Normativity and Productivism: Ableist Intelligence? A Degrowth Analysis of AI Sign Language Translation Tools for Deaf People

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.28125v1
• Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:14:08 GMT
• Title: Normativity and Productivism: Ableist Intelligence? A Degrowth Analysis of AI Sign Language Translation Tools for Deaf People
• Abstract summary: This paper argues for the idea of AI as Ableist Intelligence, as such systems seek to emphasise the humiliated and marginalised nature of sign.<n>This phenomenon is best analysed under the scope of The Technological System and Technological bluff by Ellul.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Sign languages, of any geographical or accentual variation, understandably face continuous scrutiny under the ever present popularity of verbal dictation and audism. Through this, many potential problems arise with the current lack of accessible communication for those who rely on such sign languages for essential conversation. Such AI systems regularly take the form of recognition and interpretation models, designed to provide seamless and accurate translation. In reality these systems are built from biased data and created without any input from deaf communities. Such models are widely used and accepted by their hearing counterparts who remain ignorant to the inherent culture, semantics and colloquial language present in gestural language systems. This phenomenon is best analysed under the scope of The Technological System and Technological bluff by Ellul. Indeed, what is at play here is the standardization of language by technicians into what can be captured by technique: data, statistics, a mathematical language. For that AI technique to exist, sign language must be rationalized, in a search for profit that annihilates the conditions for communication and fails to capture the human experience of the deaf person. By that process, it presents normative effects, creating a model of Man, standardized, massified, and who has to adapt to the tool and technical milieu instead of the other way around, which we assume should have been the goal of such a technology. Technique thus reshapes what it means to be human, to submit deaf people to the goals of productivity and efficiency. In doing so, it exhibits clear counter productivity, alienating instead of emancipating, isolating instead of nourishing human relationships. Therefore this paper argues for the idea of AI as Ableist Intelligence, as such systems seek to emphasise the humiliated and marginalised nature of sign.

Related papers

• Towards Inclusive Communication: A Unified Framework for Generating Spoken Language from Sign, Lip, and Audio [52.859261069569165]
  We propose the first unified framework capable of handling diverse combinations of sign language, lip movements, and audio for spoken-language text generation.<n>We focus on three main objectives: (i) designing a unified, modality-agnostic architecture capable of effectively processing heterogeneous inputs; (ii) exploring the underexamined synergy among modalities, particularly the role of lip movements as non-manual cues in sign language comprehension; and (iii) achieving performance on par with or better than state-of-the-art models specialized for individual tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T06:51:42Z)
• Deaf in AI: AI language technologies and the erosion of linguistic rights [0.0]
  This paper explores the interplay of AI language technologies, sign language interpreting, and linguistic access.<n>It calls for deaf-led approaches to foster AI systems that remain equitable, inclusive, and trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-05T09:58:59Z)
• Machines of Meaning [0.0]
  We discuss the challenges in the specification of "machines of meaning"<n>We highlight the need for detachment from anthropocentrism in the study of machines of meaning.<n>We propose a view of "meaning" to facilitate the discourse around approaches such as neural language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T23:23:28Z)
• Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic Systems [67.01132165581667]
  We propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components. We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T21:20:17Z)
• A Comparative Analysis of Techniques and Algorithms for Recognising Sign Language [0.9311364633437358]
  Sign language is frequently used as the primary form of communication by people with hearing loss. It is necessary to create human-computer interface systems that can offer hearing-impaired people a social platform. Most commercial sign language translation systems are sensor-based, pricey, and challenging to use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-05T10:52:18Z)
• "No, to the Right" -- Online Language Corrections for Robotic Manipulation via Shared Autonomy [70.45420918526926]
  We present LILAC, a framework for incorporating and adapting to natural language corrections online during execution. Instead of discrete turn-taking between a human and robot, LILAC splits agency between the human and robot. We show that our corrections-aware approach obtains higher task completion rates, and is subjectively preferred by users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-06T15:03:27Z)
• What Artificial Neural Networks Can Tell Us About Human Language Acquisition [47.761188531404066]
  Rapid progress in machine learning for natural language processing has the potential to transform debates about how humans learn language. To increase the relevance of learnability results from computational models, we need to train model learners without significant advantages over humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-17T00:12:37Z)
• Human Heuristics for AI-Generated Language Are Flawed [8.465228064780744]
  We study whether verbal self-presentations, one of the most personal and consequential forms of language, were generated by AI. We experimentally demonstrate that these wordings make human judgment of AI-generated language predictable and manipulable. We discuss solutions, such as AI accents, to reduce the deceptive potential of language generated by AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-15T03:18:56Z)
• Emergence of Machine Language: Towards Symbolic Intelligence with Neural Networks [73.94290462239061]
  We propose to combine symbolism and connectionism principles by using neural networks to derive a discrete representation. By designing an interactive environment and task, we demonstrated that machines could generate a spontaneous, flexible, and semantic language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-14T14:54:58Z)
• Building Human-like Communicative Intelligence: A Grounded Perspective [1.0152838128195465]
  After making astounding progress in language learning, AI systems seem to approach the ceiling that does not reflect important aspects of human communicative capacities. This paper suggests that the dominant cognitively-inspired AI directions, based on nativist and symbolic paradigms, lack necessary substantiation and concreteness to guide progress in modern AI. I propose a list of concrete, implementable components for building "grounded" linguistic intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-02T01:43:24Z)
• Machine Common Sense [77.34726150561087]
  Machine common sense remains a broad, potentially unbounded problem in artificial intelligence (AI) This article deals with the aspects of modeling commonsense reasoning focusing on such domain as interpersonal interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T13:59:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.