Towards More Empathic Programming Environments: An Experimental Empathic AI-Enhanced IDE

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19142v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:45:30 GMT
• Title: Towards More Empathic Programming Environments: An Experimental Empathic AI-Enhanced IDE
• Abstract summary: This study introduces "Ceci," our Caring Empathic C IDE designed to support novice programmers by prioritizing learning and emotional support over code generation.<n>Although the sample size was small, results show that there is no significant difference in perceived effectiveness, learning and workload between the Experimental Ceci group and the Control group.<n>These findings suggest that empathic responses may not be sufficient on their own to enhance the learner's outcomes, perceptions, or reduce workload.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: As generative AI becomes integral to software development, the risk of over-reliance and diminished critical thinking grows. This study introduces "Ceci," our Caring Empathic C IDE designed to support novice programmers by prioritizing learning and emotional support over direct code generation. The researchers conducted a comparative pilot study between Ceci and VSCode + ChatGPT [9, 40]. Participants completed a coding task and were evaluated using the NASA-TLX workload assessment and a post-test usability survey. Although the sample size was small (n = 11), results show that there is no significant difference in perceived effectiveness, learning and workload between the Experimental Ceci group and the Control group, though Ceci users reported significantly greater perceived helpfulness in error correction (p = 0.0220). These findings suggest that empathic responses may not be sufficient on their own to enhance the learner's outcomes, perceptions, or reduce workload. Overall, this study provides a foundational framework for future research. Such research should explore larger sample sizes, diverse programming tasks, and additional empathic features to better understand the potential of empathic programming environments in supporting novice programmers; they must also ensure that the empathic features are well-integrated in the user interface.

Related papers

• Developers' Experience with Generative AI Beyond Productivity Assessment -- Insights from an Empirical Mixed-Methods Field Study [7.932998356208937]
  This paper investigates how professional developers engage with Generative AI (GenAI) in their natural work environment.<n>Results show developers are generally satisfied with GenAI, particularly for monotonous, repetitive, and structured tasks.<n>During development-heavy tasks, results indicate that perceived cognitive load arises from AI interaction, while perceived productivity depends on AI output quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-02T15:43:21Z)
• AIRS-Bench: a Suite of Tasks for Frontier AI Research Science Agents [49.67355440164857]
  We introduce AIRS-Bench, a suite of 20 tasks sourced from state-of-the-art machine learning papers.<n>Airs-Bench tasks assess agentic capabilities over the full research lifecycle.<n>We open-source the AIRS-Bench task definitions and evaluation code to catalyze further development in autonomous scientific research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-06T16:45:02Z)
• How Students Use Generative AI for Software Testing: An Observational Study [3.2402950370430497]
  This study investigates how novice software developers interact with generative AI for engineering unit tests.<n>We identified four interaction strategies, defined by whether the test idea or the test implementation originated from generative AI or the participant.<n>Students reported benefits including time-saving, reduced cognitive load, and support for test ideation, but also noted drawbacks such as diminished trust, test quality concerns, and lack of ownership.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-12T11:31:41Z)
• CoCoNUTS: Concentrating on Content while Neglecting Uninformative Textual Styles for AI-Generated Peer Review Detection [60.52240468810558]
  We introduce CoCoNUTS, a content-oriented benchmark built upon a fine-grained dataset of AI-generated peer reviews.<n>We also develop CoCoDet, an AI review detector via a multi-task learning framework, to achieve more accurate and robust detection of AI involvement in review content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T06:03:11Z)
• The Impact of LLM-Assistants on Software Developer Productivity: A Systematic Literature Review [4.503986781849658]
  Large language model assistants (LLM-assistants) present new opportunities to transform software development.<n>Despite growing interest, there is no synthesis of how LLM-assistants affect software developer productivity.<n>Our analysis reveals that LLM-assistants offer both considerable benefits and critical risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T20:25:49Z)
• Level Up Peer Review in Education: Investigating genAI-driven Gamification system and its influence on Peer Feedback Effectiveness [0.8087870525861938]
  This paper introduces Socratique, a gamified peer-assessment platform integrated with Generative AI (GenAI) assistance.<n>By incorporating game elements, Socratique aims to motivate students to provide more feedback.<n>Students in the treatment group provided significantly more voluntary feedback, with higher scores on clarity, relevance, and specificity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T18:30:25Z)
• Human-AI Experience in Integrated Development Environments: A Systematic Literature Review [2.1749194587826026]
  The integration of Artificial Intelligence into Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) is reshaping how developers interact with their tools.<n>This shift marks the emergence of Human-AI Experience in Integrated Development Environment (in-IDE HAX)<n>Research on in-IDE HAX remains fragmented, which highlights the need for a unified overview of current practices, challenges, and opportunities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-08T12:40:18Z)
• Interactive Agents to Overcome Ambiguity in Software Engineering [61.40183840499932]
  AI agents are increasingly being deployed to automate tasks, often based on ambiguous and underspecified user instructions.<n>Making unwarranted assumptions and failing to ask clarifying questions can lead to suboptimal outcomes.<n>We study the ability of LLM agents to handle ambiguous instructions in interactive code generation settings by evaluating proprietary and open-weight models on their performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T17:12:26Z)
• Towards Decoding Developer Cognition in the Age of AI Assistants [9.887133861477233]
  We propose a controlled observational study combining physiological measurements (EEG and eye tracking) with interaction data to examine developers' use of AI-assisted programming tools.<n>We will recruit professional developers to complete programming tasks both with and without AI assistance while measuring their cognitive load and task completion time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-05T23:25:21Z)
• Composite Learning for Robust and Effective Dense Predictions [81.2055761433725]
  Multi-task learning promises better model generalization on a target task by jointly optimizing it with an auxiliary task. We find that jointly training a dense prediction (target) task with a self-supervised (auxiliary) task can consistently improve the performance of the target task, while eliminating the need for labeling auxiliary tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T17:59:16Z)
• CCLF: A Contrastive-Curiosity-Driven Learning Framework for Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning [56.20123080771364]
  We develop a model-agnostic Contrastive-Curiosity-Driven Learning Framework (CCLF) for reinforcement learning. CCLF fully exploit sample importance and improve learning efficiency in a self-supervised manner. We evaluate this approach on the DeepMind Control Suite, Atari, and MiniGrid benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-02T14:42:05Z)
• What Makes Good Contrastive Learning on Small-Scale Wearable-based Tasks? [59.51457877578138]
  We study contrastive learning on the wearable-based activity recognition task. This paper presents an open-source PyTorch library textttCL-HAR, which can serve as a practical tool for researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-12T06:10:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.