ArmSSL: Adversarial Robust Black-Box Watermarking for Self-Supervised Learning Pre-trained Encoders

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22550v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 13:40:25 GMT
• Title: ArmSSL: Adversarial Robust Black-Box Watermarking for Self-Supervised Learning Pre-trained Encoders
• Abstract summary: ArmSSL is an SSL watermarking framework that assures black-box verifiability and adversarial robustness.<n>We show that ArmSSL achieves superior ownership verification, negligible utility degradation, and strong robustness against various adversarial detection and removal.
• Score: 15.215357196666126
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Self-supervised learning (SSL) encoders are invaluable intellectual property (IP). However, no existing SSL watermarking for IP protection can concurrently satisfy the following two practical requirements: (1) provide ownership verification capability under black-box suspect model access once the stolen encoders are used in downstream tasks; (2) be robust under adversarial watermark detection or removal, because the watermark samples form a distinguishable out-of-distribution (OOD) cluster. We propose ArmSSL, an SSL watermarking framework that assures black-box verifiability and adversarial robustness while preserving utility. For verification, we introduce paired discrepancy enlargement, enforcing feature-space orthogonality between the clean and its watermark counterpart to produce a reliable verification signal in black-box against the suspect model. For adversarial robustness, ArmSSL integrates latent representation entanglement and distribution alignment to suppress the OOD clustering. The former entangles watermark representations with clean representations (i.e., from non-source-class) to avoid forming a dense cluster of watermark samples, while the latter minimizes the distributional discrepancy between watermark and clean representations, thereby disguising watermark samples as natural in-distribution data. For utility, a reference-guided watermark tuning strategy is designed to allow the watermark to be learned as a small side task without affecting the main task by aligning the watermarked encoder's outputs with those of the original clean encoder on normal data. Extensive experiments across five mainstream SSL frameworks and nine benchmark datasets, along with end-to-end comparisons with SOTAs, demonstrate that ArmSSL achieves superior ownership verification, negligible utility degradation, and strong robustness against various adversarial detection and removal.

Related papers

• SEW: Strengthening Robustness of Black-box DNN Watermarking via Specificity Enhancement [19.10516412427928]
  We introduce Specificity-Enhanced Watermarking (SEW), a new method that improves specificity by reducing the association between the watermark and approximate keys.<n>SEW effectively defends against six state-of-the-art removal attacks, while maintaining model usability and watermark verification performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T10:55:27Z)
• SemBind: Binding Diffusion Watermarks to Semantics Against Black-Box Forgery Attacks [74.76909939060833]
  Black-box forgery attacks pose outsized risk to provenance and trust.<n>We propose SemBind, a framework for latent-based watermarks that resists black-box forgery.<n>We show that SemBind-enabled anti-forgery variants markedly reduce false acceptance under black-box forgery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T07:02:40Z)
• AuthenLoRA: Entangling Stylization with Imperceptible Watermarks for Copyright-Secure LoRA Adapters [52.556959321030966]
  Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) offers an efficient paradigm for customizing diffusion models.<n>Existing watermarking techniques either target base models or verify LoRA modules themselves.<n>We propose AuthenLoRA, a unified watermarking framework that embeds imperceptible, traceable watermarks directly into the LoRA training process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T09:48:11Z)
• SEAL: Subspace-Anchored Watermarks for LLM Ownership [12.022506016268112]
  We propose SEAL, a subspace-anchored watermarking framework for large language models.<n> SEAL embeds multi-bit signatures directly into the model's latent representational space, supporting both white-box and black-box verification scenarios.<n>We conduct comprehensive experiments on multiple benchmark datasets and six prominent LLMs to demonstrate SEAL's superior effectiveness, fidelity, efficiency, and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-14T14:44:11Z)
• SSCL-BW: Sample-Specific Clean-Label Backdoor Watermarking for Dataset Ownership Verification [8.045712223215542]
  This paper proposes a sample-specific clean-label backdoor watermarking (i.e., SSCL-BW)<n>By training a U-Net-based watermarked sample generator, this method generates unique watermarks for each sample.<n>Experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method and its robustness against potential watermark removal attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T12:13:53Z)
• Position: LLM Watermarking Should Align Stakeholders' Incentives for Practical Adoption [94.887133335656]
  We revisit three classes of watermarking through this lens.<n>emphLLM text watermarking offers modest provider benefit when framed solely as an anti-misuse tool.<n>emphIn-context watermarking (ICW) is tailored for trusted parties, such as conference organizers or educators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T06:34:51Z)
• An Ensemble Framework for Unbiased Language Model Watermarking [60.99969104552168]
  We propose ENS, a novel ensemble framework that enhances the detectability and robustness of unbiased watermarks.<n>ENS sequentially composes multiple independent watermark instances, each governed by a distinct key, to amplify the watermark signal.<n> Empirical evaluations show that ENS substantially reduces the number of tokens needed for reliable detection and increases resistance to smoothing and paraphrasing attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-28T19:37:44Z)
• StableGuard: Towards Unified Copyright Protection and Tamper Localization in Latent Diffusion Models [55.05404953041403]
  We propose a novel framework that seamlessly integrates a binary watermark into the diffusion generation process.<n>We show that StableGuard consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods in image fidelity, watermark verification, and tampering localization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T16:35:19Z)
• Character-Level Perturbations Disrupt LLM Watermarks [64.60090923837701]
  We formalize the system model for Large Language Model (LLM) watermarking.<n>We characterize two realistic threat models constrained on limited access to the watermark detector.<n>We demonstrate character-level perturbations are significantly more effective for watermark removal under the most restrictive threat model.<n> Experiments confirm the superiority of character-level perturbations and the effectiveness of the Genetic Algorithm (GA) in removing watermarks under realistic constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T02:50:07Z)
• ChainMarks: Securing DNN Watermark with Cryptographic Chain [11.692176144467513]
  Deep neural network (DNN) models are being used to protect the intellectual property of model owners.<n>Recent studies have shown that existing watermarking schemes are vulnerable to watermark removal and ambiguity attacks.<n>We propose ChainMarks, which generates secure and robust watermarks by introducing a cryptographic chain into the trigger inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T06:30:46Z)
• Transferable Watermarking to Self-supervised Pre-trained Graph Encoders by Trigger Embeddings [43.067822791795095]
  Graph Self-supervised Learning (GSSL) enables to pre-train foundation graph encoders.<n>Easy-to-plug-in nature of such encoders makes them vulnerable to copyright infringement.<n>We develop a novel watermarking framework to protect graph encoders in GSSL settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T03:16:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.