Interactive Episodic Memory with User Feedback

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24893v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:19:58 GMT
• Title: Interactive Episodic Memory with User Feedback
• Abstract summary: We introduce the Episodic Memory with Questions and Feedback task (EM-QnF)<n>Here, the user can provide feedback on the model's initial prediction or add more information.<n>We propose a lightweight training scheme that avoids expensive sequential optimization.
• Score: 14.503449526387776
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In episodic memory with natural language queries (EM-NLQ), a user may ask a question (e.g., "Where did I place the mug?") that requires searching a long egocentric video, captured from the user's perspective, to find the moment that answers it. However, queries can be ambiguous or incomplete, leading to incorrect responses. Current methods ignore this key aspect and address EM-NLQ in a one-shot setup, limiting their applicability in real-world scenarios. In this work, we address this gap and introduce the Episodic Memory with Questions and Feedback task (EM-QnF). Here, the user can provide feedback on the model's initial prediction or add more information (e.g., "Before this. I'm looking for the big blue mug not the white one"), helping the model refine its predictions interactively. To this end, we collect datasets for feedback-based interaction and propose a lightweight training scheme that avoids expensive sequential optimization. We also introduce a plug-and-play Feedback ALignment Module (FALM) that enables existing EM-NLQ models to incorporate user feedback effectively. Our approach significantly improves over the state of the art on three challenging benchmarks and is better than or competitive with commercial large vision-language models while remaining efficient. Evaluation with human-generated feedback shows that it generalizes well to real-world scenarios.

Related papers

• Your Mouse and Eyes Secretly Leak Your Preference: LLM Alignment using Implicit Feedback from Users [25.631351524871636]
  Most existing methods collect explicit human feedback and train a reward model to predict the human preference based on the response text.<n>We build a new dataset called IFLLM, which collects 1336 multi-turn questions from the 59 Mechanical Turk workers.<n>Our reward model based on the implicit user feedback boosts the accuracy of the text-based reward model from 55% to 64% and nearly triples the relative response quality improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-18T17:00:48Z)
• Do LLMs Benefit From Their Own Words? [56.73014497206615]
  We find that removing prior assistant responses does not affect response quality on a large fraction of turns.<n>Omitting assistant-side context can reduce cumulative context lengths by up to 10x.<n>Our findings suggest that selectively omitting assistant history can improve response quality while reducing memory consumption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T18:58:26Z)
• Interactive Reasoning: Visualizing and Controlling Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models [54.85405423240165]
  We introduce Interactive Reasoning, an interaction design that visualizes chain-of-thought outputs as a hierarchy of topics.<n>We implement interactive reasoning in Hippo, a prototype for AI-assisted decision making in the face of uncertain trade-offs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T10:00:43Z)
• Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Critique Models with Test-Time and Training-Time Supervision [120.40788744292739]
  We propose a two-player paradigm that separates the roles of reasoning and critique models. We first propose AutoMathCritique, an automated and scalable framework for collecting critique data. We demonstrate that the critique models consistently improve the actor's performance on difficult queries at test-time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T17:11:54Z)
• RefuteBench: Evaluating Refuting Instruction-Following for Large Language Models [17.782410287625645]
  This paper proposes a benchmark, RefuteBench, covering tasks such as question answering, machine translation, and email writing. The evaluation aims to assess whether models can positively accept feedback in form of refuting instructions and whether they can consistently adhere to user demands throughout the conversation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T01:39:56Z)
• RLVF: Learning from Verbal Feedback without Overgeneralization [94.19501420241188]
  We study the problem of incorporating verbal feedback without such overgeneralization. We develop a new method Contextualized Critiques with Constrained Preference Optimization (C3PO) Our approach effectively applies verbal feedback to relevant scenarios while preserving existing behaviors for other contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T18:50:24Z)
• What if you said that differently?: How Explanation Formats Affect Human Feedback Efficacy and User Perception [53.4840989321394]
  We analyze the effect of rationales generated by QA models to support their answers. We present users with incorrect answers and corresponding rationales in various formats. We measure the effectiveness of this feedback in patching these rationales through in-context learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T04:26:32Z)
• UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback [99.4633351133207]
  We present textscUltraFeedback, a large-scale, high-quality, and diversified AI feedback dataset. Our work validates the effectiveness of scaled AI feedback data in constructing strong open-source chat language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T17:40:01Z)
• Towards Teachable Reasoning Systems [29.59387051046722]
  We develop a teachable reasoning system for question-answering (QA) Our approach is three-fold: First, generated chains of reasoning show how answers are implied by the system's own internal beliefs. Second, users can interact with the explanations to identify erroneous model beliefs and provide corrections. Third, we augment the model with a dynamic memory of such corrections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-27T17:15:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.