Peer Identity Bias in Multi-Agent LLM Evaluation: An Empirical Study Using the TRUST Democratic Discourse Analysis Pipeline

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22971v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 19:32:01 GMT
• Title: Peer Identity Bias in Multi-Agent LLM Evaluation: An Empirical Study Using the TRUST Democratic Discourse Analysis Pipeline
• Abstract summary: We provide the first systematic measurement of identity-dependent scoring bias across all active identity exposure channels in TRUST.<n>We find that single-channel anonymization produces near-zero bias effects, because individual channels act in opposite directions and cancel each other out.<n>One tested model exhibits baseline sycophancy two to three times higher than the others and near-zero deliberative conflict on ideological topics.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The TRUST democratic discourse analysis pipeline exposes its large language model (LLM) components to peer model identity through multiple structural channels -- a design feature whose bias implications have not previously been empirically tested. We provide the first systematic measurement of identity-dependent scoring bias across all active identity exposure channels in TRUST, crossing four model families with two anonymization scopes across 30 political statements. The central finding is that single-channel anonymization produces near-zero bias effects, because individual channels act in opposite directions and cancel each other out -- a result that would lead an evaluator to conclude that identity bias is absent when it is not. Only full-pipeline anonymization reveals the true pattern: homogeneous ensembles amplify identity-driven sycophancy when model identity is fully visible, while the heterogeneous production configuration shows the reverse. Model choice matters independently: one tested model exhibits baseline sycophancy two to three times higher than the others and near-zero deliberative conflict on ideological topics, making it structurally unsuitable for pipelines where genuine inter-role disagreement is the intended quality mechanism. Three practical conclusions follow. First, heterogeneous model ensembles are structurally more robust than homogeneous ones, achieving higher consensus rates and lower identity amplification. Second, full-pipeline anonymization is required for valid bias measurement -- partial anonymization is insufficient and actively misleading. Third, these findings have direct implications for the validation of multi-agent LLM systems in quality-critical applications: a system validated under partial anonymization or with a homogeneous ensemble may pass validation while retaining structural identity bias invisible to single-channel measurement.

Related papers

• Tri-PvP: Exposing Modality Bias in Omni-Modal Large Language Models through Perceptual-Propositional Evidence Conflicts [49.97842835825998]
  Existing benchmarks conflate two forms of evidence within a single modality: perceptual signals and propositional signals.<n>We introduce Tri-PvP, a benchmark crossing vision, audio, and text, where vision and audio each take perceptual or propositional form.<n>We find robust visual bias across most models and evidence-type conditions. Crucially, we reveal a systematic asymmetry in evidence-form bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-05T10:33:58Z)
• Dual-Branch Cross-Projection Debiasing through Diffusion-based Disentanglement [66.67463557274358]
  Foundation models trained on biased datasets often rely on spurious correlations between target labels and non-causal attributes.<n>We introduce Confidence-guided Concept Mining (CBCM) to identify reliable spurious attributes without attribute annotations.<n>We propose Dual-branch Cross-projection Debiasing (DCD), a prompt-tuning framework that separates target and spurious representations into two branches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-23T05:28:47Z)
• Traits Run Deeper: Trait-Specific Asymmetric Fusion for Personality Assessment [53.50824432699408]
  Traits Run Deeper is a novel personality assessment framework.<n>It consists of three components: the Multimodal Foundation Representation (MFR), the Trait-Specific Modality Fusion (TSMF) and the Distribution-Calibrated Personality Regression (DCPR)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-09T06:38:36Z)
• Identity-Decoupled Anonymization for Visual Evidence in Multi-modal Retrieval-Augmented Generation [9.39195684989942]
  Identity-Decoupled MRAG is a framework that interposes a generative anonymization module between retrieval and generation.<n>Our approach consists of three components: (i)a disentangled variational encoder that factorizes each face into an identity code and a spatially-structured attribute code, regularized by a mutual-information penalty and a gradient-based independence term; (ii)a manifold-aware rejection sampler that replaces the identity code with a synthetic one guaranteed to be both distinct from the original and realistic; and (iii)a conditional latent diffusion generator that synthesizes the anonymized face from the replacement identity and the
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-26T07:42:33Z)
• Beyond Nodes vs. Edges: A Multi-View Fusion Framework for Provenance-Based Intrusion Detection [6.343815622517112]
  PROVfusion is a multi-view anomaly fusion framework for provenance-based intrusion detection.<n>It fuses heterogeneous anomaly signals through lightweight fusion schemes and determines the final anomaly decisions through a voting-based integration process.<n>Experiments on nine widely used benchmark entity datasets demonstrate that PROVfusion achieves higher detection accuracy and lower false-positive rates than single node- and edge-centric baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-16T06:40:50Z)
• Quantifying Model Uniqueness in Heterogeneous AI Ecosystems [1.1162481475388237]
  We introduce a statistical framework for auditing model uniqueness based on In-Silico Quasi-Experimental Design.<n>By enforcing matched interventions across models, we isolate intrinsic model identity and quantify uniqueness as the Peer-Inexpressible Residual (PIER)<n>These results move trustworthy AI beyond explaining single models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T13:41:53Z)
• Towards Unification of Hallucination Detection and Fact Verification for Large Language Models [31.407333541614296]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently exhibit hallucinations, generating content that appears fluent but is factually incorrect.<n>To address this challenge, two distinct research paradigms have emerged: model-centric Hallucination Detection (HD) and text-centric Fact Verification (FV)<n>We introduce UniFact, a unified evaluation framework that enables direct, instance-level comparison between FV and HD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T13:51:01Z)
• Beyond Inference Intervention: Identity-Decoupled Diffusion for Face Anonymization [55.29071072675132]
  Face anonymization aims to conceal identity information while preserving non-identity attributes.<n>We propose textbfIDsuperscript2Face, a training-centric anonymization framework.<n>We show that IDtextsuperscript2Face outperforms existing methods in visual quality, identity suppression, and utility preservation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T09:28:12Z)
• RoboView-Bias: Benchmarking Visual Bias in Embodied Agents for Robotic Manipulation [67.38036090822982]
  We propose RoboView-Bias, the first benchmark specifically designed to quantify visual bias in robotic manipulation.<n>We create 2,127 task instances that enable robust measurement of biases induced by individual visual factors and their interactions.<n>Our results highlight that systematic analysis of visual bias is a prerequisite for developing safe and reliable general-purpose embodied agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T13:53:25Z)
• Fair Deepfake Detectors Can Generalize [51.21167546843708]
  We show that controlling for confounders (data distribution and model capacity) enables improved generalization via fairness interventions.<n>Motivated by this insight, we propose Demographic Attribute-insensitive Intervention Detection (DAID), a plug-and-play framework composed of: i) Demographic-aware data rebalancing, which employs inverse-propensity weighting and subgroup-wise feature normalization to neutralize distributional biases; and ii) Demographic-agnostic feature aggregation, which uses a novel alignment loss to suppress sensitive-attribute signals.<n>DAID consistently achieves superior performance in both fairness and generalization compared to several state-of-the-art
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T14:10:02Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Stable Bias: Analyzing Societal Representations in Diffusion Models [72.27121528451528]
  We propose a new method for exploring the social biases in Text-to-Image (TTI) systems. Our approach relies on characterizing the variation in generated images triggered by enumerating gender and ethnicity markers in the prompts. We leverage this method to analyze images generated by 3 popular TTI systems and find that while all of their outputs show correlations with US labor demographics, they also consistently under-represent marginalized identities to different extents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T19:32:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.