Characterizing AlphaEarth Embedding Geometry for Agentic Environmental Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18715v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 18:14:33 GMT
• Title: Characterizing AlphaEarth Embedding Geometry for Agentic Environmental Reasoning
• Abstract summary: We characterize the manifold geometry of Google AlphaEarth's embeddings across 12.1 million samples.<n>We develop an agentic system that decomposes environmental queries into reasoning chains over a FAISS-indexed embedding database.
• Score: 0.21847754147782883
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Earth observation foundation models encode land surface information into dense embedding vectors, yet the geometric structure of these representations and its implications for downstream reasoning remain underexplored. We characterize the manifold geometry of Google AlphaEarth's 64-dimensional embeddings across 12.1 million Continental United States samples (2017--2023) and develop an agentic system that leverages this geometric understanding for environmental reasoning. The manifold is non-Euclidean: effective dimensionality is 13.3 (participation ratio) from 64 raw dimensions, with local intrinsic dimensionality of approximately 10. Tangent spaces rotate substantially, with 84\% of locations exceeding 60\textdegree{} and local-global alignment (mean$|\cosθ| = 0.17$) approaching the random baseline of 0.125. Supervised linear probes indicate that concept directions rotate across the manifold, and compositional vector arithmetic using both PCA-derived and probe-derived directions yields poor precision. Retrieval instead produces physically coherent results, with local geometry predicting retrieval coherence ($R^2 = 0.32$). Building on this characterization, we introduce an agentic system with nine specialized tools that decomposes environmental queries into reasoning chains over a FAISS-indexed embedding database. A five-condition ablation (120 queries, three complexity tiers) shows that embedding retrieval dominates response quality ($μ= 3.79 \pm 0.90$ vs.\ $3.03 \pm 0.77$ parametric-only; scale 1--5), with peak performance on multi-step comparisons ($μ= 4.28 \pm 0.43$). A cross-model benchmark show that geometric tools reduce Sonnet 4.5's score by 0.12 points but improve Opus 4.6's by 0.07, with Opus achieving higher geometric grounding (3.38 vs.\ 2.64), suggesting that the value of geometric characterization scales with the reasoning capability of the consuming model.

Related papers

• Curvature-Aware Radius Shrinkage for Adaptive Nearest Neighbor Classification [52.452902154360565]
  CARSANN is a geometry-driven framework that adapts the spatial support of each neighborhood according to local geometric complexity.<n>Experiments on more than 70 real-world OpenML datasets show that CARSANN consistently improves upon standard $k$-NN.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-27T19:19:07Z)
• Trajectory Geometry of Transformer Representations Across Layers [0.5599792629509229]
  We recast the transformer forward pass as a discrete population trajectory through a high-dimensional representation manifold.<n>We characterize trajectory geometry using five metrics computed directly in the ambient space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-08T09:54:07Z)
• Intrinsic Wasserstein Rates for Score-Based Generative Models on Smooth Manifolds [61.14405512940818]
  We show that Score-based generative models are trained in high-dimensional ambient spaces.<n>We use a ReLU implementation of nearest-projection coordinates via finite intrinsic anchors and Gauss Newton.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-15T10:20:05Z)
• ATLAS: Constitution-Conditioned Latent Geometry and Redistribution Across Language Models and Neural Perturbation Data [0.0]
  Constitution-conditioned post-training can be analysed as a structured perturbation of a model's learned representational geometry.<n>We introduce ATLAS, a geometry-first program that traces constitution-induced hidden-state structure across charts, models, and substrates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-19T23:26:02Z)
• Do Foundation Models Know Geometry? Probing Frozen Features for Continuous Physical Measurement [0.0]
  Vision-language models encode geometry that their text pathway fails to express.<n>LoRA fine-tuning (r=16, 2,000 images) narrows this gap to 6.5 degrees.<n>These findings enable a single frozen backbone to function as a multi-task geometric sensor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-06T16:48:27Z)
• Physically Interpretable AlphaEarth Foundation Model Embeddings Enable LLM-Based Land Surface Intelligence [0.0]
  We present a comprehensive interpretability analysis of Google AlphaEarth's 64-dimensional embeddings against 26 environmental variables.<n>We then developed a Land Surface Intelligence system that implements retrieval-augmented generation over a FAISS-indexed embedding database of 12.1 million vectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T22:58:50Z)
• Riemannian Zeroth-Order Gradient Estimation with Structure-Preserving Metrics for Geodesically Incomplete Manifolds [57.179679246370114]
  We construct metrics that are geodesically complete while ensuring that every stationary point under the new metric remains stationary under the original one.<n>An $$-stationary point under the constructed metric $g'$ also corresponds to an $$-stationary point under the original metric $g'$.<n>Experiments on a practical mesh optimization task demonstrate that our framework maintains stable convergence even in the absence of geodesic completeness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T22:08:03Z)
• Follow the Energy, Find the Path: Riemannian Metrics from Energy-Based Models [63.331590876872944]
  We propose a method for deriving Riemannian metrics directly from pretrained Energy-Based Models.<n>These metrics define spatially varying distances, enabling the computation of geodesics.<n>We show that EBM-derived metrics consistently outperform established baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T12:18:08Z)
• On-the-fly Point Feature Representation for Point Clouds Analysis [7.074010861305738]
  We propose On-the-fly Point Feature Representation (OPFR), which captures abundant geometric information explicitly through Curve Feature Generator module. We also introduce the Local Reference Constructor module, which approximates the local coordinate systems based on triangle sets. OPFR only requires extra 1.56ms for inference (65x faster than vanilla PFH) and 0.012M more parameters, and it can serve as a versatile plug-and-play module for various backbones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-31T04:57:06Z)
• Adaptive Surface Normal Constraint for Geometric Estimation from Monocular Images [56.86175251327466]
  We introduce a novel approach to learn geometries such as depth and surface normal from images while incorporating geometric context. Our approach extracts geometric context that encodes the geometric variations present in the input image and correlates depth estimation with geometric constraints. Our method unifies depth and surface normal estimations within a cohesive framework, which enables the generation of high-quality 3D geometry from images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T17:57:59Z)
• Neural Convolutional Surfaces [59.172308741945336]
  This work is concerned with a representation of shapes that disentangles fine, local and possibly repeating geometry, from global, coarse structures. We show that this approach achieves better neural shape compression than the state of the art, as well as enabling manipulation and transfer of shape details.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-05T15:40:11Z)
• PUGeo-Net: A Geometry-centric Network for 3D Point Cloud Upsampling [103.09504572409449]
  We propose a novel deep neural network based method, called PUGeo-Net, to generate uniform dense point clouds. Thanks to its geometry-centric nature, PUGeo-Net works well for both CAD models with sharp features and scanned models with rich geometric details.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-24T14:13:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.