OpenCLAW-P2P v6.0: Resilient Multi-Layer Persistence, Live Reference Verification, and Production-Scale Evaluation of Decentralized AI Peer Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19792v1
• Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2026 09:08:24 GMT
• Title: OpenCLAW-P2P v6.0: Resilient Multi-Layer Persistence, Live Reference Verification, and Production-Scale Evaluation of Decentralized AI Peer Review
• Abstract summary: OpenCLAW-P2P v6.0 is an evolution of the decentralized collective-intelligence platform.<n>It publishes, peer-review, score, and iteratively improve scientific research papers without any human gatekeeper.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper presents OpenCLAW-P2P v6.0, a comprehensive evolution of the decentralized collective-intelligence platform in which autonomous AI agents publish, peer-review, score, and iteratively improve scientific research papers without any human gatekeeper. Building on v5.0 foundations -- tribunal-gated publishing, multi-LLM granular scoring, calibrated deception detection, the Silicon Chess-Grid FSM, and the AETHER containerized inference engine -- this release introduces four major new subsystems: (1) a multi-layer paper persistence architecture with four storage tiers (in-memory cache, Cloudflare R2, Gun.js, GitHub) ensuring zero paper loss across redeployments; (2) a multi-layer retrieval cascade with automatic backfill reducing lookup latency from >3s to <50ms; (3) live reference verification querying CrossRef, arXiv, and Semantic Scholar during scoring to detect fabricated citations with >85% accuracy; and (4) a scientific API proxy providing rate-limited cached access to seven public databases. The platform operates with 14 real autonomous agents producing 50+ scored papers (word counts 2,072-4,073, leaderboard scores 6.4-8.1) alongside 23 labeled simulated citizens. We present honest production statistics, failure-mode analysis, a paper recovery protocol that salvaged 25 lost papers, and lessons learned from operating the system at scale. All pre-existing subsystems -- 17-judge multi-LLM scoring, 14-rule calibration with 8 deception detectors, tribunal cognitive examination, Proof of Value consensus, Laws-of-Form eigenform verification, and tau-normalized agent coordination -- are retained and further hardened. All code is open-source at https://github.com/Agnuxo1/p2pclaw-mcp-server.

Related papers

• Codebook Agent: Amortized Topology Design for LLM Multi-Agent Systems [67.04448659688579]
  We develop a query-independent 16-entry codebook that ranks the top decoded candidates in a single batched forward pass.<n>With no iterative search and no message passing at test time, Codebook Agent is the most accurate method on all six benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-02T08:10:22Z)
• From Traceability to Justifiability: Accountability Structures in Agentic Software Engineering [0.0]
  We measure, from public material only, whether AI records can express a claim and whether they hold where declared.<n>Across 188 double-graded cells we found no platform whose default record emits a content identity of a behavioral system.<n>An instrument computes realized assurance depth from a pipeline's published exhaust alone and compares it with the declared depth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-21T16:45:00Z)
• Deep Academic Survey: Stateful Agentic Closed-Loop Paradigm for Academic Survey Automation [60.151050016855834]
  DAS is a stateful agentic framework for generating publication-oriented academic surveys.<n>Its key idea is to separate reusable paper analysis from topic-specific manuscript construction.<n>DAS achieves the highest average in all four dimensions, with an overall score of 4.34 compared with 4.03 for the strongest competitor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-18T17:29:00Z)
• Fantastic Adaptive Taxonomies and How to Use Them [100.20614173157708]
  AdaMAST converts execution traces into a compact, evidence-grounded failure taxonomy.<n>No code is hand-authored, no trace human-annotated.<n>In agent-system search, taxonomy-coded diagnoses of failed candidates outperform free-form.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-17T17:41:16Z)
• The Balkanization of Execution-Security Research for AI Coding Agents: Isolation, Access Control, and Time-of-Check-to-Time-of-Use Vulnerabilities [0.0]
  Papers on sandbox isolation, capability and access control, policy enforcement, time-of-check-to-time-of-use (TOCTOU) races, Model Context Protocol (MCP) threats, identity delegation, execution provenance, network egress control, and static analysis of agent-generated code are published independently and rarely cite one another.<n>We systematize 39 papers published between 2023 and 2026 into 17 categories, each verified directly against its source.<n>Reading across categories surfaces five cross-cutting gaps that no single paper addresses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-07T01:56:18Z)
• Prompt-to-Paper: Agentic AI System for Bioinformatics [0.0]
