Beyond Semantic Similarity: A Component-Wise Evaluation Framework for Medical Question Answering Systems with Health Equity Implications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19281v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 09:50:08 GMT
• Title: Beyond Semantic Similarity: A Component-Wise Evaluation Framework for Medical Question Answering Systems with Health Equity Implications
• Abstract summary: We present a new evaluation framework for medical question answering called VB-Score.<n>We perform rigorous reviews of the performance of three well-known and widely used Large Language Models.<n>Our findings indicate alarming performance disparities across various public health topics.
• Score: 0.957154155094766
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to support patients in addressing medical questions is becoming increasingly prevalent. However, most of the measures currently used to evaluate the performance of these models in this context only measure how closely a model's answers match semantically, and therefore do not provide a true indication of the model's medical accuracy or of the health equity risks associated with it. To address these shortcomings, we present a new evaluation framework for medical question answering called VB-Score (Verification-Based Score) that provides a separate evaluation of the four components of entity recognition, semantic similarity, factual consistency, and structured information completeness for medical question-answering models. We perform rigorous reviews of the performance of three well-known and widely used LLMs on 48 public health-related topics taken from high-quality, authoritative information sources. Based on our analyses, we discover a major discrepancy between the models' semantic and entity accuracy. Our assessments of the performance of all three models show that each of them has almost uniformly severe performance failures when evaluated against our criteria. Our findings indicate alarming performance disparities across various public health topics, with most of the models exhibiting 13.8% lower performance (compared to an overall average) for all the public health topics that relate to chronic conditions that occur in older and minority populations, which indicates the existence of what's known as condition-based algorithmic discrimination. Our findings also demonstrate that prompt engineering alone does not compensate for basic architectural limitations on how these models perform in extracting medical entities and raise the question of whether semantic evaluation alone is a sufficient measure of medical AI safety.

Related papers

• QuarkMedBench: A Real-World Scenario Driven Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models [8.050059911826338]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) excel on standardized medical exams, but high scores often fail to translate to high-quality responses for real-world medical queries.<n>We introduce QuarkMedBench, an ecologically valid benchmark tailored for real-world medical LLM assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-14T01:51:43Z)
• When Metrics Disagree: Automatic Similarity vs. LLM-as-a-Judge for Clinical Dialogue Evaluation [18.338933046286257]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly employed to address diverse problems, including medical queries.<n>LLMs often perform poorly in medical contexts, potentially leading to harmful misguidance for users.<n>This paper focuses on fine-tuning the Llama 2 7B, a transformer-based, decoder-only model, using transcripts from real patient-doctor interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T21:09:43Z)
• Towards Reliable Medical LLMs: Benchmarking and Enhancing Confidence Estimation of Large Language Models in Medical Consultation [97.36081721024728]
  We propose the first benchmark for assessing confidence in multi-turn interaction during realistic medical consultations.<n>Our benchmark unifies three types of medical data for open-ended diagnostic generation.<n>We present MedConf, an evidence-grounded linguistic self-assessment framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T04:51:39Z)
• TemMed-Bench: Evaluating Temporal Medical Image Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [54.48710348910535]
  Existing medical reasoning benchmarks primarily focus on analyzing a patient's condition based on an image from a single visit.<n>We introduce TemMed-Bench, the first benchmark designed for analyzing changes in patients' conditions between different clinical visits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T17:51:26Z)
• Med-RewardBench: Benchmarking Reward Models and Judges for Medical Multimodal Large Language Models [57.73472878679636]
  We introduce Med-RewardBench, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate medical reward models and judges.<n>Med-RewardBench features a multimodal dataset spanning 13 organ systems and 8 clinical departments, with 1,026 expert-annotated cases.<n>A rigorous three-step process ensures high-quality evaluation data across six clinically critical dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-29T08:58:39Z)
• Towards Domain Specification of Embedding Models in Medicine [1.0713888959520208]
  We propose a comprehensive benchmark suite of 51 tasks spanning classification, clustering, pair classification, and retrieval modeled on the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (MTEB)<n>Our results demonstrate that this combined approach establishes a robust evaluation framework and yields embeddings that consistently outperform state of the art alternatives in different tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T16:15:00Z)
• How Far Have Medical Vision-Language Models Come? A Comprehensive Benchmarking Study [16.84832179579428]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) trained on web-scale corpora excel at natural image tasks and are increasingly repurposed for healthcare.<n>We present a comprehensive evaluation of open-source general-purpose and medically specialised VLMs, across eight benchmarks.<n>First, large general-purpose models already match or surpass medical-specific counterparts on several benchmarks, demonstrating strong zero-shot transfer from natural to medical images.<n>Second, reasoning performance is consistently lower than understanding, highlighting a critical barrier to safe decision support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-15T11:12:39Z)
• Uncertainty-Driven Expert Control: Enhancing the Reliability of Medical Vision-Language Models [52.2001050216955]
  Existing methods aim to enhance the performance of Medical Vision Language Model (MedVLM) by adjusting model structure, fine-tuning with high-quality data, or through preference fine-tuning.<n>We propose an expert-in-the-loop framework named Expert-Controlled-Free Guidance (Expert-CFG) to align MedVLM with clinical expertise without additional training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-12T09:03:30Z)
• AutoMedEval: Harnessing Language Models for Automatic Medical Capability Evaluation [55.2739790399209]
  We present AutoMedEval, an open-sourced automatic evaluation model with 13B parameters specifically engineered to measure the question-answering proficiency of medical LLMs.<n>The overarching objective of AutoMedEval is to assess the quality of responses produced by diverse models, aspiring to significantly reduce the dependence on human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T07:44:54Z)
• MedAgentsBench: Benchmarking Thinking Models and Agent Frameworks for Complex Medical Reasoning [34.93995619867384]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on existing medical question-answering benchmarks.<n>We present MedAgentsBench, a benchmark that focuses on challenging medical questions requiring multi-step clinical reasoning, diagnosis formulation, and treatment planning-scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T15:38:44Z)
• Uncertainty Estimation of Large Language Models in Medical Question Answering [60.72223137560633]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise for natural language generation in healthcare, but risk hallucinating factually incorrect information. We benchmark popular uncertainty estimation (UE) methods with different model sizes on medical question-answering datasets. Our results show that current approaches generally perform poorly in this domain, highlighting the challenge of UE for medical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T16:51:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.