Language Ideologies in a Multilingual Society: An LLM-based Analysis of Luxembourgish News Comments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27661v1
• Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:55:36 GMT
• Title: Language Ideologies in a Multilingual Society: An LLM-based Analysis of Luxembourgish News Comments
• Abstract summary: This paper explores the potential of large language models to assist in the detection of language ideologies.<n>We manually annotate a corpus of user comments in Luxembourgish with predefined ideological categories.<n>We also evaluate the performance of large language models under varying prompt conditions to assess their ability to replicate these human annotations.
• Score: 5.187863439550787
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Detecting language ideologies is a valuable yet complex task for understanding how identities are constructed through discourse. In Luxembourg's multicultural and multilingual society, language ideologies reflect more than simple preferences: they carry deep cultural and social meanings, shaping identities and social belonging. Following recent developments in applying Natural Language Processing tools to linguistics and social science, this paper explores the potential of large language models to assist in the detection of language ideologies. We manually annotate a corpus of user comments in Luxembourgish with predefined ideological categories and then evaluate the performance of large language models under varying prompt conditions to assess their ability to replicate these human annotations. Since Luxembourgish is a small language and poorly represented in the LLMs' training data, we also investigate whether machine-translating the data to high-resource languages increases performance on the ideology detection task. Our findings suggest that, while LLMs are not yet fully optimized for a multi-class ideological annotation task, they are practical tools to identify language ideological content.

Related papers

• Shaping Schema via Language Representation as the Next Frontier for LLM Intelligence Expanding [88.11781604392606]
  This paper defines language representation as the linguistic and symbolic constructs used to map and model the real world.<n>We argue that shaping schemas through advanced language representation is the next frontier for expanding Large Language Models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T02:42:29Z)
• The Language You Ask In: Language-Conditioned Ideological Divergence in LLM Analysis of Contested Political Documents [0.8528384027684192]
  This study presents an experimental comparison of large language models (LLMs) with prompts in Russian and Ukrainian.<n>Despite identical source material and parallel query structures, the resulting analyses varied substantially in rhetorical positioning, ideological orientation, and interpretive conclusions.<n>The Russian-language output echoed narratives common in Russian state discourse, characterizing civil society actors as illegitimate elites undermining democratic mandates.<n>The Ukrainian-language output adopted vocabulary characteristic of Western liberal-democratic political science, treating the same actors as legitimate stakeholders within democratic contestation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-17T21:00:36Z)
• On the Same Wavelength? Evaluating Pragmatic Reasoning in Language Models across Broad Concepts [69.69818198773244]
  We study a range of LMs on both language comprehension and language production.<n>We find that state-of-the-art LMs, but not smaller ones, achieve strong performance on language comprehension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T17:59:32Z)
• XToM: Exploring the Multilingual Theory of Mind for Large Language Models [57.9821865189077]
  Existing evaluations of Theory of Mind in LLMs are largely limited to English.<n>We present XToM, a rigorously validated multilingual benchmark that evaluates ToM across five languages.<n>Our findings expose limitations in LLMs' ability to replicate human-like mentalizing across linguistic contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T05:23:25Z)
• When Less Language is More: Language-Reasoning Disentanglement Makes LLMs Better Multilingual Reasoners [111.50503126693444]
  We show that language-specific ablation consistently boosts multilingual reasoning performance.<n>Compared to post-training, our training-free ablation achieves comparable or superior results with minimal computational overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T08:35:05Z)
• LinguaLens: Towards Interpreting Linguistic Mechanisms of Large Language Models via Sparse Auto-Encoder [47.81850176849213]
  We propose a framework for analyzing the linguistic mechanisms of large language models, based on Sparse Auto-Encoders (SAEs)<n>We extract a broad set of Chinese and English linguistic features across four dimensions (morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics)<n>Our findings reveal intrinsic representations of linguistic knowledge in LLMs, uncover patterns of cross-layer and cross-lingual distribution, and demonstrate the potential to control model outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T18:16:47Z)
• How does a Multilingual LM Handle Multiple Languages? [0.0]
  This study critically examines capabilities in multilingual understanding, semantic representation, and cross-lingual knowledge transfer.<n>It assesses semantic similarity by analyzing multilingual word embeddings for consistency using cosine similarity.<n>It examines BLOOM-1.7B and Qwen2 through Named Entity Recognition and sentence similarity tasks to understand their linguistic structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T18:08:14Z)
• Standard Language Ideology in AI-Generated Language [1.2815904071470705]
  Standard language ideology is reflected and reinforced in language generated by large language models (LLMs)<n>We present a faceted taxonomy of open problems that illustrate how standard language ideology manifests in AI-generated language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T01:08:40Z)
• Measurement in the Age of LLMs: An Application to Ideological Scaling [1.9413548770753526]
  This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) to navigate the conceptual clutter inherent to social scientific measurement tasks. We rely on LLMs' remarkable linguistic fluency to elicit ideological scales of both legislators and text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-14T18:34:06Z)
• Dissociating language and thought in large language models [52.39241645471213]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have come closest among all models to date to mastering human language. We ground this distinction in human neuroscience, which has shown that formal and functional competence rely on different neural mechanisms. Although LLMs are surprisingly good at formal competence, their performance on functional competence tasks remains spotty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-16T22:41:19Z)
• Multilingual Word Sense Disambiguation with Unified Sense Representation [55.3061179361177]
  We propose building knowledge and supervised-based Multilingual Word Sense Disambiguation (MWSD) systems. We build unified sense representations for multiple languages and address the annotation scarcity problem for MWSD by transferring annotations from rich-sourced languages to poorer ones. Evaluations of SemEval-13 and SemEval-15 datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our methodology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T01:24:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.