Mechanical Conscience: A Mathematical Framework for Dependability of Machine Intelligenc
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.03847v1
- Date: Tue, 05 May 2026 15:14:02 GMT
- Title: Mechanical Conscience: A Mathematical Framework for Dependability of Machine Intelligenc
- Abstract summary: This paper introduces mechanical conscience (MC), a novel concept and simplified mathematical framework.<n>MC operationalizes trajectory-level normative regulation for both single-agent and distributed intelligent systems.<n>Core theoretical properties are established: admissibility equivalence, existence of optimal regulation, and monotonic deviation reduction.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Distributed collaborative intelligence (DCI), encompassing edge-to-edge architectures, federated learning, transfer learning, and swarm systems, creates environments in which emergent risk is structurally unavoidable: locally correct decisions by individual agents compose into globally unacceptable behavioral trajectories under uncertainty. Existing approaches such as constrained optimization, safe reinforcement learning, and runtime assurance evaluate acceptability at the level of individual actions rather than across behavioral trajectories, and none addresses the multi-participant, uncertainty-laden nature of DCI deployments. This paper introduces mechanical conscience (MC), a novel concept and simplified mathematical framework that operationalizes trajectory-level normative regulation for both single-agent and distributed intelligent systems. Mechanical conscience is defined as a supervisory filter that minimally corrects a baseline policy's actions to reduce cumulative deviation from a normatively admissible region, while accounting for epistemic uncertainty. We introduce associated constructs, conscience score, mechanical guilt, and resonant dependability, that provide an interpretable vocabulary and computable governance signals for this emerging field. Core theoretical properties are established: admissibility equivalence, existence of optimal regulation, and monotonic deviation reduction. Illustrative results demonstrate that MC-regulated agents maintain trajectory-level normative acceptability where conventional controllers drift outside admissible bounds, and that the framework naturally extends to suppress interaction-induced emergent risk in multi-agent DCI settings.
Related papers
- Provably Secure Agent Guardrail [89.79561918065122]
Existing defense architectures rely on empirical semantic guardrails and probabilistic large model adjudicators.<n>This paper proposes a new security paradigm for agents based on the fundamental limitations of logical reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-28T02:12:41Z) - Provable Robustness against Backdoor Attacks via the Primal-Dual Perspective on Differential Privacy [51.758416625168]
Randomized smoothing is a powerful tool for certifying robustness to adversarial perturbations.<n>We propose a framework for certification of complex, composed mechanisms.<n>We provide a principled and general framework for using composite mechanisms to certify robustness under complex threat models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-20T22:17:29Z) - Towards a Risk-Cost Model for Financial Adaptive Authentication [9.133320151595084]
We introduce a formal Risk-Cost Model (RCM) for adaptive authentication in financial systems.<n>The RCM integrates three essential components: (i) cost-sensitive risk functions that explicitly capture fraud loss, opportunity cost, and tail risk through Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), and (ii) sequential decision-making mechanisms that adapt to adversarial probing and distributional drift.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-04T02:08:24Z) - MC-CPO: Mastery-Conditioned Constrained Policy Optimization [1.4323566945483497]
Engagement-optimized adaptive tutoring systems may prioritize short-term behavioral signals over sustained learning outcomes.<n>We introduce Mastery-Conditioned Constrained Policy Optimization (MC-CPO), a two-timescale primal-dual algorithm that integrates structural action masking with constrained policy optimization.<n>Across 10 random seeds and one million training steps in the neural regime, MC-CPO satisfies constraint budgets within tolerance, reduces safety costs relative to unconstrained and reward-shaped baselines, and substantially lowers the Reward Hacking Severity Index (RHSI)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-05T20:13:34Z) - GRASP: Gradient Realignment via Active Shared Perception for Multi-Agent Collaborative Optimization [41.52202306408042]
Non-stationarity arises from concurrent policy updates and leads to persistent environmental fluctuations.<n>We propose Realignment via Active Shared Perception (GRASP), a novel framework that defines generalized Bellman equilibrium as a stable objective for policy evolution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-01T10:26:22Z) - Beyond Benchmark Islands: Toward Representative Trustworthiness Evaluation for Agentic AI [45.21562889170875]
We propose a systematic evaluation paradigm that characterizes agent trustworthiness over a scenario manifold.<n>The framework integrates four complementary components: static cognitive and policy analysis, (ii) interactive sandbox simulation, (iii) social-ethical alignment assessment, and (iv) a distribution-aware representative sampling engine.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-16T08:51:33Z) - Accelerated Online Risk-Averse Policy Evaluation in POMDPs with Theoretical Guarantees and Novel CVaR Bounds [9.269394037577177]
This work introduces a theoretical framework for accelerating Conditional Value-at-Risk evaluation in partially observable domains.<n>We establish upper and lower bounds on the CVaR value function computable from a simplified belief-MDP.<n>We develop estimators for these bounds within a particle-belief MDP framework with probabilistic guarantees.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-26T15:01:40Z) - Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction via Transformer-Based Models [45.08545174556591]
We propose an unsupervised anomaly detection framework based on a multi-agent Transformer.<n>A dual evaluation scheme has been proposed to assess both detection stability and physical alignment.<n>Our framework identifies 388 unique anomalies missed by Time-to-Collision and statistical baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-28T08:33:10Z) - From Linear Risk to Emergent Harm: Complexity as the Missing Core of AI Governance [0.0]
Risk-based AI regulation promises proportional controls aligned with anticipated harms.<n>This paper argues that such frameworks often fail for structural reasons.<n>We propose a complexity-based framework for AI governance that treats regulation as intervention rather than control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-14T14:19:21Z) - Norm-Governed Multi-Agent Decision-Making in Simulator-Coupled Environments:The Reinsurance Constrained Multi-Agent Simulation Process (R-CMASP) [0.0]
We show how a domain-calibrated synthetic environment that governed multi-agent coordination yields more stable, coherent, and norm-adherent behaviour than deterministic automation.<n>Results suggest that regulated, simulator-driven decision environments are most naturally modelled as norm-governed, simulator-coupled multi-agent systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-04T10:30:26Z) - A Survey on Autonomy-Induced Security Risks in Large Model-Based Agents [45.53643260046778]
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have catalyzed the rise of autonomous AI agents.<n>These large-model agents mark a paradigm shift from static inference systems to interactive, memory-augmented entities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-30T13:34:34Z) - Sample-Efficient Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in the Face of Environmental Uncertainty [40.55653383218379]
This work focuses on learning in distributionally robust Markov games (RMGs)
We propose a sample-efficient model-based algorithm (DRNVI) with finite-sample complexity guarantees for learning robust variants of various notions of game-theoretic equilibria.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-29T17:51:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.