Calibrating conditional risk

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20409v1
• Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 10:24:16 GMT
• Title: Calibrating conditional risk
• Abstract summary: We study the problem of calibrating conditional risk, which involves estimating the expected loss of a prediction model conditional on input features.<n>For classification settings, we establish a connection between conditional risk calibration and individual/conditional probability calibration, and develop theoretical insights for the performance metric.
• Score: 12.616136346335237
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We introduce and study the problem of calibrating conditional risk, which involves estimating the expected loss of a prediction model conditional on input features. We analyze this problem in both classification and regression settings and show that it is fundamentally equivalent to a standard regression task. For classification settings, we further establish a connection between conditional risk calibration and individual/conditional probability calibration, and develop theoretical insights for the performance metric. This reveals that while conditional risk calibration is related to existing uncertainty quantification problems, it remains a distinct and standalone machine learning problem. Empirically, we validate our theoretical findings and demonstrate the practical implications of conditional risk calibration in the learning to defer (L2D) framework. Our systematic experiments provide both qualitative and quantitative assessments, offering guidance for future research in uncertainty-aware decision-making.

Related papers

• Asymptotic Risk Calibration for Selective Question Answering [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) may generate fluent but incorrect answers.<n>We propose A-CRC-QA, a post-hoc calibration framework for uncertainty-aware selective question answering.<n>A-CRC-QA is model-agnostic, requires no additional training, and can be combined with different uncertainty estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-12T12:45:45Z)
• Discovery of Hidden Miscalibration Regimes [52.452902154360565]
  Models may be systematically overconfident on some kinds of inputs and underconfident on others.<n>We define the corresponding miscalibration field and propose a diagnostic framework for estimating it.<n>Our approach learns a calibration-aware representation of the input space and estimates signed local miscalibration by kernel smoothing in the learned geometry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T13:07:50Z)
• On the calibration of survival models with competing risks [9.77401900270683]
  We show that existing calibration measures are not suited to the competing-risk setting.<n>We introduce two novel calibration measures that are minimized for oracle estimators.<n>Our recalibration methods yield good probabilities while preserving discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T10:23:33Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Post-Hoc Calibration: Mitigating Confidently Incorrect Predictions Beyond Calibration Metrics [6.9681910774977815]
  This paper presents a post-hoc calibration framework to enhance calibration quality and uncertainty-aware decision-making.<n>A comprehensive evaluation is conducted using calibration metrics, uncertainty-aware performance measures, and empirical conformal coverage.<n> Experiments show that the proposed method achieves lower confidently incorrect predictions, and competitive Expected Error compared with isotonic and focal-loss baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-19T23:55:36Z)
• Calibrated Prediction Set in Fault Detection with Risk Guarantees via Significance Tests [3.500936878570599]
  This paper proposes a novel fault detection method that integrates significance testing with the conformal prediction framework to provide formal risk guarantees.<n>The proposed method consistently achieves an empirical coverage rate at or above the nominal level ($1-alpha$)<n>The results reveal a controllable trade-off between the user-defined risk level ($alpha$) and efficiency, where higher risk tolerance leads to smaller average prediction set sizes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T05:49:02Z)
• CLUE: Neural Networks Calibration via Learning Uncertainty-Error alignment [7.702016079410588]
  We introduce CLUE (Calibration via Learning Uncertainty-Error Alignment), a novel approach that aligns predicted uncertainty with observed error during training.<n>We show that CLUE achieves superior calibration quality and competitive predictive performance with respect to state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T19:23:47Z)
• Orthogonal Causal Calibration [55.28164682911196]
  We develop general algorithms for reducing the task of causal calibration to that of calibrating a standard (non-causal) predictive model.<n>Our results are exceedingly general, showing that essentially any existing calibration algorithm can be used in causal settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T03:35:25Z)
• Likelihood Ratio Confidence Sets for Sequential Decision Making [51.66638486226482]
  We revisit the likelihood-based inference principle and propose to use likelihood ratios to construct valid confidence sequences. Our method is especially suitable for problems with well-specified likelihoods. We show how to provably choose the best sequence of estimators and shed light on connections to online convex optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T00:10:21Z)
• Calibration by Distribution Matching: Trainable Kernel Calibration Metrics [56.629245030893685]
  We introduce kernel-based calibration metrics that unify and generalize popular forms of calibration for both classification and regression. These metrics admit differentiable sample estimates, making it easy to incorporate a calibration objective into empirical risk minimization. We provide intuitive mechanisms to tailor calibration metrics to a decision task, and enforce accurate loss estimation and no regret decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T06:19:40Z)
• Selective Nonparametric Regression via Testing [54.20569354303575]
  We develop an abstention procedure via testing the hypothesis on the value of the conditional variance at a given point. Unlike existing methods, the proposed one allows to account not only for the value of the variance itself but also for the uncertainty of the corresponding variance predictor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T13:04:11Z)
• Distribution-Free Model-Agnostic Regression Calibration via Nonparametric Methods [9.662269016653296]
  We consider an individual calibration objective for characterizing the quantiles of the prediction model. Existing methods have been largely and lack of statistical guarantee in terms of individual calibration. We propose simple nonparametric calibration methods that are agnostic of the underlying prediction model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-20T21:31:51Z)
• Calibration of Neural Networks [77.34726150561087]
  This paper presents a survey of confidence calibration problems in the context of neural networks. We analyze problem statement, calibration definitions, and different approaches to evaluation. Empirical experiments cover various datasets and models, comparing calibration methods according to different criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-19T20:27:51Z)
• Unsupervised Calibration under Covariate Shift [92.02278658443166]
  We introduce the problem of calibration under domain shift and propose an importance sampling based approach to address it. We evaluate and discuss the efficacy of our method on both real-world datasets and synthetic datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-29T21:50:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.