Measuring Psychological States Through Semantic Projection: A Theory-Driven Approach to Language-Based Assessment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04873v1
• Date: Wed, 06 May 2026 13:07:29 GMT
• Title: Measuring Psychological States Through Semantic Projection: A Theory-Driven Approach to Language-Based Assessment
• Abstract summary: The present study introduces a theory-driven and fully unsupervised framework for measuring psychological states directly from natural language using semantic projection.<n> Psychological constructs were operationalized as interpretable semantic axes derived from lexical anchors and items from validated clinical scales assessing depression, anxiety, and worry.<n>Results showed strong associations between projection scores and clinical measures, particularly for structured formats such as selected words, written words, and phrases.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in natural language processing have enabled increasingly accurate estimation of psychological traits from language. However, most existing approaches rely on supervised models trained to predict questionnaire scores, limiting interpretability and generalizability across contexts. The present study introduces a theory-driven and fully unsupervised framework for measuring psychological states directly from natural language using semantic projection. Psychological constructs were operationalized as interpretable semantic axes derived from lexical anchors and items from validated clinical scales assessing depression, anxiety, and worry. Participants textual responses were embedded using Sentence-BERT and projected onto these axes to generate continuous psychological scores across multiple response formats, including selected words, generated words, phrases, and free-text responses. Projection scores were evaluated through correlations with standardized clinical measures , split-half reliability analyses, attenuation corrections, distributional similarity using Wasserstein distance, and comparisons with lexicon-based sentiment analysis (VADER). Results showed strong associations between projection scores and clinical measures, particularly for structured formats such as selected words, written words, and phrases. Free-text responses produced weaker results when analyzed as whole texts, but performance improved substantially when sentence-level aggregation strategies were applied. These findings support semantic projection as an interpretable and scalable alternative to supervised language models for psychological assessment and highlight the importance of response format and text-processing strategies in language-based mental health measurement.

Related papers

• Cross-Subject Semantic Decoding with Shared-Space Alignment for Generalized Neural Representation Learning [80.18561652862725]
  Generalizing across subjects remains challenging in invasive neural recordings.<n>We propose a cross-subject semantic decoding framework that aligns neural responses to speech perception from multiple subjects into a shared latent space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-03T03:59:16Z)
• Multi-Level Narrative Evaluation Outperforms Lexical Features for Mental Health [23.379143894811566]
  Computational approaches to therapeutic writing have evolved from lexical counting to neural methods, yet remain fragmented.<n>No existing framework maps these techniques onto the hierarchical processes through which narratives are constructed.<n>This framework identifies macro-structural organization as the primary locus of clinical signal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T13:31:56Z)
• Lyapunov Spectral Analysis of Speech Embedding Trajectories in Psychosis [63.56564189749175]
  We analyze speech embeddings from structured clinical interviews of psychotic patients and healthy controls.<n>Lyapunov exponent (LE) spectra are computed from word-level and answer-level embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-18T08:46:46Z)
• Linguistic Indicators of Early Cognitive Decline in the DementiaBank Pitt Corpus: A Statistical and Machine Learning Study [4.417564179511245]
  This study analyzes spontaneous speech transcripts from the DementiaBank Pitt Corpus using three linguistic representations.<n> syntactic and grammatical features retain strong discriminative power even in the absence of lexical content.<n>This study supports the use of linguistically grounded features for transparent and reliable language-based cognitive screening.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T16:53:57Z)
• On the Fallacy of Global Token Perplexity in Spoken Language Model Evaluation [88.77441715819366]
  Generative spoken language models pretrained on large-scale raw audio can continue a speech prompt with appropriate content.<n>We propose a variety of likelihood- and generative-based evaluation methods that serve in place of naive global token perplexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T22:01:56Z)
• PsycholexTherapy: Simulating Reasoning in Psychotherapy with Small Language Models in Persian [2.166951056466717]
  PsychoLexTherapy is a framework for simulating psychotherapeutic reasoning in Persian using small language models (SLMs)<n>PsychoLexTherapy is optimized for on-device deployment, enabling use without external servers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-04T19:40:10Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models with Psychometrics [59.821829073478376]
  This paper offers a comprehensive benchmark for quantifying psychological constructs of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our work identifies five key psychological constructs -- personality, values, emotional intelligence, theory of mind, and self-efficacy -- assessed through a suite of 13 datasets.<n>We uncover significant discrepancies between LLMs' self-reported traits and their response patterns in real-world scenarios, revealing complexities in their behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T16:09:08Z)
• LLM Questionnaire Completion for Automatic Psychiatric Assessment [49.1574468325115]
  We employ a Large Language Model (LLM) to convert unstructured psychological interviews into structured questionnaires spanning various psychiatric and personality domains. The obtained answers are coded as features, which are used to predict standardized psychiatric measures of depression (PHQ-8) and PTSD (PCL-C)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-09T09:03:11Z)
• Estimating Lexical Complexity from Document-Level Distributions [0.0]
  We develop a two-step approach for estimating lexical complexity that does not rely on any pre-annotated data. We also investigate the relationship between our complexity measure and certain features typically associated with complexity in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T15:55:18Z)
• How Well Do Text Embedding Models Understand Syntax? [50.440590035493074]
  The ability of text embedding models to generalize across a wide range of syntactic contexts remains under-explored. Our findings reveal that existing text embedding models have not sufficiently addressed these syntactic understanding challenges. We propose strategies to augment the generalization ability of text embedding models in diverse syntactic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T08:51:00Z)
• Pose-based Body Language Recognition for Emotion and Psychiatric Symptom Interpretation [75.3147962600095]
  We propose an automated framework for body language based emotion recognition starting from regular RGB videos. In collaboration with psychologists, we extend the framework for psychiatric symptom prediction. Because a specific application domain of the proposed framework may only supply a limited amount of data, the framework is designed to work on a small training set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-30T18:45:16Z)
• Constructing a Testbed for Psychometric Natural Language Processing [0.5801044612920815]
  We describe our efforts to construct a corpus for psychometric natural language processing (NLP) We discuss our multi-step process to align user text with their survey-based response items. We report preliminary results on the use of the text to categorize/predict users' survey response labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-25T16:29:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.