PragLocker: Protecting Agent Intellectual Property in Untrusted Deployments via Non-Portable Prompts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05974v1
• Date: Thu, 07 May 2026 10:19:06 GMT
• Title: PragLocker: Protecting Agent Intellectual Property in Untrusted Deployments via Non-Portable Prompts
• Abstract summary: LLM agents rely on prompts to implement task-specific capabilities based on foundation LLMs.<n>In untrusted deployments, adversaries can copy and reuse these prompts with other proprietary LLMs, causing economic losses.<n>We present PragLocker, a prompt protection scheme that satisfies these requirements.
• Score: 18.735200590753525
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: LLM agents rely on prompts to implement task-specific capabilities based on foundation LLMs, making agent prompts valuable intellectual property. However, in untrusted deployments, adversaries can copy and reuse these prompts with other proprietary LLMs, causing economic losses. To protect these prompts, we identify four key challenges: proactivity, runtime protection, usability, and non-portability that existing approaches fail to address. We present PragLocker, a prompt protection scheme that satisfies these requirements. PragLocker constructs function-preserving obfuscated prompts by anchoring semantics with code symbols and then using target-model feedback to inject noise, yielding prompts that only work on the target LLM. Experiments across multiple agent systems, datasets, and foundation LLMs show that PragLocker substantially reduces cross-LLM portability, maintains target performance, and remains robust against adaptive attackers.

Related papers

• Securing LLM Agents Need Intent-to-Execution Integrity [49.490963596514185]
  We argue that securing LLM agents requires defining an end-to-end correctness property that specifies when an agent's execution faithfully reflects the user's intent.<n>We observe that LLM agents are structurally analogous to compilers, where security violations correspond to mis-executions that do not preserve user intent.<n>We derive four integrity properties that must hold simultaneously: emphTool Integrity, emphInstruction Integrity, emphJudgment Integrity, and emphData Flow Integrity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-16T12:53:31Z)
• A Framework for Formalizing LLM Agent Security [46.86073273904095]
  Security in LLM agents is inherently contextual.<n>Existing definitions of security attacks against LLM agents often fail to capture this contextual nature.<n>We present a framework that systematizes existing attacks and defenses from the perspective of contextual security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T21:01:49Z)
• PSM: Prompt Sensitivity Minimization via LLM-Guided Black-Box Optimization [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel framework for hardening system prompts through shield appending.<n>We leverage an LLM-as-optimizer to search the space of possible SHIELDs, seeking to minimize a leakage metric derived from a suite of adversarial attacks.<n>We demonstrate empirically that our optimized SHIELDs significantly reduce prompt leakage against a comprehensive set of extraction attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T10:25:45Z)
• CoTGuard: Using Chain-of-Thought Triggering for Copyright Protection in Multi-Agent LLM Systems [55.57181090183713]
  We introduce CoTGuard, a novel framework for copyright protection that leverages trigger-based detection within Chain-of-Thought reasoning.<n>Specifically, we can activate specific CoT segments and monitor intermediate reasoning steps for unauthorized content reproduction by embedding specific trigger queries into agent prompts.<n>This approach enables fine-grained, interpretable detection of copyright violations in collaborative agent scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T01:42:37Z)
• AgentVigil: Generic Black-Box Red-teaming for Indirect Prompt Injection against LLM Agents [54.29555239363013]
  We propose a generic black-box fuzzing framework, AgentVigil, to automatically discover and exploit indirect prompt injection vulnerabilities.<n>We evaluate AgentVigil on two public benchmarks, AgentDojo and VWA-adv, where it achieves 71% and 70% success rates against agents based on o3-mini and GPT-4o.<n>We apply our attacks in real-world environments, successfully misleading agents to navigate to arbitrary URLs, including malicious sites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T07:40:17Z)
• Defeating Prompt Injections by Design [79.00910871948787]
  CaMeL is a robust defense that creates a protective system layer around the Large Language Models.<n>To operate, CaMeL explicitly extracts the control and data flows from the (trusted) query.<n>To further improve security, CaMeL uses a notion of a capability to prevent the exfiltration of private data over unauthorized data flows.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T15:54:10Z)
• Prompt Flow Integrity to Prevent Privilege Escalation in LLM Agents [12.072737324367937]
  We propose Prompt Flow Integrity (PFI) to prevent privilege escalation in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>PFI features three mitigation techniques -- i.e., agent isolation, secure untrusted data processing, and privilege escalation guardrails.<n>Our evaluation result shows that PFI effectively mitigates privilege escalation attacks while successfully preserving the utility of LLM agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-17T05:27:57Z)
• Automating Prompt Leakage Attacks on Large Language Models Using Agentic Approach [9.483655213280738]
  This paper presents a novel approach to evaluating the security of large language models (LLMs)<n>We define prompt leakage as a critical threat to secure LLM deployment.<n>We implement a multi-agent system where cooperative agents are tasked with probing and exploiting the target LLM to elicit its prompt.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T08:17:32Z)
• GuardAgent: Safeguard LLM Agents by a Guard Agent via Knowledge-Enabled Reasoning [79.07152553060601]
  We propose GuardAgent, the first guardrail agent to protect target agents by dynamically checking whether their actions satisfy given safety guard requests.<n>Specifically, GuardAgent first analyzes the safety guard requests to generate a task plan, and then maps this plan into guardrail code for execution.<n>We show that GuardAgent effectively moderates the violation actions for different types of agents on two benchmarks with over 98% and 83% guardrail accuracies, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:49:26Z)
• AdaShield: Safeguarding Multimodal Large Language Models from Structure-based Attack via Adaptive Shield Prompting [54.931241667414184]
  We propose textbfAdaptive textbfShield Prompting, which prepends inputs with defense prompts to defend MLLMs against structure-based jailbreak attacks. Our methods can consistently improve MLLMs' robustness against structure-based jailbreak attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T15:57:13Z)
• Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models [79.0183835295533]
  We introduce the first benchmark for indirect prompt injection attacks, named BIPIA, to assess the risk of such vulnerabilities.<n>Our analysis identifies two key factors contributing to their success: LLMs' inability to distinguish between informational context and actionable instructions, and their lack of awareness in avoiding the execution of instructions within external content.<n>We propose two novel defense mechanisms-boundary awareness and explicit reminder-to address these vulnerabilities in both black-box and white-box settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T01:08:39Z)
• Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection [64.67495502772866]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being integrated into various applications. We show how attackers can override original instructions and employed controls using Prompt Injection attacks. We derive a comprehensive taxonomy from a computer security perspective to systematically investigate impacts and vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T17:14:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.