Human-Provenance Verification should be Treated as Labor Infrastructure in AI-Saturated Markets

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.03210v1
• Date: Mon, 04 May 2026 22:56:13 GMT
• Title: Human-Provenance Verification should be Treated as Labor Infrastructure in AI-Saturated Markets
• Abstract summary: We argue that AI markets are likely to create Veblengood premiums, which we term humanprovenance premiums, for verified human presence.<n>We argue that this pressure may produce an asymmetric barbell-shaped structure of value capture in advanced economies.
• Score: 0.9883261192383612
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We argue that AI-saturated markets are likely to create Veblen-good premiums, which we term human-provenance premiums, for verified human presence, and hence AI governance should treat human-provenance verification as labor infrastructure. Generative and agentic AI systems lower the cost of many standardized cognitive, creative, and coordination tasks, weakening the scarcity premiums that have supported much middle-tier knowledge work. We argue that this pressure may produce an asymmetric barbell-shaped structure of value capture in advanced economies: high-volume synthetic production controlled by owners of AI infrastructure at one pole, and scarce, high-status human labor valued for verified human presence at the other. We advance three claims. First, AI compresses the value of standardized middle-tier labor by making good-enough synthetic substitutes scalable at low marginal cost, hollowing out the middle of the skill distribution currently categorized by knowledge work. Second, this compression reallocates demand for human labor toward work valued for its visible human character. We term this performative humanity and distinguish three forms of labor: relational presence, aesthetic provenance, and accountability. Third, as these premiums depend on credible verification, AI governance should treat human-provenance systems as labor infrastructure rather than as luxury authenticity labels. To evaluate hybrid human-AI work, we propose constitutive human presence as the relevant standard: human labor retains premium value when human judgment, attention, accountability, authorship, or relational participation is not incidental to the output but constitutive of what is being purchased.

