DebugRepair: Enhancing LLM-Based Automated Program Repair via Self-Directed Debugging

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19305v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:11:59 GMT
• Title: DebugRepair: Enhancing LLM-Based Automated Program Repair via Self-Directed Debugging
• Abstract summary: DebugRepair is a self-directed framework for automated program repair.<n>It improves patch refinement with intermediate runtime evidence.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art performance against 15 approaches.
• Score: 20.747648291211338
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Automated Program Repair (APR) has benefited from the code understanding and generation capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). Existing feedback-based APR methods iteratively refine candidate patches using test execution feedback and have shown promising results. However, most rely on outcome-level failure symptoms, such as stack traces, which show how failures are observed but fail to expose the intermediate runtime states critical for root-cause analysis. As a result, LLMs often infer bug causes without sufficient runtime evidence, leading to incorrect patches. To address this limitation, we propose DebugRepair, a self-directed debugging framework for LLM-based APR. DebugRepair enhances patch refinement with intermediate runtime evidence collected through simulated debugging. It consists of three components: test semantic purification, simulated instrumentation, and debugging-driven conversational repair. Together, they reduce noisy test context, collect runtime traces through targeted debugging statements with rule-based fallback, and progressively refine candidate patches using prior attempts and newly observed runtime states. We evaluate DebugRepair on three benchmarks across Java and Python. Experiments show that DebugRepair achieves state-of-the-art performance against 15 approaches. With GPT-3.5, it correctly fixes 224 bugs on Defects4J, outperforming prior SOTA LLM-based methods by 26.2%. With DeepSeek-V3, it correctly fixes 295 Defects4J bugs, surpassing the second-best baseline by 59 bugs. Across five additional backbone LLMs, DebugRepair improves repair performance by 51.3% over vanilla settings. Ablation studies further confirm the effectiveness of all components.

Related papers

• CausalRepair: Bridging the Causality Gap in Large Language Model-Based Automated Program Repair via Dual-Slicing [18.917995731082073]
  CausalRepair is a conversation-driven APR framework based on minimal causal context.<n>It correctly fixes 313 bugs on Defects4J, outperforming state-of-the-art approaches such as ReinFix and TSAPR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T07:56:32Z)
• Beyond Fail-to-Pass: Iterative Hardening of Co-Generated Bug Reproduction Tests and Fixes [55.114939648705395]
  Large language models (LLMs) have made automated program repair increasingly practical for real-world bugs.<n>Bug reproduction tests (BRTs) help close this gap by turning a bug report into an executable, bug-specific signal.<n>We propose CoHarden, a co-generation framework that uses the Lax signal as an in-loop convergence criterion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-22T07:30:07Z)
• AgentDebugX: An Open-Source Toolkit for Failure Observability, Attribution, and Recovery in LLM Agents [83.37969790806069]
  LLM agent failures are difficult to debug because the step where an error surfaces is often not the one that caused it.<n>We present Agent DebuggerX, an open-source framework that organizes debug as a closed loop of Detect, Attribute, Recover, and Rerun.<n>At its core, Deep Debugger performs multi-turn root-cause diagnosis through global trajectory understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-21T06:21:13Z)
• Specification Vibing for Automated Program Repair [8.68148153927532]
  VibeRepair is a specification-centric APR technique that treats repair as behavior-specification repair rather than ad-hoc code editing.<n>On Defects4J v1.2, VibeRepair correctly repairs 174 bugs, exceeding the strongest state-of-the-art baseline by 28 bugs.<n>On Defects4J v2.0, it repairs 178 bugs, outperforming prior approaches by 33 bugs, representing a 23% improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T04:44:58Z)
• DynaFix: Iterative Automated Program Repair Driven by Execution-Level Dynamic Information [20.300297868395454]
  Automated Program Repair (APR) aims to automatically generate correct patches for buggy programs.<n>Recent approaches leveraging large language models (LLMs) have shown promise but face limitations.<n>We propose DynaFix, an execution-level dynamic information-driven APR method that iteratively leverages runtime information to refine the repair process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-31T05:13:34Z)
• InspectCoder: Dynamic Analysis-Enabled Self Repair through interactive LLM-Debugger Collaboration [71.18377595277018]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently generate buggy code with complex logic errors that are challenging to diagnose.<n>We present InspectCoder, the first agentic program repair system that empowers LLMs to actively conduct dynamic analysis via interactive debugger control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T06:26:29Z)
• Do AI models help produce verified bug fixes? [62.985237003585674]
  Large Language Models are used to produce corrections to software bugs.<n>This paper investigates how programmers use Large Language Models to complement their own skills.<n>The results are a first step towards a proper role for AI and LLMs in providing guaranteed-correct fixes to program bugs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T17:30:16Z)
• Repair Ingredients Are All You Need: Improving Large Language Model-Based Program Repair via Repair Ingredients Search [41.50068103527948]
  We propose ReinFix, a framework that searches for repair ingredients throughout the reasoning and solution phases of bug fixing.<n>During the solution phase, ReinFix searches for external ingredients from historical bug fixes with similar bug patterns.<n> Evaluations on two popular benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach over SOTA baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T06:02:11Z)
• Learning to Generate Unit Tests for Automated Debugging [52.63217175637201]
  Unit tests (UTs) play an instrumental role in assessing code correctness as well as providing feedback to large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose UTGen, which teaches LLMs to generate unit test inputs that reveal errors along with their correct expected outputs.<n>We show that UTGen outperforms other LLM-based baselines by 7.59% based on a metric measuring the presence of both error-revealing UT inputs and correct UT outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T18:51:43Z)
• ContrastRepair: Enhancing Conversation-Based Automated Program Repair via Contrastive Test Case Pairs [23.419180504723546]
  ContrastRepair is a novel APR approach that augments conversation-driven APR by providing contrastive test pairs. We evaluate ContrastRepair on multiple benchmark datasets, including Defects4j, QuixBugs, and HumanEval-Java.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T12:15:28Z)
• DebugBench: Evaluating Debugging Capability of Large Language Models [80.73121177868357]
  DebugBench is a benchmark for Large Language Models (LLMs) It covers four major bug categories and 18 minor types in C++, Java, and Python. We evaluate two commercial and four open-source models in a zero-shot scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-09T15:46:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.