K-CARE: Knowledge-driven Symmetrical Contextual Anchoring and Analogical Prototype Reasoning for E-commerce Relevance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.25683v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:12:39 GMT
• Title: K-CARE: Knowledge-driven Symmetrical Contextual Anchoring and Analogical Prototype Reasoning for E-commerce Relevance
• Abstract summary: We propose K-CARE, a framework that extends the model's cognitive reach by grounding reasoning in external knowledge.<n>Extensive offline evaluations and online A/B tests on a leading e-commerce platform demonstrate that K-CARE significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper targets e-commerce search relevance. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in this field, they often encounter performance bottlenecks in persistent 'corner cases' within complex industrial scenarios. Existing research primarily focuses on optimizing reasoning trajectories via Reinforcement Learning. However, real-world observations suggest that the primary bottleneck stems from knowledge boundaries, where the absence of domain-specific intelligence in the model's parametric memory creates a contextual void. This void persists when interpreting idiosyncratic queries or niche products and cannot be resolved solely through reasoning-path optimization. To bridge this gap, we propose K-CARE, a framework that extends the model's cognitive reach by grounding reasoning in external knowledge. K-CARE comprises two synergistic components: (1) Symmetrical Contextual Anchoring (SCA), which fills the contextual void by anchoring queries and products with behavior-derived implicit knowledge; and (2) Analogical Prototype Reasoning (APR), which leverages expert-curated prototypical knowledge to calibrate decision boundaries through in-context analogy. Extensive offline evaluations and online A/B tests on a leading e-commerce platform demonstrate that K-CARE significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, delivering substantial commercial impact by resolving knowledge-intensive relevance challenges.

Related papers

• Agentic Adversarial QA for Improving Domain-Specific LLMs [53.00642389531106]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle to adapt effectively to specialized domains.<n>We propose an adversarial question-generation framework that produces a compact set of semantically challenging questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-20T10:53:09Z)
• REAL: Resolving Knowledge Conflicts in Knowledge-Intensive Visual Question Answering via Reasoning-Pivot Alignment [21.368211618743256]
  Knowledge-intensive Visual Question Answering (KI-VQA) frequently suffers from severe knowledge conflicts caused by the inherent limitations of open-domain retrieval.<n>We propose the REAL (Reasoning-Pivot Alignment) framework centered on the novel concept of the Reasoning-Pivot.<n>Our approach integrates Reasoning-Pivot Aware SFT (RPA-SFT) to train a generalizable discriminator by aligning conflicts with pivot extraction, and employs Reasoning-Pivot Guided Decoding (RPGD) for targeted conflict mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-15T09:29:53Z)
• Reason-IAD: Knowledge-Guided Dynamic Latent Reasoning for Explainable Industrial Anomaly Detection [85.29900916231655]
  Reason-IAD is a knowledge-guided dynamic latent reasoning framework for explainable industrial anomaly detection.<n>Experiments demonstrate that Reason-IAD consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T14:54:17Z)
• Thinking Broad, Acting Fast: Latent Reasoning Distillation from Multi-Perspective Chain-of-Thought for E-Commerce Relevance [13.92735028342748]
  We propose a novel framework that better exploits Chain-of-Thought (CoT) semantics throughout the optimization pipeline.<n>For distillation, we introduce Latent Reasoning Knowledge Distillation (LRKD), which endows a student model with a lightweight inference-time latent reasoning extractor.<n>Our method delivers significant offline gains, showing clear benefits in both commercial performance and user experience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T12:14:44Z)
• Towards Context-aware Reasoning-enhanced Generative Searching in E-commerce [61.03081096959132]
  We propose a context-aware reasoning-enhanced generative search framework for better textbfunderstanding the complicated context.<n>Our approach achieves superior performance compared with strong baselines, validating its effectiveness for search-based recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-19T16:46:11Z)
• KAG-Thinker: Interactive Thinking and Deep Reasoning in LLMs via Knowledge-Augmented Generation [35.555200530999365]
  We introduce KAG-Thinker, which upgrade KAG to a multi-turn interactive thinking and deep reasoning framework powered by a dedicated parameter-light large language model (LLM)<n>Our approach constructs a structured thinking process for solving complex problems, enhancing the the logical coherence and contextual consistency of the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-21T14:58:53Z)
• Two Experts Are All You Need for Steering Thinking: Reinforcing Cognitive Effort in MoE Reasoning Models Without Additional Training [86.70255651945602]
  We introduce a novel inference-time steering methodology called Reinforcing Cognitive Experts (RICE)<n>RICE aims to improve reasoning performance without additional training or complexs.<n> Empirical evaluations with leading MoE-based LRMs demonstrate noticeable and consistent improvements in reasoning accuracy, cognitive efficiency, and cross-domain generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T17:59:16Z)
• KERAIA: An Adaptive and Explainable Framework for Dynamic Knowledge Representation and Reasoning [46.85451489222176]
  KERAIA is a novel framework and software platform for symbolic knowledge engineering.<n>It addresses the persistent challenges of representing, reasoning with, and executing knowledge in dynamic, complex, and context-sensitive environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-07T10:56:05Z)
• A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems [93.8285345915925]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process that enables logical inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), reasoning has emerged as a key capability that distinguishes advanced AI systems.<n>We categorize existing methods along two dimensions: (1) Regimes, which define the stage at which reasoning is achieved; and (2) Architectures, which determine the components involved in the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T01:27:49Z)
• GIVE: Structured Reasoning of Large Language Models with Knowledge Graph Inspired Veracity Extrapolation [108.2008975785364]
  Graph Inspired Veracity Extrapolation (GIVE) is a novel reasoning method that merges parametric and non-parametric memories to improve accurate reasoning with minimal external input.<n>GIVE guides the LLM agent to select the most pertinent expert data (observe), engage in query-specific divergent thinking (reflect), and then synthesize this information to produce the final output (speak)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T03:05:06Z)
• MR-Ben: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating System-2 Thinking in LLMs [55.20845457594977]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing capability in problem-solving and decision-making.<n>We present a process-based benchmark MR-Ben that demands a meta-reasoning skill.<n>Our meta-reasoning paradigm is especially suited for system-2 slow thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T03:50:23Z)
• Robust Interaction-Based Relevance Modeling for Online e-Commerce Search [8.499253194630665]
  Traditional text-matching techniques fail to capture the nuances of search intent accurately. We introduce a robust interaction-based modeling paradigm to address these shortcomings. To the best of our knowledge, this method is the first interaction-based approach for large e-commerce search relevance calculation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T09:24:04Z)
• Learning a Structural Causal Model for Intuition Reasoning in Conversation [20.243323155177766]
  Reasoning, a crucial aspect of NLP research, has not been adequately addressed by prevailing models. We develop a conversation cognitive model ( CCM) that explains how each utterance receives and activates channels of information. By leveraging variational inference, it explores substitutes for implicit causes, addresses the issue of their unobservability, and reconstructs the causal representations of utterances through the evidence lower bounds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-28T13:54:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.