that jointly process a featurized representation of observations and actions have a better inductive bias for learning intuitive policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-29T20:54:52Z)
• Procedure Planning in Instructional Videosvia Contextual Modeling and Model-based Policy Learning [114.1830997893756]
  This work focuses on learning a model to plan goal-directed actions in real-life videos. We propose novel algorithms to model human behaviors through Bayesian Inference and model-based Imitation Learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-05T01:06:53Z)
• Learning to Abstract and Predict Human Actions [60.85905430007731]
  We model the hierarchical structure of human activities in videos and demonstrate the power of such structure in action prediction. We propose Hierarchical-Refresher-Anticipator, a multi-level neural machine that can learn the structure of human activities by observing a partial hierarchy of events and roll-out such structure into a future prediction in multiple levels of abstraction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-20T23:57:58Z)
• Human Activity Recognition based on Dynamic Spatio-Temporal Relations [10.635134217802783]
  The description of a single human action and the modeling of the evolution of successive human actions are two major issues in human activity recognition. We develop a method for human activity recognition that tackles these two issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-29T15:49:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.