RedVLA: Physical Red Teaming for Vision-Language-Action Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22591v1
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 14:18:23 GMT
- Title: RedVLA: Physical Red Teaming for Vision-Language-Action Models
- Abstract summary: We propose textbfRedVLA, the first red teaming framework for physical safety in VLA models.<n>RedVLA uncovers diverse unsafe behaviors and achieves the ASR up to 95.5% within 10 optimization iterations.<n>We further propose SimpleVLA-Guard, a lightweight safety guard built from RedVLA-generated data.
- Score: 23.095522907166195
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The real-world deployment of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models remains limited by the risk of unpredictable and irreversible physical harm. However, we currently lack effective mechanisms to proactively detect these physical safety risks before deployment. To address this gap, we propose \textbf{RedVLA}, the first red teaming framework for physical safety in VLA models. We systematically uncover unsafe behaviors through a two-stage process: (I) \textbf{Risk Scenario Synthesis} constructs a valid and task-feasible initial risk scene. Specifically, it identifies critical interaction regions from benign trajectories and positions the risk factor within these regions, aiming to entangle it with the VLA's execution flow and elicit a target unsafe behavior. (II) \textbf{Risk Amplification} ensures stable elicitation across heterogeneous models. It iteratively refines the risk factor state through gradient-free optimization guided by trajectory features. Experiments on six representative VLA models show that RedVLA uncovers diverse unsafe behaviors and achieves the ASR up to 95.5\% within 10 optimization iterations. To mitigate these risks, we further propose SimpleVLA-Guard, a lightweight safety guard built from RedVLA-generated data. Our data, assets, and code are available \href{https://redvla.github.io}{here}.
Related papers
- Do Models Share Safety Representations? Cross-Model Steering for Safe Visual Generation [52.122731171289665]
We introduce the first framework for cross-model safety steering.<n>Our pipeline never accesses unsafe data on the target side.<n>We evaluate our approach in text-to-image and text-to-video generation across diverse source-target model pairs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-03T18:00:04Z) - HazardArena: Evaluating Semantic Safety in Vision-Language-Action Models [87.35765363039638]
We introduce HazardArena, a benchmark designed to evaluate semantic safety in Vision-Language-Action models.<n>We find that VLA models trained exclusively on safe scenarios often fail to behave safely when evaluated in their corresponding unsafe counterparts.<n>We propose a training-free Safety Option Layer that constrains action execution using semantic attributes or a vision-language judge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-14T08:32:02Z) - Uncovering Linguistic Fragility in Vision-Language-Action Models via Diversity-Aware Red Teaming [64.48633529149579]
We propose a novel framework to expose the vulnerabilities of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models against linguistic variations.<n>Our method reduces the average task success rate from 93.33% to 5.85%, demonstrating a scalable approach to stress-testing VLA agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-07T08:43:36Z) - Principled Steering via Null-space Projection for Jailbreak Defense in Vision-Language Models [71.11171576590134]
Vision-language models can be easily induced by visual jailbreak attacks to generate harmful content.<n>We propose NullSteer, a null-space projected activation defense framework.<n>We show that NullSteer significantly reduces harmful outputs under various jailbreak attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-23T15:23:23Z) - HomeGuard: VLM-based Embodied Safeguard for Identifying Contextual Risk in Household Task [42.665798473119516]
We propose an architecture-agnostic safeguard featuring Context-Guided Chain-of-Thought (CG-CoT)<n>CG-CoT decomposes risk assessment into active perception that sequentially anchors attention to interaction targets and relevant spatial neighborhoods.<n> Experiments demonstrate that our model HomeGuard significantly enhances safety, improving risk match rates by over 30% compared to base models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-15T13:09:43Z) - AttackVLA: Benchmarking Adversarial and Backdoor Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models [60.39655329875822]
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models enable robots to interpret natural-language instructions and perform diverse tasks.<n>Despite growing interest in attacking such models, the effectiveness of existing techniques remains unclear.<n>We propose AttackVLA, a unified framework that aligns with the VLA development lifecycle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-15T10:30:46Z) - Shape it Up! Restoring LLM Safety during Finetuning [65.75757313781104]
Finetuning large language models (LLMs) enables user-specific customization but introduces critical safety risks.<n>We propose dynamic safety shaping (DSS), a framework that uses fine-grained safety signals to reinforce learning from safe segments of a response while suppressing unsafe content.<n>We present STAR-DSS, guided by STAR scores, that robustly mitigates finetuning risks and delivers substantial safety improvements across diverse threats, datasets, and model families.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T18:05:16Z) - BadVLA: Towards Backdoor Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models via Objective-Decoupled Optimization [45.97834622654751]
BadVLA is a backdoor attack method based on Objective-Decoupled Optimization.<n>We show that BadVLA consistently achieves near-100% attack success rates with minimal impact on clean task accuracy.<n>Our work offers the first systematic investigation of backdoor vulnerabilities in VLA models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T13:12:46Z) - SafeVLA: Towards Safety Alignment of Vision-Language-Action Model via Constrained Learning [30.037309138373754]
Vision-language-action models (VLAs) show potential as generalist robot policies.<n>These models pose extreme safety challenges during real-world deployment, including the risk of harm to the environment, the robot itself, and humans.<n>We address this by exploring an integrated safety approach (ISA), systematically modeling safety requirements, then actively eliciting diverse unsafe behaviors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-05T13:16:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.