The Existential Theory of Research: Why Discovery Is Hard

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19810v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 10:49:28 GMT
• Title: The Existential Theory of Research: Why Discovery Is Hard
• Abstract summary: We show that no method can guarantee universally simple explanations, arbitrarily compressed observations, and efficient exact inference.<n> representation mismatch alone can inflate intrinsic simplicity into apparent complexity.<n>The results suggest that scientific difficulty is not accidental, but a structural consequence of the geometry and complexity of inference.
• Score: 11.62669179647184
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Can scientific discovery be made arbitrarily easy by choosing the right representation, collecting enough data, and deploying sufficiently powerful algorithms? This paper argues that the answer is fundamentally negative. We introduce the Existential Theory of Research (ETR), a formal framework that models discovery as the recovery of structured explanations under constraints of representation, observation, and computation. Within this framework, we show that these three components cannot be simultaneously optimized: no method can guarantee universally simple explanations, arbitrarily compressed observations, and efficient exact inference. This limitation is not model-specific, but arises from a synthesis of uncertainty principles in sparse representation, sample complexity bounds in high-dimensional recovery, and the computational hardness of exact inference. We further show that representation mismatch alone can inflate intrinsic simplicity into apparent complexity, rendering otherwise tractable problems observationally and computationally prohibitive. To quantify these effects, we introduce an uncertainty functional that captures the joint difficulty of discovery. The results suggest that scientific difficulty is not accidental, but a structural consequence of the geometry and complexity of inference.

Related papers

• NewtonBench: Benchmarking Generalizable Scientific Law Discovery in LLM Agents [65.85967483058705]
  Large language models are emerging as powerful tools for scientific law discovery.<n>Existing benchmarks for this task suffer from a fundamental methodological trilemma.<n>We introduce NewtonBench, a benchmark comprising 324 scientific law discovery tasks across 12 physics domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T16:12:11Z)
• Algorithmic causal structure emerging through compression [53.52699766206808]
  We explore the relationship between causality, symmetry, and compression.<n>We build on and generalize the known connection between learning and compression to a setting where causal models are not identifiable.<n>We define algorithmic causality as an alternative definition of causality when traditional assumptions for causal identifiability do not hold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T16:50:57Z)
• The complexity of entanglement embezzlement [0.0]
  We study the circuit complexity of embezzlement using sequences of states that enable arbitrary precision for the process.<n>We imply that circuit complexity acts as a physical obstruction to perfect embezzlement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T18:00:33Z)
• Extending Complex Logical Queries on Uncertain Knowledge Graphs [50.360531130930646]
  The study of machine learning-based logical query answering enables reasoning with large-scale and incomplete knowledge graphs.<n>We propose a neural symbolic approach that incorporates both forward inference and backward calibration to answer soft queries on large-scale, incomplete, and uncertain knowledge graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-03T13:13:53Z)
• A simplicity bubble problem and zemblanity in digitally intermediated societies [1.4380443010065829]
  We discuss the ubiquity of Big Data and machine learning in society. We show that there is a ceiling above which formal knowledge cannot further decrease the probability of zemblanitous findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T00:02:15Z)
• MetaLogic: Logical Reasoning Explanations with Fine-Grained Structure [129.8481568648651]
  We propose a benchmark to investigate models' logical reasoning capabilities in complex real-life scenarios. Based on the multi-hop chain of reasoning, the explanation form includes three main components. We evaluate the current best models' performance on this new explanation form.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-22T16:01:13Z)
• Bounds on quantum evolution complexity via lattice cryptography [0.0]
  We address the difference between integrable and chaotic motion in quantum theory as manifested by the complexity of the corresponding evolution operators. Complexity is understood here as the shortest geodesic distance between the time-dependent evolution operator and the origin within the group of unitaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-28T16:20:10Z)
• Causal Expectation-Maximisation [70.45873402967297]
  We show that causal inference is NP-hard even in models characterised by polytree-shaped graphs. We introduce the causal EM algorithm to reconstruct the uncertainty about the latent variables from data about categorical manifest variables. We argue that there appears to be an unnoticed limitation to the trending idea that counterfactual bounds can often be computed without knowledge of the structural equations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T10:25:13Z)
• Why Adversarial Interaction Creates Non-Homogeneous Patterns: A Pseudo-Reaction-Diffusion Model for Turing Instability [10.933825676518195]
  We observe Turing-like patterns in a system of neurons with adversarial interaction. We present a pseudo-reaction-diffusion model to explain the mechanism that may underlie these phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-01T16:09:22Z)
• Random thoughts about Complexity, Data and Models [0.0]
  Data Science and Machine learning have been growing strong for the past decade. We investigate the subtle relation between "data and models" Key issue for appraisal of relation between algorithmic complexity and algorithmic learning is to do with concepts of compressibility, determinism and predictability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-16T14:27:22Z)
• A Critical View of the Structural Causal Model [89.43277111586258]
  We show that one can identify the cause and the effect without considering their interaction at all. We propose a new adversarial training method that mimics the disentangled structure of the causal model. Our multidimensional method outperforms the literature methods on both synthetic and real world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-23T22:52:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.