Headlines You Won't Forget: Can Pronoun Insertion Increase Memorability?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19189v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:58:03 GMT
• Title: Headlines You Won't Forget: Can Pronoun Insertion Increase Memorability?
• Abstract summary: We examine how a specific linguistic feature, namely direct address through first- and second-person pronouns, affects memorability.<n>Across three memorization experiments with a total of 240 participants, we show that pronoun insertion has mixed effects on memorability.
• Score: 2.2672506866861695
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: For news headlines to influence beliefs and drive action, relevant information needs to be retained and retrievable from memory. In this probing study we draw on experiment designs from cognitive psychology to examine how a specific linguistic feature, namely direct address through first- and second-person pronouns, affects memorability and to what extent it is feasible to use large language models for the targeted insertion of such a feature into existing text without changing its core meaning. Across three controlled memorization experiments with a total of 240 participants, yielding 7,680 unique memory judgments, we show that pronoun insertion has mixed effects on memorability. Exploratory analyses indicate that effects differ based on headline topic, how pronouns are inserted and their immediate contexts. Additional data and fine-grained analysis is needed to draw definitive conclusions on these mediating factors. We further show that automatic revisions by LLMs are not always appropriate: Crowdsourced evaluations find many of them to be lacking in content accuracy and emotion retention or resulting in unnatural writing style. We make our collected data available for future work.

Related papers

• Who and What? Using Linguistic Features and Annotator Characteristics to Analyze Annotation Variation [11.220035519005833]
  We present the first large-scale analysis of four reference datasets for harmful language detection.<n>We bring together annotator characteristics, linguistic properties of the items, and their interactions in a statistically informed picture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T14:18:54Z)
• Switchboard-Affect: Emotion Perception Labels from Conversational Speech [7.576840738395629]
  We identify the Switchboard corpus as a promising source of naturalistic conversational speech.<n>We train a crowd to label the dataset for categorical emotions and dimensional attributes.<n>We evaluate state-of-the-art SER models and find variable performance across the emotion categories with especially poor generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T21:23:04Z)
• When Personalization Tricks Detectors: The Feature-Inversion Trap in Machine-Generated Text Detection [64.23509202768945]
  We introduce dataset, the first benchmark for evaluating detector robustness in personalized settings.<n>Our experimental results demonstrate large performance gaps across detectors in personalized settings.<n>We propose method, a simple and reliable way to predict detector performance changes in personalized settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T13:10:23Z)
• Word Importance Explains How Prompts Affect Language Model Outputs [0.7223681457195862]
  This study presents a method to improve the explainability of large language models by varying individual words in prompts. Unlike classical attention, word importance measures the impact of prompt words on arbitrarily-defined text scores. Results show that word importance scores are closely related to the expected suffix importances for multiple scoring functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T15:04:18Z)
• What Evidence Do Language Models Find Convincing? [94.90663008214918]
  We build a dataset that pairs controversial queries with a series of real-world evidence documents that contain different facts. We use this dataset to perform sensitivity and counterfactual analyses to explore which text features most affect LLM predictions. Overall, we find that current models rely heavily on the relevance of a website to the query, while largely ignoring stylistic features that humans find important.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T02:15:34Z)
• Learning from Implicit User Feedback, Emotions and Demographic Information in Task-Oriented and Document-Grounded Dialogues [52.95506649193427]
  We introduce FEDI, the first English task-oriented and document-grounded dialogue dataset annotated with this information. Experiments with Flan-T5, GPT-2 and Llama 2 show a particularly positive impact on task completion and factual consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T14:52:26Z)
• Quantifying the redundancy between prosody and text [67.07817268372743]
  We use large language models to estimate how much information is redundant between prosody and the words themselves. We find a high degree of redundancy between the information carried by the words and prosodic information across several prosodic features. Still, we observe that prosodic features can not be fully predicted from text, suggesting that prosody carries information above and beyond the words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T21:15:24Z)
• When a Language Question Is at Stake. A Revisited Approach to Label Sensitive Content [0.0]
  Article revisits an approach of pseudo-labeling sensitive data on the example of Ukrainian tweets covering the Russian-Ukrainian war. We provide a fundamental statistical analysis of the obtained data, evaluation of models used for pseudo-labelling, and set further guidelines on how the scientists can leverage the corpus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-17T13:35:10Z)
• Acoustic and linguistic representations for speech continuous emotion recognition in call center conversations [2.0653090022137697]
  We explore the use of pre-trained speech representations as a form of transfer learning towards AlloSat corpus. Our experiments confirm the large gain in performance obtained with the use of pre-trained features. Surprisingly, we found that the linguistic content is clearly the major contributor for the prediction of satisfaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T10:22:51Z)
• Syntax and Semantics Meet in the "Middle": Probing the Syntax-Semantics Interface of LMs Through Agentivity [68.8204255655161]
  We present the semantic notion of agentivity as a case study for probing such interactions. This suggests LMs may potentially serve as more useful tools for linguistic annotation, theory testing, and discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T16:24:01Z)
• Representing Affect Information in Word Embeddings [5.378735006566249]
  We investigated whether and how the affect meaning of a word is encoded in word embeddings pre-trained in large neural networks. The embeddings varied in being static or contextualized, and how much affect specific information was prioritized during the pre-training and fine-tuning phase.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-21T18:16:33Z)
• Fake it Till You Make it: Self-Supervised Semantic Shifts for Monolingual Word Embedding Tasks [58.87961226278285]
  We propose a self-supervised approach to model lexical semantic change. We show that our method can be used for the detection of semantic change with any alignment method. We illustrate the utility of our techniques using experimental results on three different datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-30T18:59:43Z)
• Abstractive Summarization of Spoken and Written Instructions with BERT [66.14755043607776]
  We present the first application of the BERTSum model to conversational language. We generate abstractive summaries of narrated instructional videos across a wide variety of topics. We envision this integrated as a feature in intelligent virtual assistants, enabling them to summarize both written and spoken instructional content upon request.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-21T20:59:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.