Related papers

• When Does AI Augment Work? A Workflow-Level Framework for Human-Agent Collaboration [78.16115745870405]
  We aim to characterise the value of artificial intelligence in the workplace.<n>Current studies largely measure this value in terms of the current automation capabilities and public adoption of AI.<n>To account for this, we must expand the scope of our analysis beyond atomised tasks of today.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-11T06:29:34Z)
• The Boundaries of Automation: A Theory of Persistent Human Participation [107.84677954791773]
  We argue that human participation may persist even with highly capable AI systems.<n>In some activities, the target is not fully specified in advance but instead emerges through the interaction itself.<n>This perspective has important implications for the limits of automation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-23T17:33:43Z)
• The Human-AI Substitution Principle: When will you be replaced by AI in your organization? [1.9927371365552295]
  We present an analytical model for studying Human--AI Task Allocation in hierarchical organizations.<n>We show that AI adoption can produce abrupt workforce transitions, hybrid human--AI organizations.<n>The paper connects automation economics, organizational design, AI governance, and workforce planning into a unified theory of AI-driven organizational transformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-22T23:04:26Z)
• Nonuniformity Principle in Human-AI Coworking [7.8976567245659615]
  In generative AI, human judgment and involvement remain essential for ensuring the quality of AI-generated outputs.<n>It is desirable for human experts to provide oversight on AI regularly, often by reviewing intermediate outputs, giving feedback, making corrections, and steering subsequent steps.<n>This creates a tension between the need for human oversight and AI's efficiency in delivering more output with less intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-17T22:10:07Z)
• Human Capital, AI, and Labor Commoditization [0.0]
  We find that in more AI-exposed job categories, the importance of human capital declines and the importance of price rises, suggesting a commoditization effect of AI on labor.<n>Our results have implications for the design of online labor markets, workers' incentives to invest in human capital, and labor welfare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-20T04:42:33Z)
• CollabSkill: Evaluating Human-Agent Collaboration On Real-World Tasks [55.84031315625504]
  CollabSkill is a framework for evaluating human-agent collaboration on real-world occupational tasks.<n>It pairs real human workers with AI agents on tasks matched to their occupational background.<n>Our analysis reveals that practical experience emerges as the primary driver of collaboration skill.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T03:03:25Z)
• Epistemology gives a Future to Complementarity in Human-AI Interactions [42.371764229953165]
  complementarity is the claim that a human supported by an AI system can outperform either alone in a decision-making process.<n>We argue that historical instances of complementarity function as evidence that a given human-AI interaction is a reliable process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T21:04:28Z)
• AI Autonomy Coefficient ($α$): Defining Boundaries for Responsible AI Systems [0.15293427903448018]
  Integrity of contemporary AI systems is compromised by misuse of Human-in-the-Loop models.<n>We introduce the AI-First, Human-Empowered (AFHE) paradigm, which requires AI systems to demonstrate a quantifiable level of functional independence.<n>We conclude that AFHE provides a metric-driven approach for ensuring verifiable autonomy, transparency, and sustainable operational integrity in modern AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-12T05:41:20Z)
• The human-machine paradox: how collaboration creates or destroys value, and why augmentation is key to resolving it [0.0]
  We argue that the true bottom-line economic utility of a human-machine skill policy is dangerously misunderstood.<n>Our results show that in complex scenarios, a human-machine strategy can yield the highest economic utility, but only if genuine augmentation is achieved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-17T15:03:39Z)
• AI as IA: The use and abuse of artificial intelligence (AI) for human enhancement through intellectual augmentation (IA) [45.88028371034407]
  This paper offers an overview of the prospects and ethics of using AI to achieve human enhancement.<n>We discuss potential ethical problems, namely inadequate performance, safety, coercion and manipulation, privacy, cognitive liberty, authenticity, and fairness.<n>We conclude that while there are very significant technical hurdles to real human enhancement through AI, and significant ethical problems, there are also significant benefits that may realistically be achieved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-18T09:39:11Z)
• Effort-aware Fairness: Incorporating a Philosophy-informed, Human-centered Notion of Effort into Algorithmic Fairness Metrics [44.14690069232159]
  We propose a philosophy-informed approach to conceptualize and evaluate Effort-aware Fairness (EaF)<n>Our work may enable AI model auditors to uncover and potentially correct unfair decisions against individuals who have spent significant efforts to improve but are still stuck with systemic disadvantages outside their control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T21:07:13Z)
• AI Safety Should Prioritize the Future of Work [13.076075926681522]
  Current efforts in AI safety prioritize filtering harmful content, preventing manipulation of human behavior, and eliminating existential risks in cybersecurity or biosecurity.<n>While pressing, this narrow focus overlooks critical human-centric considerations that shape the long-term trajectory of a society.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T23:12:30Z)
• On Benchmarking Human-Like Intelligence in Machines [77.55118048492021]
  We argue that current AI evaluation paradigms are insufficient for assessing human-like cognitive capabilities.<n>We identify a set of key shortcomings: a lack of human-validated labels, inadequate representation of human response variability and uncertainty, and reliance on simplified and ecologically-invalid tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T20:21:36Z)
• Improving Task Instructions for Data Annotators: How Clear Rules and Higher Pay Increase Performance in Data Annotation in the AI Economy [0.0]
  The global surge in AI applications is transforming industries, leading to displacement and complementation of existing jobs, while also giving rise to new employment opportunities. Data annotation, encompassing the labelling of images or annotating of texts by human workers, crucially influences the quality of a dataset directly influences the quality of AI models trained on it. This paper delves into the economics of data annotation, with a specific focus on the impact of task instruction design and monetary incentives on data quality and costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T09:50:57Z)
• Can Machines Imitate Humans? Integrative Turing-like tests for Language and Vision Demonstrate a Narrowing Gap [56.611702960809644]
  We benchmark AI's ability to imitate humans in three language tasks and three vision tasks.<n>Next, we conducted 72,191 Turing-like tests with 1,916 human judges and 10 AI judges.<n>Imitation ability showed minimal correlation with conventional AI performance metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-23T16:16:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.