What's on Your Mind? Exploring Privacy of Mental Health Apps

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02016v2
• Date: Sun, 10 May 2026 19:30:35 GMT
• Title: What's on Your Mind? Exploring Privacy of Mental Health Apps
• Abstract summary: We present a comprehensive analysis of 25 popular Android mental health and life-coaching apps.<n>Every app embeds at least one tracker SDK that its privacy policy does not name.<n> 68% of apps fail to disclose at least half of the trackers detected in their APKs.
• Score: 19.866264316153547
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Therapy and life-coaching apps have been rapidly growing in number, flavors, and popularity. However, their users routinely share highly sensitive and personal information, such as traumas, fantasies, desires, relationship difficulties, and other mental health concerns. This prompts the need for an empirical analysis of privacy practices in this ecosystem, and particularly the alignment between these apps' privacy policies and their actual behavior. In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis of 25 popular Android mental health and life-coaching apps, combining static analysis, dynamic network capture, and LLM-assisted privacy policy extraction validated against manual annotation. Our findings highlight serious concerns and substantial transparency gaps. First, every app embeds at least one tracker SDK that its privacy policy does not name, and 68% of apps fail to disclose at least half of the trackers detected in their APKs; Talkie alone embeds 20 while naming none. Second, we identify 16 permission-policy contradictions across 13 apps, i.e., a dangerous permission is declared in the manifest but omitted from the policy, including 6 apps that request camera or microphone access without disclosing photo, video, or audio collection. Third, 48% of apps disclose third-party AI processing (e.g., via OpenAI, Anthropic, Groq), with one app sending journal entries to all three simultaneously, while 7 apps use only generic language that leaves recipients unidentified. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that current disclosure practices fall short of the transparency required for meaningful informed consent. We argue for a significantly updated regulatory framework governing therapy apps in the spirit of the professional and ethical standards that bind licensed human therapists.

Related papers

• Expecting (Targeted Ads)? Network Analysis of User Health Data Leakage in Fertility Tracking Apps [9.426024604008406]
  We conduct a network-based measurement study of a corpus of 20 Android fertility tracking apps from the Google Play Store.<n>We identify explicit leakage of user health data as well implicit leakage through highly targeted contextual advertising URL's.<n>These findings provide technical grounding for widespread user concerns, but also underscore the importance of consumer choice in the privacy implications of app-based fertility tracking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-24T18:17:04Z)
• Do Phone-Use Agents Respect Your Privacy? [97.81424230136075]
  We introduce MyPhoneBench, a verifiable evaluation framework for privacy behavior in mobile agents.<n>We operationalize privacy-respecting phone use as permissioned access, minimal disclosure, and user-controlled memory through a minimal privacy contract.<n>Across five frontier models on 10 mobile apps and 300 tasks, we find that task success, privacy-compliant task completion, and later-session use of saved preferences are distinct capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-01T14:50:50Z)
• Towards Precise Detection of Personal Information Leaks in Mobile Health Apps [1.5293427903448022]
  Mobile apps ask the user for, and then collect and leak a wealth of Personal Information (PI) We analyze the PI that apps collect via their user interface, whether the app or third-party code is processing this information, and finally where the data is sent or stored. We conducted a study on 1,243 Android apps: 623 medical apps and 621 health&fitness apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T23:15:05Z)
• PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Action [54.11479432110771]
  PrivacyLens is a novel framework designed to extend privacy-sensitive seeds into expressive vignettes and further into agent trajectories.<n>We instantiate PrivacyLens with a collection of privacy norms grounded in privacy literature and crowdsourced seeds.<n>State-of-the-art LMs, like GPT-4 and Llama-3-70B, leak sensitive information in 25.68% and 38.69% of cases, even when prompted with privacy-enhancing instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T17:58:38Z)
• ATLAS: Automatically Detecting Discrepancies Between Privacy Policies and Privacy Labels [2.457872341625575]
  We introduce the Automated Privacy Label Analysis System (ATLAS) ATLAS identifies possible discrepancies between mobile app privacy policies and their privacy labels. We find that, on average, apps have 5.32 such potential compliance issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T05:27:22Z)
• Mobile Mental Health Apps: Alternative Intervention or Intrusion? [2.131521514043068]
  Mobile Mental Health (MMH) apps emerge as an effective alternative to assist with a broad range of psychological disorders. The absence of a transparent privacy policy and lack of user awareness may pose a significant threat to undermining the applicability of such tools. Our results indicate that apps' exploitable flaws, dangerous permissions, and insecure data handling pose a potential threat to the users' privacy and security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-21T21:05:54Z)
• SPAct: Self-supervised Privacy Preservation for Action Recognition [73.79886509500409]
  Existing approaches for mitigating privacy leakage in action recognition require privacy labels along with the action labels from the video dataset. Recent developments of self-supervised learning (SSL) have unleashed the untapped potential of the unlabeled data. We present a novel training framework which removes privacy information from input video in a self-supervised manner without requiring privacy labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-29T02:56:40Z)
• Analysis of Longitudinal Changes in Privacy Behavior of Android Applications [79.71330613821037]
  In this paper, we examine the trends in how Android apps have changed over time with respect to privacy. We examine the adoption of HTTPS, whether apps scan the device for other installed apps, the use of permissions for privacy-sensitive data, and the use of unique identifiers. We find that privacy-related behavior has improved with time as apps continue to receive updates, and that the third-party libraries used by apps are responsible for more issues with privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-28T16:21:31Z)
• A Fait Accompli? An Empirical Study into the Absence of Consent to Third-Party Tracking in Android Apps [27.58278290929534]
  Third-party tracking allows companies to collect users' behavioural data and track their activity across digital devices. This can put deep insights into users' private lives into the hands of strangers, and often happens without users' awareness or explicit consent. This paper investigates whether and to what extent consent is implemented in mobile apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-17T11:44:49Z)
• Emerging App Issue Identification via Online Joint Sentiment-Topic Tracing [66.57888248681303]
  We propose a novel emerging issue detection approach named MERIT. Based on the AOBST model, we infer the topics negatively reflected in user reviews for one app version. Experiments on popular apps from Google Play and Apple's App Store demonstrate the effectiveness of MERIT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-23T06:34:05Z)
• Mind the GAP: Security & Privacy Risks of Contact Tracing Apps [75.7995398006171]
  Google and Apple have jointly provided an API for exposure notification in order to implement decentralized contract tracing apps using Bluetooth Low Energy. We demonstrate that in real-world scenarios the GAP design is vulnerable to (i) profiling and possibly de-anonymizing persons, and (ii) relay-based wormhole attacks that basically can generate fake contacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T16:05:05Z)
• How good is good enough for COVID19 apps? The influence of benefits, accuracy, and privacy on willingness to adopt [24.202334512830255]
  A growing number of contact tracing apps are being developed to complement manual contact tracing. We evaluate the effect of both accuracy and privacy concerns on reported willingness to install COVID19 contact tracing apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-09T01:53:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.