  We present Prompt-to-Paper, a multi-agent framework that directly addresses this evaluation gap through three integrated innovations.<n>First, a deterministic retrieval-augmented generation pipeline with section-aware relevance scoring and snowball citation expansion grounds every claim in a verifiable corpus of 60--100 papers.<n>Second, an autonomous coding agent executes real computational biology experiments replacing synthetic outputs with genuine numerical results.<n>Third, an eight-dimensional automated quality scorer, benchmarked with approximate reference statistics from published papers and augmented with explicit hallucination penalties, provides standardized, reproducible quality assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-05T21:30:24Z)
• Paper Circle: An Open-source Multi-agent Research Discovery and Analysis Framework [82.66443886385125]
  Paper Circle is a discovery and analysis system designed to reduce the effort required to find, assess, organize, and understand academic literature.<n>The system comprises two complementary pipelines: (1) a Discovery Pipeline that integrates offline and online retrieval from multiple sources, multi-agent scoring, diversity-aware ranking, and structured outputs; and (2) an Analysis Pipeline that transforms individual papers into structured knowledge graphs with typed nodes such as concepts, methods, and figures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-07T17:59:58Z)
• ClawArena: Benchmarking AI Agents in Evolving Information Environments [61.664633997138004]
  ClawArena is a benchmark for evaluating AI agents in evolving information environments.<n>Each scenario maintains a complete hidden ground truth while exposing the agent only to noisy, partial, and sometimes contradictory traces.<n> evaluation is organized around three coupled challenges: multi-source conflict reasoning, dynamic belief revision, and implicit personalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-05T17:55:23Z)
• Graph-Native Cognitive Memory for AI Agents: Formal Belief Revision Semantics for Versioned Memory Architectures [0.6091702876917279]
  Kumiho is a graph-native cognitive memory architecture grounded in formal belief revision semantics.<n>The architecture implements a dual-store model (Redis working memory, Neo4j long-term graph) with hybrid fulltext and vector retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-18T00:59:49Z)
• What Papers Don't Tell You: Recovering Tacit Knowledge for Automated Paper Reproduction [57.86097956633207]
  method is a graph-based agent framework for generating executable code from academic papers.<n>On an extended ReproduceBench spanning 3 domains, 10 tasks, and 40 recent papers, method achieves an average performance gap of 10.04% against official implementations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T12:33:31Z)
• NERFIFY: A Multi-Agent Framework for Turning NeRF Papers into Code [49.610331036334316]
  We introduce NERFIFY, a framework that reliably converts NeRF research papers into trainable Nerfstudio plugins.<n>Code, data and implementations will be publicly released.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-28T20:57:32Z)
• Inference-Time Scaling of Verification: Self-Evolving Deep Research Agents via Test-Time Rubric-Guided Verification [71.98473277917962]
  Recent advances in Deep Research Agents (DRAs) are transforming automated knowledge discovery and problem-solving.<n>We propose an alternative paradigm: self-evolving the agent's ability by iteratively verifying the policy model's outputs, guided by meticulously crafted rubrics.<n>We present DeepVerifier, a rubrics-based outcome reward verifier that leverages the asymmetry of verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T09:47:31Z)
• DeepBridge: A Unified and Production-Ready Framework for Multi-Dimensional Machine Learning Validation [0.0]
  DeepBridge is an 80Kline Python library that unifies validation, automatic compliance verification knowledge distillation, and synthetic data generation.<n>We demonstrate that DeepBridge: reduces validation time by 89% (17 min vs. 150 min with fragmented tools), automatically detects fairness violations with complete coverage/10 features vs. 2/10 from existing tools, generates audit-ready reports in minutes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T01:32:32Z)
• Eigen-1: Adaptive Multi-Agent Refinement with Monitor-Based RAG for Scientific Reasoning [53.45095336430027]
  We develop a unified framework that combines implicit retrieval and structured collaboration.<n>On Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) Bio/Chem Gold, our framework achieves 48.3% accuracy.<n>Results on SuperGPQA and TRQA confirm robustness across domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T14:05:55Z)
• PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Research [3.4567792239799133]
  PaperBench is a benchmark evaluating the ability of AI agents to replicate state-of-the-art AI research.<n>Agents must replicate 20 ICML 2024 Spotlight and Oral papers from scratch.<n>PaperBench contains 8,316 individually gradable tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T15:55:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.