Grounding Before Generalizing: How AI Differs from Humans in Causal Transfer

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24062v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 05:37:53 GMT
• Title: Grounding Before Generalizing: How AI Differs from Humans in Causal Transfer
• Abstract summary: This study investigates whether state-of-the-art AI models possess human-like mechanisms for abstract causal structure transfer.<n>We show that models exhibit fundamentally delayed or absent transfer of Common Cause (CC) and Common Effect (CE) structures.<n>These findings reveal that large-scale statistical learning does not produce the decontextualized causal schemas underpinning human analogical reasoning.
• Score: 47.76679214811589
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Extracting abstract causal structures and applying them to novel situations is a hallmark of human intelligence. While Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision Language Models (VLMs) have shown strong performance on a wide range of reasoning tasks, their capacity for interactive causal learning -- inducing latent structures through sequential exploration and transferring them across contexts -- remains uncharacterized. Human learners accomplish such transfer after minimal exposure, whereas classical Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents fail catastrophically. Whether state-of-the-art Artificial Intelligence (AI) models possess human-like mechanisms for abstract causal structure transfer is an open question. Using the OpenLock paradigm requiring sequential discovery of Common Cause (CC) and Common Effect (CE) structures, here we show that models exhibit fundamentally delayed or absent transfer: even successful models require initial environmental-specific mapping -- what we term environmental grounding -- before efficiency gains emerge, whereas humans leverage prior structural knowledge from the very first solution attempt. In the text-only condition, models matched or exceeded human discovery efficiency. In contrast, visual information -- in both the image-only and text-and-image conditions -- overall degraded rather than enhanced performance, revealing a broad reliance on symbolic processing rather than integrated multimodal reasoning. Models further exhibited systematic CC/CE asymmetries absent in humans, suggesting heuristic biases rather than direction-neutral causal abstraction. These findings reveal that large-scale statistical learning does not produce the decontextualized causal schemas underpinning human analogical reasoning, establishing grounding-dependent transfer as a fundamental limitation of current LLMs and VLMs.

Related papers

• An Alternative Trajectory for Generative AI [4.176445342688645]
  We propose an alternative trajectory based on domain-specific superintelligence.<n>Rather than a single giant generalist model, we envision "societies of DSS models"<n>This paradigm shift decouples capability from size, enabling intelligence to migrate from energy-intensive data centers to secure, on-device experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-14T22:33:28Z)
• A Brain-like Synergistic Core in LLMs Drives Behaviour and Learning [50.68188138112555]
  We show that large language models spontaneously develop synergistic cores.<n>We find that areas in middle layers exhibit synergistic processing while early and late layers rely on redundancy.<n>This convergence suggests that synergistic information processing is a fundamental property of intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-11T10:48:35Z)
• Think Visually, Reason Textually: Vision-Language Synergy in ARC [94.15522924153264]
  ARC-AGI is a rigorous testbed for conceptual rule induction and transfer to novel tasks.<n>Most existing methods treat ARC-AGI as a purely textual reasoning task, overlooking the fact that humans rely heavily on visual abstraction.<n>We introduce two synergistic strategies: Vision-Language Synergy Reasoning (VLSR) and Modality-Switch Self-Correction (MSSC)<n>Our findings suggest that unifying visual abstraction with linguistic reasoning is a crucial step toward achieving generalizable, human-like intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T18:59:04Z)
• Failure Modes of LLMs for Causal Reasoning on Narratives [51.19592551510628]
  We investigate the interaction between world knowledge and logical reasoning.<n>We find that state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) often rely on superficial generalizations.<n>We show that simple reformulations of the task can elicit more robust reasoning behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T12:48:58Z)
• Identifiable Causal Representation Learning: Unsupervised, Multi-View, and Multi-Environment [10.814585613336778]
  Causal representation learning aims to combine the core strengths of machine learning and causality. This thesis investigates what is possible for CRL without direct supervision, and thus contributes to its theoretical foundations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T09:14:40Z)
• Position: Stop Making Unscientific AGI Performance Claims [6.343515088115924]
  Developments in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) have created a 'perfect storm' for observing'sparks' of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) We argue and empirically demonstrate that the finding of meaningful patterns in latent spaces of models cannot be seen as evidence in favor of AGI. We conclude that both the methodological setup and common public image of AI are ideal for the misinterpretation that correlations between model representations and some variables of interest are 'caused' by the model's understanding of underlying 'ground truth' relationships.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T12:42:21Z)
• Neural Causal Abstractions [63.21695740637627]
  We develop a new family of causal abstractions by clustering variables and their domains. We show that such abstractions are learnable in practical settings through Neural Causal Models. Our experiments support the theory and illustrate how to scale causal inferences to high-dimensional settings involving image data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-05T02:00:27Z)
• Causal Triplet: An Open Challenge for Intervention-centric Causal Representation Learning [98.78136504619539]
  Causal Triplet is a causal representation learning benchmark featuring visually more complex scenes. We show that models built with the knowledge of disentangled or object-centric representations significantly outperform their distributed counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-12T17:43:38Z)
• Systematic Evaluation of Causal Discovery in Visual Model Based Reinforcement Learning [76.00395335702572]
  A central goal for AI and causality is the joint discovery of abstract representations and causal structure. Existing environments for studying causal induction are poorly suited for this objective because they have complicated task-specific causal graphs. In this work, our goal is to facilitate research in learning representations of high-level variables as well as causal structures among them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-02T05:44:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.