Putting a Face to the Issue: Fostering User Empathy of Open Source Software Developers With PersonaFlow

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24478v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 13:45:24 GMT
• Title: Putting a Face to the Issue: Fostering User Empathy of Open Source Software Developers With PersonaFlow
• Abstract summary: Open-source software (OSS) developers often struggle to understand and respond to user context.<n>We present PersonaFlow, a tool that generates editable user personas from OSS repository artifacts and integrates them alongside issue reports.<n>In a user study with 13 OSS developers, most reported shifts in how they understood users, and more than half modified their responses by adding empathetic language.
• Score: 12.725103026964211
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Open-source software (OSS) developers often struggle to understand and respond to user context, while existing tools, such as issue trackers (for handling bugs, requests, and feedback), largely focus on technical discussion. Although personas could help, limited resources and UX expertise make them hard to scale. We present PersonaFlow, a tool that generates editable user personas from OSS repository artifacts and integrates them alongside issue reports. In a user study with 13 OSS developers, most reported shifts in how they understood users, and more than half modified their responses by adding empathetic language, tailoring explanations, or raising priority ratings. We found two pathways to this change: some connected emotionally to personas as people, while others used them pragmatically for triaging. Both appeared to lead to more user-centered behavior. We contribute design implications for persona-based tools relevant to OSS and other contexts where efficiency-driven systems or workflows obscure valuable human elements.

Related papers

• (Im)Paired Programming: Coding Agents Improve Productivity but Harm Understanding [59.19634073105828]
  We have 54 students create a website with one of two AI systems: an agent that edits user code.<n>We test understanding via comprehension questions and a task where users extend their code without agents.<n>Despite self-reported weaker understanding, users still prefer coding agents because they are quick and easy to use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-29T01:23:04Z)
• Beyond the Click: A Framework for Inferring Cognitive Traces in Search [2.50369129460887]
  We present a framework to infer cognitive traces from behavior logs.<n>These traces improve model performance on tasks like forecasting session outcomes and user struggle recovery.<n>This work provides the tools and data needed to build more human-like user simulators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T18:32:59Z)
• MLLM as a UI Judge: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs for Predicting Human Perception of User Interfaces [97.62557395494962]
  We use crowdsourcing to benchmark GPT-4o, Claude, and Llama across 30 interfaces.<n>Our results show that MLLMs approximate human preferences on some dimensions but diverge on others.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T20:00:41Z)
• User Feedback in Human-LLM Dialogues: A Lens to Understand Users But Noisy as a Learning Signal [59.120335322495436]
  We analyze user feedback in the user-LLM conversation logs, providing insights into when and why such feedback occurs.<n>Second, we study harvesting learning signals from such implicit user feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T23:33:29Z)
• Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer Workflows [60.04362496037186]
  We present the first controlled study of developer interactions with coding agents.<n>We evaluate two leading copilot and agentic coding assistants.<n>Our results show agents can assist developers in ways that surpass copilots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T20:12:54Z)
• Interactive Reasoning: Visualizing and Controlling Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models [54.85405423240165]
  We introduce Interactive Reasoning, an interaction design that visualizes chain-of-thought outputs as a hierarchy of topics.<n>We implement interactive reasoning in Hippo, a prototype for AI-assisted decision making in the face of uncertain trade-offs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T10:00:43Z)
• Creating General User Models from Computer Use [53.59999173952482]
  This paper presents an architecture for a general user model (GUM) that learns about you by observing any interaction you have with your computer.<n>The GUM takes as input any unstructured observation of a user (e.g., device screenshots) and constructs confidence-weighted propositions that capture user knowledge and preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T04:00:31Z)
• Untold Stories: Unveiling the Scarce Contributions of UX Professionals to Usability Issue Discussions of Open Source Software Projects [11.767394881100223]
  This study identifies UX professionals' distinct approaches to raising and following up on usability issues.<n>Compared to other contributors, UX professionals addressed a broader range of usability issues, well-supported their stances, and were more factual than emotional.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T15:45:13Z)
• On the Automated Processing of User Feedback [7.229732269884235]
  User feedback is an increasingly important source of information for requirements engineering, user interface design, and software engineering. To tap the full potential of feedback, there are two main challenges that need to be solved. Vendors must cope with a large quantity of feedback data, which is hard to manage manually. Second, vendors must also cope with a varying quality of feedback as some items might be uninformative, repetitive, or simply wrong.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T10:13:13Z)
• Characterising Developer Sentiment in Software Components: An Exploratory Study of Gentoo [6.253919624802852]
  Collaborative software development happens in teams, that cooperate on shared artefacts, and discuss development on online platforms. Previous research has shown how communication between team members, especially in an open-source environment, can become extremely toxic. Our study shows that, in recent years, negative emotions have generally decreased in the communication between Gentoo developers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T09:22:47Z)
• Extracting Self-Consistent Causal Insights from Users Feedback with LLMs and In-context Learning [11.609805521822878]
  Microsoft Windows Feedback Hub is designed to receive customer feedback on a wide variety of subjects including critical topics such as power and battery. To better understand and triage issues, we leverage Double Machine Learning (DML) to associate users' feedback with telemetry signals. Our approach is able to extract previously known issues, uncover new bugs, and identify sequences of events that lead to a bug.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T20:12:46Z)
• UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback [99.4633351133207]
  We present textscUltraFeedback, a large-scale, high-quality, and diversified AI feedback dataset. Our work validates the effectiveness of scaled AI feedback data in constructing strong open-source chat language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T17:40:01Z)
• A Neural Topical Expansion Framework for Unstructured Persona-oriented Dialogue Generation [52.743311026230714]
  Persona Exploration and Exploitation (PEE) is able to extend the predefined user persona description with semantically correlated content. PEE consists of two main modules: persona exploration and persona exploitation. Our approach outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in terms of both automatic and human evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-06T08:24:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.