pAI/MSc: ML Theory Research with Humans on the Loop

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20622v1
• Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 14:38:28 GMT
• Title: pAI/MSc: ML Theory Research with Humans on the Loop
• Abstract summary: pAI/MSc is an open-source, customizable, modular multi-agent system for academic research ideation.<n>It reduces by orders of the human steering required to turn a specified hypothesis into a literature-grounded, mathematically established, experimentally supported, submission-oriented manuscript draft.
• Score: 0.6335848702857036
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We present pAI/MSc, an open-source, customizable, modular multi-agent system for academic research workflows. Our goal is not autonomous scientific ideation, nor fully automated research. It is narrower and more practical: to reduce by orders of magnitude the human steering required to turn a specified hypothesis into a literature-grounded, mathematically established, experimentally supported, submission-oriented manuscript draft. pAI/MSc is built with a current emphasis on machine learning theory and adjacent quantitative fields.

Related papers

• ReasFlow: Assisting Reasoning-Centric Scientific Discovery in Applied Mathematics via a Knowledge-Based Multi-Agent System [29.871573462927643]
  We introduce ReasFlow, an end-to-end autonomous agent system for reasoning-centric scientific discovery.<n>The system unifies literature synthesis, algorithm design, theorem proving, experimentation, and manuscript preparation in a single system.<n>ReasFlow is publicly accessible via the ReasLab platform, providing a collaborative workspace for AI-assisted theoretical research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-15T13:27:20Z)
• From Solvers to Research: Large Language Model-Driven Formal Mathematics at the Research Frontier [109.93387172162984]
  We argue that the next leap in AI4Math systems requires a decisive shift from predefined problem-solvers to research agents.<n>We provide a systematic review of the field, covering datasets, auto-formalization, and proof synthesis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-08T17:46:36Z)
• AI Scientists as Engines of Discovery: A Case for Development within Reformed Institutions [0.10102237605686408]
  Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems are beginning to assist, accelerate, and partially automate scientific discovery.<n>We argue that suitably designed multi-agent systems may evolve from passive computational tools into AI scientists''<n>Such systems must be developed and deployed within a scientific ecosystem fit for purpose.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-22T05:06:29Z)
• AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide [107.0834449839233]
  We present an end-to-end analysis of AI across the complete research lifecycle.<n>We identify a sharp, stage-dependent boundary between reliable assistance and unreliable autonomy.<n>We show that greater automation can obscure rather than eliminate failure modes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T17:08:26Z)
• MIND: AI Co-Scientist for Material Research [13.842488789399743]
  MIND organizes the scientific discovery process into hypothesis refinement, experimentation, and debate-based validation.<n>For experimental verification, the system integrates Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials.<n>The modular design allows additional experimental modules to be integrated, making the framework adaptable to broader scientific research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-15T10:27:01Z)
• Towards grounded autonomous research: an end-to-end LLM mini research loop on published computational physics [3.7193230342956056]
  Recent autonomous LLM agents have demonstrated end-to-end automation of machine-learning research.<n>We focus on the smallest meaningful unit of such research, a mini research loop in which an agent reads a paper, reproduces it, critiques it, and extends it.<n>We test this loop in two complementary regimes: scale and depth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T02:06:59Z)
• Can we automatize scientific discovery in the cognitive sciences? [20.166894780789725]
  We propose a paradigm shift toward a fully automated, in silico science of the mind.<n>This framework implements every stage of the discovery cycle using Large Language Models (LLMs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-22T00:15:58Z)
• An Agentic Framework for Autonomous Materials Computation [70.24472585135929]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for accelerating scientific discovery.<n>Recent advances integrate LLMs into agentic frameworks, enabling retrieval, reasoning, and tool use for complex scientific experiments.<n>Here, we present a domain-specialized agent designed for reliable automation of first-principles materials computations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T15:03:57Z)
• Probing Scientific General Intelligence of LLMs with Scientist-Aligned Workflows [203.3527268311731]
  We present an operational SGI definition grounded in the Practical Inquiry Model (PIM)<n>We operationalize it via four scientist-aligned tasks: deep research, idea generation, dry/wet experiments, and experimental reasoning.<n>Our PIM-grounded definition, workflow-centric benchmark, and empirical insights establish a foundation for AI systems that genuinely participate in scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T12:44:36Z)
• SFR-DeepResearch: Towards Effective Reinforcement Learning for Autonomously Reasoning Single Agents [93.26456498576181]
  This paper focuses on the development of native Autonomous Single-Agent models for Deep Research.<n>Our best variant SFR-DR-20B achieves up to 28.7% on Humanity's Last Exam benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T02:07:09Z)
• From Automation to Autonomy: A Survey on Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery [67.07598263346591]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are catalyzing a paradigm shift in scientific discovery.<n>This survey systematically charts this burgeoning field, placing a central focus on the changing roles and escalating capabilities of LLMs in science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T15:41:32Z)
• Advancing AI Research Assistants with Expert-Involved Learning [84.30323604785646]
  Large language models (LLMs) and large multimodal models (LMMs) promise to accelerate biomedical discovery, yet their reliability remains unclear.<n>We introduce ARIEL (AI Research Assistant for Expert-in-the-Loop Learning), an open-source evaluation and optimization framework.<n>We find that state-of-the-art models generate fluent but incomplete summaries, whereas LMMs struggle with detailed visual reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-03T14:21:48Z)
• IRIS: Interactive Research Ideation System for Accelerating Scientific Discovery [27.218896203253987]
  IRIS is an open-source platform designed for researchers to leverage large language models (LLMs)-assisted scientific ideation.<n>IRIS incorporates innovative features to enhance ideation, including adaptive test-time compute expansion via Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), fine-grained feedback mechanism, and query-based literature synthesis.<n>We conduct a user study with researchers across diverse disciplines, validating the effectiveness of our system in enhancing ideation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-23T14:01:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.