An Empirical Study of Proactive Coding Assistants in Real-World Software Development

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05700v1
• Date: Thu, 07 May 2026 05:44:52 GMT
• Title: An Empirical Study of Proactive Coding Assistants in Real-World Software Development
• Abstract summary: Large language model (LLM)-based coding assistants have made substantial progress, yet most systems remain reactive.<n> Proactive coding assistants aim to infer latent developer intent from integrated development environment (IDE) interactions and repository context.<n>Research in this direction is limited by the scarcity of large-scale real-world developer behavior data.
• Score: 7.0725208875067045
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based coding assistants have made substantial progress, yet most systems remain reactive, requiring developers to explicitly formulate their needs. Proactive coding assistants aim to infer latent developer intent from integrated development environment (IDE) interactions and repository context, thereby reducing interaction overhead and supporting more seamless assistance. However, research in this direction is limited by the scarcity of large-scale real-world developer behavior data. Existing studies therefore often rely on LLM-simulated IDE traces, whose fidelity to real development behavior remains unclear. In this paper, we investigate this simulation-to-reality gap through a large-scale empirical study. We collect real IDE interaction traces from 1{,}246 experienced industry developers over three consecutive days using a custom Visual Studio Code extension, and construct paired LLM-simulated traces for controlled comparison. Our analysis shows that simulated traces differ substantially from real traces in behavioral diversity, temporal structure, and exploratory patterns. Based on the collected data, we introduce \textbf{ProCodeBench}, a real-world benchmark for proactive intent prediction. Experiments with representative LLMs, retrieval-augmented methods, and agentic baselines show that current approaches remain far from reliable under real IDE traces, suggesting that simulation-based evaluation can overestimate real-world performance. Finally, our training study shows that simulated data cannot replace real data, but can complement it when used before real-world fine-tuning. These findings highlight the importance of real developer behavior data for evaluating and training proactive coding assistants.

Related papers

• Reliable and Developer-Aligned Evaluation of Agents for Software Engineering [0.5922488908114023]
  This research aims to bridge the gap by providing a comprehensive evaluation methodology for LLM-powered agents.<n>Our evaluation approach focuses on contamination-awareness, in-the-wild agentic behavior assessment, and trajectory-aware benchmarks and metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-07T18:29:50Z)
• SEARL: Joint Optimization of Policy and Tool Graph Memory for Self-Evolving Agents [35.45207852488779]
  We introduce a Tool-Memory based self-evolving agentic framework SEARL.<n>Unlike approaches that directly utilize interaction experiences, our method constructs a structured experience memory that integrates planning with execution.<n>We evaluate our framework on knowledge reasoning and mathematics tasks, demonstrating its effectiveness in achieving more practical and efficient learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T04:38:47Z)
• Understanding by Reconstruction: Reversing the Software Development Process for LLM Pretraining [66.89012795621349]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with the deep, long-horizon reasoning required for complex software engineering.<n>We propose a novel paradigm: understanding via reconstruction.<n>We introduce a framework that synthesizes latent agentic trajectories using a multi-agent simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T09:23:20Z)
• Understanding Specification-Driven Code Generation with LLMs: An Empirical Study Design [2.687678248171195]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into software development, yet their behavior in structured, specification-driven processes remains poorly understood.<n>This paper presents an empirical study design using CURRANTE, a Visual Studio Code extension that enables a human-in-the-loop workflow for LLM-assisted code generation.<n>The study aims to analyze how human intervention in specification and test refinement influences the quality and dynamics of LLM-generated code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T12:46:57Z)
• Scaling Environments for LLM Agents in the Era of Learning from Interaction: A Survey [30.673419015614233]
  A growing consensus is that agents should interact directly with environments and learn from experience through reinforcement learning.<n>We formalize this iterative process as the Generation-Execution-Feedback (GEF) loop, where environments generate tasks to challenge agents, return observations in response to agents' actions during task execution, and provide evaluative feedback on rollouts for subsequent learning.<n>Under this paradigm, environments function as indispensable producers of experiential data, highlighting the need to scale them toward greater complexity, realism, and interactivity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-12T12:56:25Z)
• See, Think, Act: Online Shopper Behavior Simulation with VLM Agents [58.92444959954643]
  This paper investigates the integration of visual information, specifically webpage screenshots, into behavior simulation via VLMs.<n>We employ SFT for joint action prediction and rationale generation, conditioning on the full interaction context.<n>To further enhance reasoning capabilities, we integrate RL with a hierarchical reward structure, scaled by a difficulty-aware factor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T05:07:14Z)
• Sample-Efficient Online Learning in LM Agents via Hindsight Trajectory Rewriting [92.57796055887995]
  We introduce ECHO, a prompting framework that adapts hindsight experience replay from reinforcement learning for language model agents.<n> ECHO generates optimized trajectories for alternative goals that could have been achieved during failed attempts.<n>We evaluate ECHO on stateful versions of XMiniGrid, a text-based navigation and planning benchmark, and PeopleJoinQA, a collaborative information-gathering enterprise simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T18:11:09Z)
• RECODE-H: A Benchmark for Research Code Development with Interactive Human Feedback [87.97664892075811]
  We present RECODE-H, a benchmark of 102 tasks from research papers and repositories.<n>It includes structured instructions,unit tests, and a five-level feedback hierarchy to reflect realistic researcher-agent collaboration.<n>We also present ReCodeAgent, a framework that integrates feedback into iterative code generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T17:45:35Z)
• Experience Scaling: Post-Deployment Evolution For Large Language Models [44.48142891798125]
  We propose experience scaling, a framework for continuous post-deployment evolution for large language models (LLMs)<n>We validate the framework in simulated real-world scenarios involving generalization to previously unseen but related tasks, repetitive queries, and over-saturated knowledge stores.<n>Results demonstrate that structured post-deployment learning can extend LLM capabilities beyond the limits of static human-generated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T08:04:58Z)
• MLE-Dojo: Interactive Environments for Empowering LLM Agents in Machine Learning Engineering [57.156093929365255]
  Gym-style framework for systematically reinforcement learning, evaluating, and improving autonomous large language model (LLM) agents.<n>MLE-Dojo covers diverse, open-ended MLE tasks carefully curated to reflect realistic engineering scenarios.<n>Its fully executable environment supports comprehensive agent training via both supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T17:35:43Z)
• HumanEvo: An Evolution-aware Benchmark for More Realistic Evaluation of Repository-level Code Generation [36.1669124651617]
  We conduct an empirical study to understand Large Language Models' code generation performance within settings that reflect the evolution nature of software development.<n>We use an evolution-aware repository-level code generation dataset, namely HumanEvo, equipped with an automated execution-based evaluation tool.<n>We find that previous evolution-ignored evaluation methods result in inflated performance of LLMs, with performance overestimations ranging from 10.0% to 61.1%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T03:19:18Z)
• CTP: Towards Vision-Language Continual Pretraining via Compatible Momentum Contrast and Topology Preservation [128.00940554196976]
  Vision-Language Continual Pretraining (VLCP) has shown impressive results on diverse downstream tasks by offline training on large-scale datasets. To support the study of Vision-Language Continual Pretraining (VLCP), we first contribute a comprehensive and unified benchmark dataset P9D. The data from each industry as an independent task supports continual learning and conforms to the real-world long-tail nature to simulate pretraining on web data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-14T13:53:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.