Beyond Project-Based Learning: Conference-Style Writing as Authentic Assessment in Interdisciplinary Quantum Engineering Education
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27110v1
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:03:12 GMT
- Title: Beyond Project-Based Learning: Conference-Style Writing as Authentic Assessment in Interdisciplinary Quantum Engineering Education
- Abstract summary: This paper examines the educational role of a conference-style paper requirement embedded within a project-based learning implementation.<n>We evaluate perceived effects on conceptual understanding, scientific communication, research readiness, and attitudes toward the writing requirement itself.<n>We argue that once has been established in quantum mechanics education, conference-style writing can serve as an extension of that model.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Project-based learning is recognized as an effective approach for improving engagement and applied understanding in STEM education. In quantum engineering courses, however, the question is no longer only whether students benefit from projects but how those projects should culminate if the goal is authentic disciplinary preparation. This paper examines the educational role of a conference-style paper requirement embedded within a project-based learning implementation for an introductory quantum mechanics course for engineers. We use post-course survey responses from students in a pilot run of the course. We evaluate perceived effects on conceptual understanding, scientific communication, research readiness, and attitudes toward the writing requirement itself. The results suggest that students viewed the project as beneficial for engagement, confidence, and technical skill development, while the conference-style paper emerged as a demanding but meaningful component of the experience. We argue that once PBL has been established in quantum mechanics education, conference-style writing can serve as an extension of that model, especially for graduate students. The findings support retaining the conference-paper requirement with improved scaffolding.
Related papers
- Interpretable Difficulty-Aware Knowledge Tracing in Tutor-Student Dialogues [46.915280360954576]
We propose an interpretable difficulty-aware conversational KT framework built upon large language models (LLMs)<n>The framework incorporates the original textual question and the next tutor-posed task to estimate the student's knowledge state and the difficulty of the upcoming turn.<n>We evaluate the framework on two tutor-student dialogue datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-01T21:07:24Z) - PaperMind: Benchmarking Agentic Reasoning and Critique over Scientific Papers in Multimodal LLMs [68.27437550335709]
We introduce PaperMind, a benchmark designed to evaluate integrated and agent-oriented scientific reasoning over research papers.<n>PaperMind is constructed from real scientific papers across seven domains, including agriculture, biology, chemistry, computer science, medicine, physics, and economics.<n>By analyzing model behavior across multiple tasks, PaperMind enables a diagnostic evaluation of integrated scientific reasoning behaviors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-23T05:42:39Z) - Beyond the Code: A Multi-Modal Assessment Strategy for Fostering Professional Competencies via Introductory Programming Projects [1.8810916321241071]
This paper reports on a "Fundamentals of Programming" course that used a Project-Based Learning framework to develop a 2D "Maze Runner"-style game.<n>Our findings suggest that this multi-dimensional approach improves student retention of programming fundamentals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-19T10:42:34Z) - Reward Modeling for Scientific Writing Evaluation [50.33952894976367]
It is critical to develop models that can be reliably deployed for evaluating diverse open-ended scientific writing tasks.<n>We propose cost-efficient, open-source reward models tailored for scientific writing evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-16T15:32:58Z) - Exposía: Academic Writing Assessment of Exposés and Peer Feedback [56.428320613219306]
We present Exposa, the first public dataset that connects writing and feedback assessment in higher education.<n>We use Exposa to benchmark state-of-the-art open-source large language models (LLMs) for two tasks: automated scoring of (1) the proposals and (2) the student reviews.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-10T11:33:26Z) - Project-Based Learning in Introductory Quantum Computing Courses: A Case Study on Quantum Algorithms for Medical Imaging [0.0]
This paper demonstrates how Project-Based Learning can be leveraged to bridge that gap.<n>This can be done by engaging students in a real-world, interdisciplinary task that combines quantum computing with their field of interest.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-29T04:24:26Z) - Effects of a Prompt Engineering Intervention on Undergraduate Students' AI Self-Efficacy, AI Knowledge and Prompt Engineering Ability: A Mixed Methods Study [36.48421439947282]
This study designed and implemented a prompt engineering intervention at a university in Hong Kong.
It examined students' AI self-efficacy, AI knowledge, and proficiency in creating effective prompts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-30T15:05:24Z) - Explainable Few-shot Knowledge Tracing [48.877979333221326]
We propose a cognition-guided framework that can track the student knowledge from a few student records while providing natural language explanations.
Experimental results from three widely used datasets show that LLMs can perform comparable or superior to competitive deep knowledge tracing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-23T10:07:21Z) - Hey, Teacher, (Don't) Leave Those Kids Alone: Standardizing HRI Education [0.0]
This paper outlines the key components necessary to provide an undergraduate with a sufficient foundational understanding of the interdisciplinary nature of this field.<n>It emphasizes the importance of creating a course with theoretical and experimental components to accommodate all different learning preferences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-20T18:01:20Z) - UKP-SQuARE: An Interactive Tool for Teaching Question Answering [61.93372227117229]
The exponential growth of question answering (QA) has made it an indispensable topic in any Natural Language Processing (NLP) course.
We introduce UKP-SQuARE as a platform for QA education.
Students can run, compare, and analyze various QA models from different perspectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-31T11:29:04Z) - Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model
Enhanced Approach [77.61131357420201]
We conduct a thorough and rigorous study on fairness disparities in peer review with the help of large language models (LMs)
We collect, assemble, and maintain a comprehensive relational database for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) conference from 2017 to date.
We postulate and study fairness disparities on multiple protective attributes of interest, including author gender, geography, author, and institutional prestige.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-07T16:19:42Z) - Framework for an Integrated Learning Block with CDIO-led Engineering
Education [0.2578242050187029]
The School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Sheridan maintains a curriculum that is deeply rooted in skills-based learning, experiential learning, and engineering design.
An important challenge still impeding our students knowledge acquisition is the perception that program courses have disjointed learning outcomes.
One feasible approach to tackle this pedagogical challenge is to combine various courses into an integrated learning block (ILB) having a unified mission and objective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-04T22:00:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.