Independent Learning of Nash Equilibria in Partially Observable Markov Potential Games with Decoupled Dynamics
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06377v1
- Date: Thu, 07 May 2026 14:56:56 GMT
- Title: Independent Learning of Nash Equilibria in Partially Observable Markov Potential Games with Decoupled Dynamics
- Abstract summary: We study Nash equilibrium learning in partially observable Markov games (POMGs)<n>We present an independent learning algorithm in which players, observing only their own actions and observations and without communication, jointly converge to an approximate Nash equilibrium.
- Score: 8.784438985280092
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We study Nash equilibrium learning in partially observable Markov games (POMGs), a multi-agent reinforcement learning framework in which agents cannot fully observe the underlying state. Prior work in this setting relies on centralization or information sharing, and suffers from sample and computational complexity that scales exponentially in the number of players. We focus on a subclass of POMGs with independent state transitions, where agents remain coupled through their rewards, and assume that the underlying fully observed Markov game is a Markov potential game. For this class, we present an independent learning algorithm in which players, observing only their own actions and observations and without communication, jointly converge to an approximate Nash equilibrium. Due to partial observability, optimal policies may in general depend on the full action-observation history. Under a filter stability assumption, we show that policies based on finite history windows provide sufficient approximation guarantees. This enables us to approximate the POMG by a surrogate Markov game that is near-potential, leading to quasi-polynomial sample and computational complexity for independent Nash equilibrium learning in the underlying POMG.
Related papers
- NePPO: Near-Potential Policy Optimization for General-Sum Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [2.1419206807872797]
We propose a new MARL pipeline called Near-Potential Policy Optimization (NePPO) for computing approximate Nash equilibria in mixed cooperative--competitive environments.<n>We show the superior performance of this approach compared to popular baselines such as MAPPO, IPPO and MADDPG.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-07T01:35:52Z) - Optimistic Policy Gradient in Multi-Player Markov Games with a Single
Controller: Convergence Beyond the Minty Property [89.96815099996132]
We develop a new framework to characterize optimistic policy gradient methods in multi-player games with a single controller.
Our approach relies on a natural generalization of the classical Minty property that we introduce, which we anticipate to have further applications beyond Markov games.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-19T11:34:10Z) - Breaking the Curse of Multiagents in a Large State Space: RL in Markov
Games with Independent Linear Function Approximation [56.715186432566576]
We propose a new model, independent linear Markov game, for reinforcement learning with a large state space and a large number of agents.
We design new algorithms for learning correlated equilibria (CCE) and Markov correlated equilibria (CE) with sample bounds complexity that only scalely with each agent's own function class complexity.
Our algorithms rely on two key technical innovations: (1) utilizing policy replay to tackle non-stationarity incurred by multiple agents and the use of function approximation; and (2) separating learning Markov equilibria and exploration in the Markov games.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-07T18:47:48Z) - Finding mixed-strategy equilibria of continuous-action games without
gradients using randomized policy networks [83.28949556413717]
We study the problem of computing an approximate Nash equilibrium of continuous-action game without access to gradients.
We model players' strategies using artificial neural networks.
This paper is the first to solve general continuous-action games with unrestricted mixed strategies and without any gradient information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-29T05:16:41Z) - Independent and Decentralized Learning in Markov Potential Games [3.549868541921029]
We study a multi-agent reinforcement learning dynamics, and analyze its behavior in infinite-horizon discounted Markov potential games.<n>We focus on the independent and decentralized setting, where players do not know the game parameters, and cannot communicate or coordinate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-29T07:39:09Z) - Efficient Model-based Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning via Optimistic
Equilibrium Computation [93.52573037053449]
H-MARL (Hallucinated Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning) learns successful equilibrium policies after a few interactions with the environment.
We demonstrate our approach experimentally on an autonomous driving simulation benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-14T17:24:03Z) - Independent Policy Gradient for Large-Scale Markov Potential Games:
Sharper Rates, Function Approximation, and Game-Agnostic Convergence [30.084357461497042]
We learn a Nash equilibrium of an MPG in which the size of state space and/or the number of players can be very large.
We propose new independent policy gradient algorithms that are run by all players in tandem.
We identify a class of independent policy gradient algorithms that enjoys convergence for both zero-sum Markov games and Markov cooperative games with the players that are oblivious to the types of games being played.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-08T20:09:47Z) - Finite-Sample Analysis of Decentralized Q-Learning for Stochastic Games [3.441021278275805]
Learning in games is arguably the most standard and fundamental setting in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL)
We establish the finite-sample complexity of fully decentralized Q-learning algorithms in a significant class of general approximation games (SGs)
We focus on the practical while challenging setting of fully decentralized MARL, where neither the rewards nor the actions of other agents can be observed by each agent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-15T03:33:39Z) - Sample-Efficient Learning of Stackelberg Equilibria in General-Sum Games [78.65798135008419]
It remains vastly open how to learn the Stackelberg equilibrium in general-sum games efficiently from samples.
This paper initiates the theoretical study of sample-efficient learning of the Stackelberg equilibrium in two-player turn-based general-sum games.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-23T05:11:07Z) - On Information Asymmetry in Competitive Multi-Agent Reinforcement
Learning: Convergence and Optimality [78.76529463321374]
We study the system of interacting non-cooperative two Q-learning agents.
We show that this information asymmetry can lead to a stable outcome of population learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-21T11:19:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.