Dont Stop Early: Scalable Enterprise Deep Research with Controlled Information Flow and Evidence-Aware Termination

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24978v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 20:31:27 GMT
• Title: Dont Stop Early: Scalable Enterprise Deep Research with Controlled Information Flow and Evidence-Aware Termination
• Abstract summary: Enterprise deep research often fails to produce decision-ready reports due to uneven information coverage, context explosion, and premature stopping.<n>We propose a scalable Enterprise Deep Research architecture to address these failures.
• Score: 48.39579693613492
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Enterprise deep research often fails to produce decision-ready reports due to uneven information coverage, context explosion, and premature stopping. We propose a scalable Enterprise Deep Research (EDR) architecture to address these failures. Our system (i) decomposes requests into coverage-driven objectives via outline generation with reflection, (ii) localizes context with dependency-guided execution and explicit information sharing, and (iii) enforces evidence-based completion criteria so agents iteratively collect information until sufficiency conditions are met. We evaluate on an internal sales enablement task and the public DeepResearch Bench benchmark, where our proposed system design achieves the strongest overall performance compared with competitive deep-research baselines. The results show that dependency-controlled context and explicit evidence sufficiency criteria reduce premature stopping and improve the consistency and depth of enterprise research outputs.

Related papers

• Search-Time Contamination in Deep Research Agents: Measuring Performance Inflation in Public Benchmark Evaluation [17.913171310675306]
  We study Search-Time Contamination (STC) in deep research agent evaluation.<n>We find that STC is widespread and can inflate performance by up to 4%.<n>We advocate contamination-aware practices, including isolated sandboxes, transparent search trajectories, and controlled benchmark access.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T07:11:36Z)
• Marco DeepResearch: Unlocking Efficient Deep Research Agents via Verification-Centric Design [39.31356016375221]
  Marco DeepResearch is a deep research agent optimized with a verification-centric framework design at three levels.<n>We introduce verification mechanisms to graph-based and agent-based QA synthesis to control question difficulty.<n>We design a verification-driven synthesis trajectory method that injects explicit verification patterns into training trajectories.<n>We use Marco DeepResearch itself as a verifier at inference time and effectively improve performance on challenging questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-30T12:42:02Z)
• Total Recall QA: A Verifiable Evaluation Suite for Deep Research Agents [46.528475077428745]
  This paper identifies a list of requirements and optional properties for evaluating deep research agents.<n>We build TRQA, a deep research benchmark constructed from Wikidata-Wikipedia as a real-world source.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T05:58:46Z)
• AgentCPM-Report: Interleaving Drafting and Deepening for Open-Ended Deep Research [85.51475655916026]
  AgentCPM-Report is a lightweight yet high-performing local solution composed of a framework that mirrors the human writing process.<n>Our framework uses a Writing As Reasoning Policy (WARP), which enables models to dynamically revise outlines.<n>Experiments on DeepResearch Bench, DeepConsult, and DeepResearch Gym demonstrate that AgentCPM-Report outperforms leading closed-source systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-06T09:45:04Z)
• DeepSearchQA: Bridging the Comprehensiveness Gap for Deep Research Agents [10.197402632091551]
  DeepSearchQA is a 900-prompt benchmark for evaluating agents on difficult multi-step information-seeking tasks.<n>This dataset is designed to evaluate an agent's ability to execute complex search plans to generate exhaustive answer lists.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T19:20:47Z)
• Chaining the Evidence: Robust Reinforcement Learning for Deep Search Agents with Citation-Aware Rubric Rewards [60.0970117192627]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a critical technique for enhancing LLM-based deep search agents.<n>Existing approaches primarily rely on binary outcome rewards, which fail to capture the comprehensiveness and factuality of agents' reasoning process.<n>We propose textbfCitation-aware RL Rewards (CaRR), a fine-grained reward framework for deep search agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T18:57:53Z)
• DeepSynth-Eval: Objectively Evaluating Information Consolidation in Deep Survey Writing [53.85037373860246]
  We introduce Deep Synth-Eval, a benchmark designed to objectively evaluate information consolidation capabilities.<n>We propose a fine-grained evaluation protocol using General Checklists (for factual coverage) and Constraint Checklists (for structural organization)<n>Our results demonstrate that agentic plan-and-write significantly outperform single-turn generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T03:07:52Z)
• Benchmarking Deep Search over Heterogeneous Enterprise Data [73.55304268238474]
  We present a new benchmark for evaluating a form of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)<n>RAG requires source-aware, multi-hop reasoning over diverse, sparsed, but related sources.<n>We build it using a synthetic data pipeline that simulates business across product planning, development, and support stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T08:34:59Z)
• InfoDeepSeek: Benchmarking Agentic Information Seeking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [63.55258191625131]
  InfoDeepSeek is a new benchmark for assessing agentic information seeking in real-world, dynamic web environments.<n>We propose a systematic methodology for constructing challenging queries satisfying the criteria of determinacy, difficulty, and diversity.<n>We develop the first evaluation framework tailored to dynamic agentic information seeking, including fine-grained metrics about the accuracy, utility, and compactness of information seeking outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T14:44:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.