ANO: A Principled Approach to Robust Policy Optimization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02320v2
- Date: Wed, 06 May 2026 13:24:45 GMT
- Title: ANO: A Principled Approach to Robust Policy Optimization
- Abstract summary: We introduce a principled design space for policy optimization, demonstrating that a robust estimator must inherently suppress outliers.<n>We derive Anchored Neighborhood Optimization (ANO), a novel method that seamlessly replaces hard clipping with a redescending gradient mechanism.<n>In continuous (MuJoCo) and discrete (Atari) control, ANO establishes a robust state-of-the-art, uniquely preventing policy collapse even under highly aggressive learning rates.
- Score: 19.004647288017814
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) dominates reinforcement learning and LLM alignment but relies on a "hard clipping" mechanism that discards valuable gradients. Conversely, unconstrained methods like SPO expose the optimization to unbounded updates, causing severe instability and policy collapse during extreme outlier encounters. To resolve this dilemma, we introduce a principled design space for policy optimization, demonstrating that a robust estimator must inherently suppress outliers while maintaining a smooth restoration force. Guided by these geometric principles, we derive Anchored Neighborhood Optimization (ANO), a novel method that seamlessly replaces hard clipping with a redescending gradient mechanism. Extensive evaluations demonstrate ANO's empirical superiority across diverse domains. In continuous (MuJoCo) and discrete (Atari) control, ANO establishes a robust state-of-the-art, uniquely preventing policy collapse even under highly aggressive learning rates ($1 \times 10^{-3}$). Furthermore, in LLM alignment (RLHF), ANO explicitly eliminates the catastrophic KL divergence explosion inherent to unconstrained methods, dominating PPO, SPO, and GRPO in head-to-head win rates.
Related papers
- Ratio-Variance Regularized Policy Optimization [64.95520246570446]
We show that explicitly constraining the policy ratio variance provides a principled local approximation to trust-region constraints.<n>We introduce $bf R2bf VPO$ (Ratio-Variance Regularized Policy Optimization), which implements this constraint via a primal-dual optimization framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-26T09:53:42Z) - One-Way Policy Optimization for Self-Evolving LLMs [63.8638342097375]
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become a promising paradigm for scaling reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose One-Way Policy Optimization (OWPO), a method based on the principle of decoupling optimization direction from update magnitude.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that OWPO outperforms strong baselines, including DAPO, OPD, and MOPD.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-21T08:25:27Z) - Hindsight-Anchored Policy Optimization: Turning Failure into Feedback in Sparse Reward Settings [7.554296968064274]
We present Hindsight-Anchored Policy optimization (HAPO) for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR)<n>HAPO employs a hindsight mechanism that selectively anchors optimization to teacher demonstrations during failure.<n>We show that HAPO achieves textitasymptotic consistency: by naturally annealing the teacher signal as the policy improves, HAPO recovers the unbiased on-policy gradient.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-11T21:33:41Z) - Breaking the Curse of Repulsion: Optimistic Distributionally Robust Policy Optimization for Off-Policy Generative Recommendation [8.112649652437705]
We argue that the solution lies in rigorously identifying the latent high-quality distribution entangled within a noisy behavior policy.<n>We prove that hard filtering is the exact solution to this DRO objective, enabling DRPO to optimally recover high-quality behaviors while strictly discarding divergence-inducing noise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-11T02:18:27Z) - Rethinking the Trust Region in LLM Reinforcement Learning [72.25890308541334]
Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) serves as the de facto standard algorithm for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose Divergence Proximal Policy Optimization (DPPO), which substitutes clipping with a more principled constraint.<n>DPPO achieves superior training and efficiency compared to existing methods, offering a more robust foundation for RL-based fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-04T18:59:04Z) - Not All Preferences Are Created Equal: Stability-Aware and Gradient-Efficient Alignment for Reasoning Models [52.48582333951919]
We propose a dynamic framework designed to enhance alignment reliability by maximizing the Signal-to-Noise Ratio of policy updates.<n>SAGE (Stability-Aware Gradient Efficiency) integrates a coarse-grained curriculum mechanism that refreshes candidate pools based on model competence.<n> Experiments on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that SAGE significantly accelerates convergence and outperforms static baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-01T12:56:10Z) - A Step Back: Prefix Importance Ratio Stabilizes Policy Optimization [58.116300485427764]
Reinforcement learning post-training can elicit reasoning behaviors in large language models.<n> token-level correction often leads to unstable training dynamics when the degree of off-policyness is large.<n>We propose a simple yet effective objective, Minimum Prefix Ratio (MinPRO)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T08:47:19Z) - Ratio-Variance Regularized Policy Optimization for Efficient LLM Fine-tuning [48.34492357368989]
We propose a primal-dual framework that supports stable on-policy learning and enables principled off-policy data reuse.<n>$R2VPO$ achieves superior performance with average relative gains of up to 17% over strong clipping-based baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-06T14:01:42Z) - BAPO: Stabilizing Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning for LLMs via Balanced Policy Optimization with Adaptive Clipping [69.74252624161652]
We propose BAlanced Policy Optimization with Adaptive Clipping (BAPO)<n>BAPO dynamically adjusts clipping bounds to adaptively re-balance positive and negative contributions, preserve entropy, and stabilize RL optimization.<n>On AIME 2024 and AIME 2025 benchmarks, our 7B BAPO model surpasses open-source counterparts such as SkyWork-OR1-7B.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-21T12:55:04Z) - ADARL: Adaptive Low-Rank Structures for Robust Policy Learning under Uncertainty [28.291179179647795]
We propose textbfAdaptive Rank Representation (AdaRL), a bi-level optimization framework that improves robustness.<n>At the lower level, AdaRL performs policy optimization under fixed-rank constraints with dynamics sampled from a Wasserstein ball around a centroid model.<n>At the upper level, it adaptively adjusts the rank to balance the bias--variance trade-off, projecting policy parameters onto a low-rank manifold.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-13T20:05:34Z) - Stabilizing Policy Gradients for Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning in LLM Reasoning [77.92320830700797]
Reinforcement Learning has played a central role in enabling reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models.<n>We propose a tractable computational framework that tracks and leverages curvature information during policy updates.<n>The algorithm, Curvature-Aware Policy Optimization (CAPO), identifies samples that contribute to unstable updates and masks them out.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-01T12:29:32Z) - Rectified Robust Policy Optimization for Model-Uncertain Constrained Reinforcement Learning without Strong Duality [53.525547349715595]
We propose a novel primal-only algorithm called Rectified Robust Policy Optimization (RRPO)<n>RRPO operates directly on the primal problem without relying on dual formulations.<n>We show convergence to an approximately optimal feasible policy with complexity matching the best-known lower bound.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-24T16:59:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.