UAU-Net: Uncertainty-aware Representation Learning and Evidential Classification for Facial Action Unit Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21227v1
• Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 02:47:24 GMT
• Title: UAU-Net: Uncertainty-aware Representation Learning and Evidential Classification for Facial Action Unit Detection
• Abstract summary: UAU-Net is an Uncertainty-aware AU detection framework that explicitly models uncertainty at both stages.<n>Experiments on BP4D and DISFA show that UAU-Net achieves strong AU detection performance.
• Score: 9.627381138509422
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Facial action unit (AU) detection remains challenging because it involves heterogeneous, AU-specific uncertainties arising at both the representation and decision stages. Recent methods have improved discriminative feature learning, but they often treat the AU representations as deterministic, overlooking uncertainty caused by visual noise, subject-dependent appearance variations, and ambiguous inter-AU relationships, all of which can substantially degrade robustness. Meanwhile, conventional point-estimation classifiers often provide poorly calibrated confidence, producing overconfident predictions, especially under the severe label imbalance typical of AU datasets. We propose UAU-Net, an Uncertainty-aware AU detection framework that explicitly models uncertainty at both stages. At the representation stage, we introduce CV-AFE, a conditional VAE (CVAE)-based AU feature extraction module that learns probabilistic AU representations by jointly estimating feature means and variances across multiple spatio-temporal scales; conditioning on AU labels further enables CV-AFE to capture uncertainty associated with inter-AU dependencies. At the decision stage, we design AB-ENN, an Asymmetric Beta Evidential Neural Network for multi-label AU detection, which parameterizes predictive uncertainty with Beta distributions and mitigates overconfidence via an asymmetric loss tailored to highly imbalanced binary labels. Extensive experiments on BP4D and DISFA show that UAU-Net achieves strong AU detection performance, and further analyses indicate that modeling uncertainty in both representation learning and evidential prediction improves robustness and reliability.

Related papers

• Exploring Agentic Tool-Calling Decisions via Uncertainty-Aligned Reinforcement Learning [63.24624171679711]
  Large language model (LLM)-based agents often make suboptimal tool-use decisions.<n>We propose TRUST, which incorporates uncertainty quantification into reward design as a repulsive force for maintaining uncertainty separation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-05T07:08:34Z)
• FACTOR: Counterfactual Training-Free Test-Time Adaptation for Open-Vocabulary Object Detection [63.91351553178842]
  FACTOR is a training-free Test-time adaptation for Open-vocabulary object detection.<n>It quantifies attribute sensitivity, semantic relevance, and prediction variation to selectively suppress attribute-dependent predictions.<n>Experiments on PASCAL-C, COCO-C, and FoggyCityscapes show that FACTOR consistently outperforms prior TTA methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-05T02:31:18Z)
• Complementing Self-Consistency with Cross-Model Disagreement for Uncertainty Quantification [41.04503562937318]
  Large language models (LLMs) often produce confident yet incorrect responses.<n>Self-consistency to estimate aleatoric uncertainty (AU) collapses when models are overconfident.<n>We show that cross-model semantic disagreement is higher on incorrect answers precisely when AU is low.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-18T19:00:27Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Depression Estimation via Disentangled Evidential Learning [50.22167852149165]
  We propose EviDep, an evidential learning framework that jointly quantifies depression severity.<n>EviDep enforces strict information integrity to guarantee robust evidence synthesis.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art predictive accuracy and superior uncertainty calibration, delivering a robust fail-safe mechanism for trustworthy clinical screening.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T13:27:11Z)
• Rethinking Uncertainty Quantification and Entanglement in Image Segmentation [8.952491535016444]
  Uncertainty (UQ) is crucial in safety-critical applications such as medical image segmentation.<n>Many methods exist for modeling AU (such as Probabilistic UNet, Diffusion) and EU (such as ensembles, MC Dropout) but it is unclear how they interact when combined.<n>We present a comprehensive empirical study covering a broad range of AU-EU model combinations, propose a metric to quantify uncertainty entanglement, and evaluate both across downstream UQ tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T11:43:26Z)
