Are Tools All We Need? Unveiling the Tool-Use Tax in LLM Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00136v1
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 18:46:01 GMT
- Title: Are Tools All We Need? Unveiling the Tool-Use Tax in LLM Agents
- Abstract summary: We show that in the presence of semantic distractors, tool-augmented reasoning does not necessarily outperform native CoT.<n>Our analysis reveals a critical tradeoff: under semantic noise, the gains from tools often fail to offset the "tool-use tax"<n>We introduce G-STEP, a lightweight inference-time gate to mitigate protocol-induced errors.
- Score: 16.379755833783406
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Tool-augmented reasoning has become a popular direction for LLM-based agents, and it is widely assumed to improve reasoning and reliability. However, we demonstrate that this consensus does not always hold: in the presence of semantic distractors, tool-augmented reasoning does not necessarily outperform native CoT. To explain this performance gap, we propose a Factorized Intervention Framework that isolates the cost of prompt formatting, the overhead of the tool-calling protocol, and the actual gain from executing tools. Our analysis reveals a critical tradeoff: under semantic noise, the gains from tools often fail to offset the "tool-use tax", which is the performance degradation introduced by the tool-calling protocol itself. To address this, we introduce G-STEP, a lightweight inference-time gate to mitigate protocol-induced errors. While this yields partial recovery, our findings suggest that more substantial improvements still require strengthening the model's intrinsic reasoning and tool-interaction capabilities.
Related papers
- Spurious Tool Use: When RL Agents Learn the Wrong Reason to Act [38.40533345940731]
Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly interleave natural language reasoning with external tools.<n>We study when and why RL-trained agents learn shortcut tool-selection policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-14T19:31:04Z) - TAPO: Tool-Aware Policy Optimization via Credit Transfer for Multimodal Search Agents [54.08846865906602]
We characterize credit misassignment as a systematic failure mode of GRPO in tool-augmented multimodal search agents.<n>We propose Tool-Aware Policy Optimization (TAPO), which exploits the parameter-determinism property of information-acquisition tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-04T07:15:43Z) - Do LLMs Know Tool Irrelevance? Demystifying Structural Alignment Bias in Tool Invocations [32.820855447313825]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in utilizing external tools.<n>LLMs are often exposed to tools that are irrelevant to the user's query.<n>Even when a tool fails to serve the user's goal, LLMs still tend to invoke it whenever query attributes can be validly assigned to tool parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-13T11:23:36Z) - Act Wisely: Cultivating Meta-Cognitive Tool Use in Agentic Multimodal Models [27.250148827297604]
HDPO is a framework that reframes tool efficiency from a competing scalar objective to a strictly conditional one.<n>Our resulting model, Metis, reduces tool invocations by orders of magnitude while simultaneously elevating reasoning accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-09T17:59:57Z) - When to Trust Tools? Adaptive Tool Trust Calibration For Tool-Integrated Math Reasoning [58.75883713573783]
Tool-Integrated Reasoning has emerged as a promising paradigm that incorporates tool call and execution within the reasoning trajectory.<n>We find that when the reasoning of the model conflicts with the tool results, the model tends to believe in its own reasoning.<n>We introduce Adaptive Tool Trust (ATTC), a framework that guides the model to adaptively choose to trust or ignore the tool results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-09T14:14:37Z) - ForgeryVCR: Visual-Centric Reasoning via Efficient Forensic Tools in MLLMs for Image Forgery Detection and Localization [62.03035862528452]
ForgeryVCR is a framework that materializes imperceptible traces into explicit visual intermediates via Visual-Centric Reasoning.<n>ForgeryVCR achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance in both detection and localization tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-15T11:14:47Z) - Improving Large Language Models Function Calling and Interpretability via Guided-Structured Templates [56.73907811047611]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning and tool-use capabilities.<n>LLMs often fail in real-world tool-interactions due to incorrect parameterization, poor tool selection, or misinterpretation of user intent.<n>We introduce a curriculum-inspired framework that leverages structured reasoning templates to guide LLMs through more deliberate step-by-step instructions for generating function callings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-22T17:55:14Z) - Acting Less is Reasoning More! Teaching Model to Act Efficiently [87.28134636548705]
Tool-integrated reasoning augments large language models with the ability to invoke external tools to solve tasks.<n>Current approaches typically optimize only for final correctness without considering the efficiency or necessity of external tool use.<n>We propose a framework that encourages models to produce accurate answers with minimal tool calls.<n>Our approach reduces tool calls by up to 68.3% and improves tool productivity by up to 215.4%, while maintaining comparable answer accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-21T05:40:05Z) - Adaptive Tool Use in Large Language Models with Meta-Cognition Trigger [49.81945268343162]
We propose MeCo, an adaptive decision-making strategy for external tool use.<n>MeCo quantifies metacognitive scores by capturing high-level cognitive signals in the representation space.<n>MeCo is fine-tuning-free and incurs minimal cost.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T15:45:01Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.