A Stackelberg Model for Hybridization in Cryptography

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21436v2
• Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 09:42:47 GMT
• Title: A Stackelberg Model for Hybridization in Cryptography
• Abstract summary: cryptography problems can be examined through the prism of game theory.<n>In this setting, the agent aiming to protect a message is called the defender, while the one attempting to decrypt it, generally for malicious purposes, is the attacker.<n>We model this interaction as a Stackelberg cryptographic hybridization problem under resource constraints.
• Score: 1.455794041011697
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Similar to a strategic interaction between rational and intelligent agents, cryptography problems can be examined through the prism of game theory. In this setting, the agent aiming to protect a message is called the defender, while the one attempting to decrypt it, generally for malicious purposes, is the attacker. To strengthen security in cryptography, various strategies have been developed, among which hybridization stands out as a key concept in modern cryptographic design. This strategy allows the defender to select among different encryption algorithms (classical, post-quantum, or hybrid) while carefully balancing security and operational costs. On the other side, the attacker, limited by available resources, chooses cryptanalysis methods capable of breaching the selected algorithm. We model this interaction as a Stackelberg cryptographic hybridization problem under resource constraints. Here, the defender randomizes over encryption algorithms, and the attacker observes the choice before selecting suitable cryptanalysis methods. The attacker's decision is framed as a conditional optimization problem, which we refer to as the ``attacker subgame''. We then propose a dynamic programming approach for the attacker's subgame, while the defender's Stackelberg optimization is formulated as a linear program.

Related papers

• CryptanalysisBench: Can LLMs do Cryptanalysis? [76.79639292270497]
  We introduce CryptanalysisBench, 191 tasks across six families of cryptographic primitives.<n>Our benchmark consists of three tiers: (i) primitives with known practical breaks; (ii) primitives with no known practical break, evaluated both at full strength and as scaled-down variants.<n>Five frontier models break 65%-86% of Tier 1 schemes, 6-12 Tier-2 schemes at full strength, and 24-61 across all scaled-down variants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-20T22:09:40Z)
• Evaluating Selective Encryption Against Gradient Inversion Attacks [15.000605214632243]
  Gradient inversion attacks pose significant privacy threats to distributed training frameworks such as federated learning.<n>This paper systematically evaluates selective encryption methods with different significance metrics against state-of-the-art attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T07:31:43Z)
• Post-Quantum Homomorphic Encryption: A Case for Code-Based Alternatives [0.6749750044497732]
  Homomorphic Encryption (HE) allows secure and privacy-protected computation on encrypted data without the need to decrypt it.<n>Most of the current PQHE algorithms are secured by lattice-based problems.<n>Code-based encryption is a novel way to diversify post-quantum algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T06:49:22Z)
• Cloning Games, Black Holes and Cryptography [50.022147589030304]
  We introduce a new toolkit for analyzing cloning games.<n>This framework allows us to analyze a new cloning game based on binary phase states.<n>We show that the binary phase variantally optimal bound offers quantitative insights into information scrambling in idealized models of black holes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T14:09:32Z)
• Lightweight Public Key Encryption in Post-Quantum Computing Era [0.0]
  Confidentiality in our digital world is based on the security of cryptographic algorithms. In the course of technological progress with quantum computers, the protective function of common encryption algorithms is threatened. Our concept describes the transformation of a classical asymmetric encryption method to a modern complexity class.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-24T21:06:42Z)
• Adversarial Attacks on Gaussian Process Bandits [47.84198626686564]
  We propose various adversarial attack methods with differing assumptions on the attacker's strength and prior information. Our goal is to understand adversarial attacks on GP bandits from both a theoretical and practical perspective. We demonstrate that adversarial attacks on GP bandits can succeed in forcing the algorithm towards $mathcalR_rm target$ even with a low attack budget.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-16T02:39:10Z)
• Learning Generative Deception Strategies in Combinatorial Masking Games [27.2744631811653]
  One way deception can be employed is through obscuring, or masking, some of the information about how systems are configured. We present a novel game-theoretic model of the resulting defender-attacker interaction, where the defender chooses a subset of attributes to mask, while the attacker responds by choosing an exploit to execute. We present a novel highly scalable approach for approximately solving such games by representing the strategies of both players as neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-23T20:42:44Z)
• Recovering AES Keys with a Deep Cold Boot Attack [91.22679787578438]
  Cold boot attacks inspect the corrupted random access memory soon after the power has been shut down. In this work, we combine a novel cryptographic variant of a deep error correcting code technique with a modified SAT solver scheme to apply the attack on AES keys. Our results show that our methods outperform the state of the art attack methods by a very large margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T07:57:01Z)
• Robust Stochastic Linear Contextual Bandits Under Adversarial Attacks [81.13338949407205]
  Recent works show that optimal bandit algorithms are vulnerable to adversarial attacks and can fail completely in the presence of attacks. Existing robust bandit algorithms only work for the non-contextual setting under the attack of rewards. We provide the first robust bandit algorithm for linear contextual bandit setting under a fully adaptive and omniscient attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-05T22:20:34Z)
• Online Adversarial Attacks [57.448101834579624]
  We formalize the online adversarial attack problem, emphasizing two key elements found in real-world use-cases. We first rigorously analyze a deterministic variant of the online threat model. We then propose algoname, a simple yet practical algorithm yielding a provably better competitive ratio for $k=2$ over the current best single threshold algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-02T20:36:04Z)
• Composite Adversarial Attacks [57.293211764569996]
  Adversarial attack is a technique for deceiving Machine Learning (ML) models. In this paper, a new procedure called Composite Adrial Attack (CAA) is proposed for automatically searching the best combination of attack algorithms. CAA beats 10 top attackers on 11 diverse defenses with less elapsed time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T03:21:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.