• Agentic Uncertainty Quantification [76.94013626702183]
  We propose a unified Dual-Process Agentic UQ (AUQ) framework that transforms verbalized uncertainty into active, bi-directional control signals.<n>Our architecture comprises two complementary mechanisms: System 1 (Uncertainty-Aware Memory, UAM), which implicitly propagates verbalized confidence and semantic explanations to prevent blind decision-making; and System 2 (Uncertainty-Aware Reflection, UAR), which utilizes these explanations as rational cues to trigger targeted inference-time resolution only when necessary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T07:16:26Z)
• Decision-Aware Trust Signal Alignment for SOC Alert Triage [0.0]
  The present paper presents a decision-sensitive trust signal correspondence scheme of SOC alert triage.<n>The framework combines confidence that has been calibrated, lightweight uncertainty cues, and cost-sensitive decision thresholds into coherent decision-support layer.<n>We show that false negatives are greatly amplified by the presence of misaligned displays of confidence, whereas cost weighted loss decreases by orders of magnitude between models with decision aligned trust signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T01:41:54Z)
• Towards Adversarial Robustness and Uncertainty Quantification in DINOv2-based Few-Shot Anomaly Detection [6.288045889067255]
  Foundation models such as DINOv2 have shown strong performance in few-shot anomaly detection.<n>We present one of the first systematic studies of adversarial attacks and uncertainty estimation in this setting.<n>We find that raw anomaly scores are poorly calibrated, revealing a gap between confidence and correctness that limits safety-critical use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T15:06:45Z)
• FADEL: Uncertainty-aware Fake Audio Detection with Evidential Deep Learning [9.960675988638805]
  We propose a novel framework called fake audio detection with evidential learning (FADEL)<n>FADEL incorporates model uncertainty into its predictions, thereby leading to more robust performance in OOD scenarios.<n>We demonstrate the validity of uncertainty estimation by analyzing a strong correlation between average uncertainty and equal error rate (EER) across different spoofing algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T07:40:35Z)
• Facial Action Unit Detection by Adaptively Constraining Self-Attention and Causally Deconfounding Sample [53.23474626420103]
  Facial action unit (AU) detection remains a challenging task, due to the subtlety, dynamics, and diversity of AUs. We propose a novel AU detection framework called AC2D by adaptively constraining self-attention weight distribution. Our method achieves competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art AU detection approaches on challenging benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T05:51:24Z)
• Be Your Own Neighborhood: Detecting Adversarial Example by the Neighborhood Relations Built on Self-Supervised Learning [64.78972193105443]
  This paper presents a novel AE detection framework, named trustworthy for predictions. performs the detection by distinguishing the AE's abnormal relation with its augmented versions. An off-the-shelf Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) model is used to extract the representation and predict the label.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-31T08:18:44Z)
• Uncertainty-Driven Action Quality Assessment [11.958132175629368]
  We propose a novel probabilistic model, named Uncertainty-Driven AQA (UD-AQA), to capture the diversity among multiple judge scores.<n>We generate the estimation of uncertainty for each prediction, which is employed to re-weight AQA regression loss.<n>Our proposed method achieves competitive results on three benchmarks including the Olympic events MTL-AQA and FineDiving, and the surgical skill JIGSAWS datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-29T07:21:15Z)
• Exploring Robustness of Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in Semantic Segmentation [74.05906222376608]
  We propose adversarial self-supervision UDA (or ASSUDA) that maximizes the agreement between clean images and their adversarial examples by a contrastive loss in the output space. This paper is rooted in two observations: (i) the robustness of UDA methods in semantic segmentation remains unexplored, which pose a security concern in this field; and (ii) although commonly used self-supervision (e.g., rotation and jigsaw) benefits image tasks such as classification and recognition, they fail to provide the critical supervision signals that could learn discriminative representation for segmentation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-23T01:50:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.