Improving the Efficiency of Language Agent Teams with Adaptive Task Graphs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06320v1
- Date: Thu, 07 May 2026 14:19:17 GMT
- Title: Improving the Efficiency of Language Agent Teams with Adaptive Task Graphs
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in teams, yet existing coordination approaches often occupy two extremes.<n>We introduce Language Agent Teams for Task Evolution (LATTE), a framework for coordinating LLM teams inspired by distributed systems.
- Score: 52.26652574704317
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in teams, yet existing coordination approaches often occupy two extremes. Highly structured methods rely on fixed roles, pipelines, or task decompositions assigned a priori. In contrast, fully unstructured teams enable adaptability and exploration but suffer from inefficiencies such as error propagation, inter-agent conflicts, and wasted resources (measured in time, tokens, or file operations). We introduce Language Agent Teams for Task Evolution (LATTE), a framework for coordinating LLM teams inspired by distributed systems, where processors must operate under partial observability and communication constraints. In LATTE, a team of agents collaboratively construct and maintain a shared, evolving coordination graph which encodes sub-task dependencies, individual agent assignment, and the current state of sub-task progress. This protocol maintains consistency while empowering agents to dynamically allocate work, adapt coordination, and discover new tasks. Across multiple collaborative tasks and a variety of base models, we demonstrate how LATTE reduces token usage, wall-clock time, communication, and coordination failures (e.g. file conflicts and redundant outputs) while matching or exceeding the accuracy of standard designs including MetaGPT, decentralized teams, top-down Leader-Worker hierarchies, and static decompositions.
Related papers
- Inference-Time Graph Engineering for Multi-Agent LLM Workflows [51.56038180639833]
We introduce ReActNet, a training-free framework that compiles a query and a set of role-specialized agents into a sequence of directed communication graphs.<n>We show that ReActNet consistently improves over fixed-topology and learned-topology baselines while maintaining competitive inference cost.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-04T23:32:11Z) - Communication-Efficient Digital-Twin Coordination for Heterogeneous LLM Embodied Agents over Computing Power Networks [48.90302419915548]
Embodied agent teams powered by heterogeneous large language models (LLMs) are being widely deployed in smart factories, warehouses, and service robotics.<n>We propose LDT-Coord, a networked coordination framework built upon a lightweight digital twin (DT)<n>Specifically, each agent independently selects its intended action and reports both the action decision and a structured temporal constraint over shared resources to the DT server.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-10T12:10:31Z) - Benchmarking Open-Ended Multi-Agent Coordination in Language Agents [48.1363632826625]
Alem embeds procedurally generated coordination tasks, soft specialisation, communication, and controllable coordination difficulty into a long-horizon survival world.<n>We introduce $alem$, a JAX-based benchmark for open-ended multi-agent coordination built on Craftax-like dynamics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-06T21:13:43Z) - HULK: Large-scale Hierarchical Coordination under Continual and Uncertain Temporal Tasks [5.337512368549053]
This work tackles the large-scale coordination problem under continual and uncertain temporal tasks.<n>The proposed hierarchical framework, HULK, consists of two interleaved layers: the rolling assignment of currently known tasks to subteams within a certain horizon, and the dynamic coordination within a subteam given the detected subtasks during online execution.<n>The method is validated rigorously over large-scale heterogeneous systems under various temporal tasks and environment uncertainties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-09T06:10:40Z) - Small Model as Master Orchestrator: Learning Unified Agent-Tool Orchestration with Parallel Subtask Decomposition [61.291733522717415]
Agent-as-Tool is a unified parallel orchestration paradigm that mitigates both agents and tools into a standardized, learnable action space.<n>ParaManager decouples planning decisions from subtask solving, enabling state-aware parallel subtask decomposition, delegation, and asynchronous execution.<n>Experiments show that ParaManager achieves strong performance across multiple benchmarks and exhibits robust generalization under unseen model pools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-18T14:41:27Z) - Effective Strategies for Asynchronous Software Engineering Agents [52.76455094324273]
We introduce a structured multi-agent coordination paradigm grounded in three core SWE primitives: centralized task delegation, asynchronous execution, and isolated workspaces.<n>We find that CAID improves accuracy over single-agent baselines by 26.7% absolute on paper reproduction tasks (PaperBench) and 14.3% on Python library development tasks (Commit0).
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-23T02:26:35Z) - GoAgent: Group-of-Agents Communication Topology Generation for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems [55.12339141172908]
GoAgent is a communication topology generation method that explicitly treats collaborative groups as the atomic units of MAS construction.<n>Experiments on six benchmarks demonstrate the state-of-the-art performance of GoAgent with 93.84% average accuracy while reducing token consumption by about 17%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-20T06:21:32Z) - Verification-Aware Planning for Multi-Agent Systems [35.82875628010279]
We present VeriMAP, a framework for multi-agent collaboration with verification-aware planning.<n>The planner decomposes tasks, models subtask dependencies, and encodes planner-defined passing criteria.<n>We show how verification-aware planning enables reliable coordination and iterative refinement in multi-agent systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-20T02:54:29Z) - Learning to Interact in World Latent for Team Coordination [53.51290193631586]
This work presents a novel representation learning framework, interactive world latent (IWoL), to facilitate team coordination in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL)<n>Our key insight is to construct a learnable representation space that jointly captures inter-agent relations and task-specific world information by directly modeling communication protocols.<n>Our representation can be used not only as an implicit latent for each agent, but also as an explicit message for communication.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-29T22:13:39Z) - Federation of Agents: A Semantics-Aware Communication Fabric for Large-Scale Agentic AI [1.8244641115869653]
We present Federation of Agents (FoA), a distributed orchestration framework that transforms multi-agent coordination into dynamic, capability-driven collaboration.<n>FoA introduces Versioned Capability Vectors (VCVs), machine-readable profiles that make agent capabilities searchable through semantic embeddings.<n>We show 13x improvements over single-model baselines, with clustering-enhanced laboration particularly effective for complex reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-24T14:38:06Z) - XAgents: A Unified Framework for Multi-Agent Cooperation via IF-THEN Rules and Multipolar Task Processing Graph [14.273739638741139]
XAgents is a unified multi-agent cooperative framework built on a multipolar task processing graph and IF-THEN rules.<n>XAgents consistently surpasses state-of-the-art single-agent and multi-agent approaches in both knowledge-typed and logic-typed question-answering tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-12T08:40:58Z) - Towards Collaborative Intelligence: Propagating Intentions and Reasoning for Multi-Agent Coordination with Large Language Models [41.95288786980204]
Current agent frameworks often suffer from dependencies on single-agent execution and lack robust inter- module communication.
We present a framework for training large language models as collaborative agents to enable coordinated behaviors in cooperative MARL.
A propagation network transforms broadcast intentions into teammate-specific communication messages, sharing relevant goals with designated teammates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-17T13:14:00Z) - Large Language Models for Orchestrating Bimanual Robots [19.60907949776435]
We present LAnguage-model-based Bimanual ORchestration (LABOR) to analyze task configurations and devise coordination control policies.
We evaluate our method through simulated experiments involving two classes of long-horizon tasks using the NICOL humanoid robot.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-02T15:08:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.