Large Language Models Decide Early and Explain Later

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22266v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 06:26:24 GMT
• Title: Large Language Models Decide Early and Explain Later
• Abstract summary: We study the evolution of predicted answers over reasoning steps using forced answer completion.<n>We show that simples, including probe-based stopping, can reduce reasoning token usage by 500 tokens per query.
• Score: 47.20810161393936
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models often achieve strong performance by generating long intermediate chain-of-thought reasoning. However, it remains unclear when a model's final answer is actually determined during generation. If the answer is already fixed at an intermediate stage, subsequent reasoning tokens may constitute post-decision explanation, increasing inference cost and latency without improving correctness. We study the evolution of predicted answers over reasoning steps using forced answer completion, which elicits the model's intermediate predictions at partial reasoning prefixes. Focusing on Qwen3-4B and averaging results across all datasets considered, we find that predicted answers change in only 32% of queries. Moreover, once the final answer switch occurs, the model generates an average of 760 additional reasoning tokens per query, accounting for a substantial fraction of the total reasoning budget. Motivated by these findings, we investigate early stopping strategies that halt generation once the answer has stabilized. We show that simple heuristics, including probe-based stopping, can reduce reasoning token usage by 500 tokens per query while incurring only a 2% drop in accuracy. Together, our results indicate that a large portion of chain-of-thought generation is redundant and can be reduced with minimal impact on performance.

Related papers

• Beyond the Commitment Boundary: Probing Epiphenomenal Chain-of-Thought in Large Reasoning Models [16.372524974789492]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning is the dominant paradigm for inference-time scaling in language models.<n>We study how answers form across the reasoning traces of several model families.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-11T17:21:16Z)
• Thinking Past the Answer: Evaluating Harmful Overthinking in Large Reasoning Models [38.84286306535778]
  We show that stopping at the first correct prefix improves accuracy over standard reasoning up to 21%.<n>While common efficiency strategies like early stopping substantially reduce verbose overthinking, they fail to mitigate harmful overthinking.<n>Our findings generalize to language-only reasoning benchmarks, highlighting harmful overthinking as a broader reliability risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T19:59:27Z)
• Pause or Fabricate? Training Language Models for Grounded Reasoning [50.104657152302956]
  We propose Grounded Reasoning via Interactive Reinforcement Learning (GRIL) for grounded reasoning under incomplete information.<n>GRIL decomposes the reasoning process into two stages: clarify and pause, which identifies whether the available information is sufficient, and grounded reasoning, which performs task solving once the necessary premises are established.<n>Experiments on GSM8K-Insufficient and MetaMATH-Insufficient show that GRIL significantly improves premise detection (up to 45%), leading to a 30% increase in task success while reducing average response length by over 20%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T16:45:29Z)
• Early Stopping for Large Reasoning Models via Confidence Dynamics [55.67938134245981]
  Large reasoning models rely on long chain-of-thought generation to solve complex problems.<n>Key challenge is determining when the model should stop reasoning and produce the final answer.<n>We propose CoDE-Stop, an early stopping method that leverages the dynamics of intermediate answer confidence to decide when to terminate reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-06T17:59:45Z)
• Probing the Trajectories of Reasoning Traces in Large Language Models [4.599673637363014]
  We propose a protocol to probe the trajectories of reasoning traces in large language models.<n>We find that accuracy and decision commitment consistently increase as the percentage of provided reasoning tokens grows.<n>We show that trajectory probing provides diagnostics for efficient and safer deployment of reasoning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T16:45:16Z)
• Temporal Predictors of Outcome in Reasoning Language Models [0.0]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) paradigm uses the elicitation of step-by-step rationales as a proxy for reasoning.<n>We show that, for harder questions, a drop in predictive accuracy highlights a selection artifact.<n>Overall, our results imply that for reasoning models, internal self-assessment of success tends to emerge after only a few tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-03T08:57:18Z)
• Measuring Reasoning Utility in LLMs via Conditional Entropy Reduction [3.9481110638616617]
  We measure the model's uncertainty on the answer span Y at each reasoning step using conditional entropy.<n>We also corroborate that incorrect reasoning paths tend to be longer than correct ones, suggesting that longer reasoning does not necessarily yield better outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T03:43:38Z)
• Stop Spinning Wheels: Mitigating LLM Overthinking via Mining Patterns for Early Reasoning Exit [114.83867400179354]
  Overthinking can degrade overall performance of large language models.<n>We categorize reasoning into three stages: insufficient exploration stage, compensatory reasoning stage, and reasoning convergence stage.<n>We develop a lightweight thresholding strategy based on rules to improve reasoning accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-25T03:17:17Z)
• Lost at the Beginning of Reasoning [85.17612793300238]
  We show that the first reasoning step exerts a disproportionately large influence on the final prediction.<n>We propose an efficient sampling strategy that leverages a reward model to identify and retain high-quality first reasoning steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T09:53:57Z)
• Answer Convergence as a Signal for Early Stopping in Reasoning [7.51755942515969]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting enhances reasoning in large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose three inference-time strategies to improve efficiency: (1) early stopping via answer consistency, (2) boosting the probability of generating end-of-reasoning signals, and (3) a supervised method that learns when to stop based on internal activations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T07:20:54Z)
• Beyond the Last Answer: Your Reasoning Trace Uncovers More than You Think [51.0691253204425]
  We analyze intermediate reasoning steps, termed subthoughts, to answer two questions: Does the final answer reliably represent the model's optimal conclusion?<n>Our approach involves segmenting a reasoning trace into sequential subthoughts based on linguistic cues.<n>We find that aggregating these answers by selecting the most frequent one (the mode) often yields significantly higher accuracy compared to relying solely on the answer derived from the original complete trace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-29T12:39:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.