LambdaRankIC: Directly Optimizing Rank IC for Financial Prediction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00501v1
• Date: Fri, 01 May 2026 08:24:59 GMT
• Title: LambdaRankIC: Directly Optimizing Rank IC for Financial Prediction
• Abstract summary: In financial predictions, the performance of machine learning models is often assessed by Rank IC.<n>We propose LambdaRankIC, a novel learning-to-rank approach that directly optimize Rank IC.<n>We evaluate the proposed approach on both simulated and real-world financial data.
• Score: 8.50639201265868
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In financial predictions, the performance of machine learning models is often assessed by Rank IC, which is the Spearman rank correlation between the model predictions and the realized asset returns. Despite its wide adoption, most existing models are trained using regression losses or ranking objectives that may not align with Rank IC. We propose LambdaRankIC, a novel learning-to-rank approach that directly optimizes Rank IC. We circumvent the non-differentiability of the ranking operator by deriving the closed-form expression for the lambda gradients induced by the pairwise rank swaps, which enables efficient gradient-based optimization within the LambdaRank framework. We implement LambdaRankIC as a custom objective in XGBoost. Theoretically, we show that our approach optimizes an upper bound on Rank IC. We evaluate the proposed approach on both simulated and real-world financial data. In simulation studies, LambdaRankIC accurately recovers the true ranking structure in noiseless settings and consistently outperforms regression-based and NDCG-oriented ranking methods under low signal-to-noise ratios and heavy-tailed noise regimes. In empirical experiments using real market data, LambdaRankIC achieves the best out-of-sample performance on evaluation metrics commonly used in finance, including Rank IC, ICIR, monthly return, and Sharpe ratio. These results show that directly optimizing Rank IC can yield substantial improvements over conventional learning objectives in financial predictions when the full-order ranking quality is the primary goal.

Related papers

• Structure-aware Relative Policy Optimization for Ranking [35.05747484313467]
  We propose SRPO, a textbfStructure-aware textbfRelative textbfPolicy textbfOptimization framework for listwise ranking.<n>It measures the discrepancy between sampled permutations using a top-weighted Kendall-tau distance and normalizes their pairwise reward differences by the corresponding distances.<n> Experimental results across two ranking scenarios demonstrate that explicitly modeling permutation-level differences improves the effectiveness and stability of listwise ranking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-28T04:13:47Z)
• Beyond Static Best-of-N: Bayesian List-wise Alignment for LLM-based Recommendation [23.95623437107717]
  Large Language Models have revolutionized recommender systems (LLM4Rec) by leveraging their generative capabilities to model user preferences.<n>Existing LLM4Rec methods rely on token-level objectives, making it difficult to optimize list-level and non-differentiable metrics that define actual recommendation quality.<n>We propose BLADE (Bayesian List-wise Alignment via Dynamic Estimation) to overcome these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-06T07:02:57Z)
• Metric-agnostic Learning-to-Rank via Boosting and Rank Approximation [33.0347118359824]
  We propose a new differentiable ranking loss that combines a smooth approximation to the ranking operator with the average mean square loss per query.<n>Our method outperforms the current state-of-the-art in information retrieval measures with similar efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-16T14:59:00Z)
• Provable and Practical In-Context Policy Optimization for Self-Improvement [49.670847804409874]
  We study test-time scaling, where a model improves its answer through multi-round self-reflection at inference.<n>We introduce In-Context Policy Optimization (ICPO), in which an agent optimize its response in context using self-assessed or externally observed rewards without modifying its parameters.<n>We propose Minimum-Entropy ICPO (ME-ICPO), a practical algorithm that iteratively uses its response and self-assessed reward to refine its response in-context at inference time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T00:21:50Z)
• RewardRank: Optimizing True Learning-to-Rank Utility [28.662272762911325]
  We introduce RewardRank, a data-driven learning-to-rank framework for counterfactual utility.<n>Our results show that learning-to-rank can be reformulated as direct optimization of counterfactual utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-19T18:08:35Z)
• NDCG-Consistent Softmax Approximation with Accelerated Convergence [67.10365329542365]
  We propose novel loss formulations that align directly with ranking metrics.<n>We integrate the proposed RG losses with the highly efficient Alternating Least Squares (ALS) optimization method.<n> Empirical evaluations on real-world datasets demonstrate that our approach achieves comparable or superior ranking performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T06:59:17Z)
• In-context Ranking Preference Optimization [65.5489745857577]
  We propose an In-context Ranking Preference Optimization (IRPO) framework to optimize large language models (LLMs) based on ranking lists constructed during inference.<n>We show IRPO outperforms standard DPO approaches in ranking performance, highlighting its effectiveness in aligning LLMs with direct in-context ranking preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T23:06:12Z)
• RaCT: Ranking-aware Chain-of-Thought Optimization for LLMs [30.216174551427443]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in text reranking tasks.<n> conventional supervised fine-tuning approaches for specializing LLMs in ranking tasks often lead to significant degradation of the models' general-purpose abilities.<n>This paper presents a novel methodology that strategically combines Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting techniques with an innovative two-stage training pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T23:24:15Z)
• Preference Learning Algorithms Do Not Learn Preference Rankings [62.335733662381884]
  We study the conventional wisdom that preference learning trains models to assign higher likelihoods to more preferred outputs than less preferred outputs. We find that most state-of-the-art preference-tuned models achieve a ranking accuracy of less than 60% on common preference datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T21:29:44Z)
• Lower-Left Partial AUC: An Effective and Efficient Optimization Metric for Recommendation [52.45394284415614]
  We propose a new optimization metric, Lower-Left Partial AUC (LLPAUC), which is computationally efficient like AUC but strongly correlates with Top-K ranking metrics. LLPAUC considers only the partial area under the ROC curve in the Lower-Left corner to push the optimization focus on Top-K.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T13:58:33Z)
• Learning Fair Ranking Policies via Differentiable Optimization of Ordered Weighted Averages [55.04219793298687]
  This paper shows how efficiently-solvable fair ranking models can be integrated into the training loop of Learning to Rank. In particular, this paper is the first to show how to backpropagate through constrained optimizations of OWA objectives, enabling their use in integrated prediction and decision models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T20:53:53Z)
• Adaptive Neural Ranking Framework: Toward Maximized Business Goal for Cascade Ranking Systems [33.46891569350896]
  Cascade ranking is widely used for large-scale top-k selection problems in online advertising and recommendation systems. Previous works on learning-to-rank usually focus on letting the model learn the complete order or top-k order. We name this method as Adaptive Neural Ranking Framework (abbreviated as ARF)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T14:43:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.