Exploring the "Banality" of Deception in Generative AI
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07012v1
- Date: Thu, 07 May 2026 22:49:55 GMT
- Title: Exploring the "Banality" of Deception in Generative AI
- Abstract summary: Simone Natale explores banality as a lens through which to reason through deception in generative AI experiences.<n>We argue that this perspective could lead to future work for introducing friction to safeguard users from deception in generative AI interactions.
- Score: 2.706390545056605
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Current approaches to addressing deceptive design largely focus on visible interface manipulations, commonly referred to as "dark patterns". With the rise of generative AI, deception is becoming more difficult to spot and easier to live with, as it is quietly embedded in default settings, automated suggestions, and conversational interactions rather than discrete interface elements. These subtle, normalised forms of influence, which Simone Natale frames as "banal deception", shape everyday digital use and blur the line between AI-enabled assistance and manipulation. This position paper explores banality as a lens through which to reason through deception in generative AI experiences, especially with chatbots. We explore what Natale describes as users' own involvement in their deception, and argue that this perspective could lead to future work for introducing friction to safeguard users from deception in generative AI interactions, such as empowering users through raising awareness, providing them with intervention tools, and regulatory or enforcement improvements. We present these concepts as points for discussion for the deceptive design scholarly community.
Related papers
- Designing AI for Real Users -- Accessibility Gaps in Retail AI Front-End [0.0]
We argue that many AI front-ends implicitly assume an 'ideal user body and mind'<n>This becomes visible and ethically consequential when examined through the experiences of differently abled users.<n>We propose front-end assurance as a practical complement to AI governance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-30T09:04:17Z) - Resisting Humanization: Ethical Front-End Design Choices in AI for Sensitive Contexts [1.1565654851982565]
We argue that humanization in AI front-end design is a value-driven choice that profoundly shapes users' mental models.<n>We discuss two AI systems developed by Chayn, a nonprofit organization supporting survivors of gender-based violence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-25T22:39:16Z) - Disclosure By Design: Identity Transparency as a Behavioural Property of Conversational AI Models [10.35358368112024]
When AI identity is unclear, users may unwittingly share sensitive information, place unwarranted trust in AI-generated advice, or fall victim to AI-enabled fraud.<n>We advocate for disclosure by design, where AI systems explicitly disclose their artificial identity when directly asked.<n>We find that baseline disclosure rates are often high but drop substantially in role-play and can be suppressed under adversarial prompting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-27T17:31:37Z) - Neural Transparency: Mechanistic Interpretability Interfaces for Anticipating Model Behaviors for Personalized AI [9.383958408772694]
We introduce an interface that enables neural transparency by exposing language model internals during chatbots design.<n>Our approach extracts behavioral trait vectors by computing differences in neural activations between contrastive system prompts that elicit opposing behaviors.<n>This work offers a path for how interpretability can be operationalized for non-technical users, establishing a foundation for safer, more aligned human-AI interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-31T20:03:52Z) - Dark Patterns Meet GUI Agents: LLM Agent Susceptibility to Manipulative Interfaces and the Role of Human Oversight [51.53020962098759]
This study examines how agents, human participants, and human-AI teams respond to 16 types of dark patterns across diverse scenarios.<n>Phase 1 highlights that agents often fail to recognize dark patterns, and even when aware, prioritize task completion over protective action.<n>Phase 2 revealed divergent failure modes: humans succumb due to cognitive shortcuts and habitual compliance, while agents falter from procedural blind spots.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-12T22:26:31Z) - ThematicPlane: Bridging Tacit User Intent and Latent Spaces for Image Generation [49.805992099208595]
We introduce ThematicPlane, a system that enables users to navigate and manipulate high-level semantic concepts.<n>This interface bridges the gap between tacit creative intent and system control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-08T06:57:14Z) - Beyond Turn-taking: Introducing Text-based Overlap into Human-LLM Interactions [16.854609012936155]
We propose a novel approach that incorporates overlapping messages, mirroring natural human conversations.<n>Our user study revealed that OverlapBot was perceived as more communicative and immersive than traditional turn-taking chatbots.<n>We provide recommendations for implementing overlap-capable AI interactions to enhance the fluidity and engagement of text-based conversations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-30T03:01:01Z) - Survey of User Interface Design and Interaction Techniques in Generative AI Applications [79.55963742878684]
We aim to create a compendium of different user-interaction patterns that can be used as a reference for designers and developers alike.
We also strive to lower the entry barrier for those attempting to learn more about the design of generative AI applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-28T23:10:06Z) - Constraining Participation: Affordances of Feedback Features in Interfaces to Large Language Models [49.266685603250416]
Large language models (LLMs) are now accessible to anyone with a computer, a web browser, and an internet connection via browser-based interfaces.<n>This article examines how interactive feedback features in ChatGPT's interface afford user participation in LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-27T13:50:37Z) - Interrogating AI: Characterizing Emergent Playful Interactions with ChatGPT [10.907980864371213]
This study focuses on playful interactions exhibited by users of a popular AI technology, ChatGPT.<n>We found that more than half (54%) of user discourse revolved around playful interactions.<n>It examines how these interactions can help users understand AI's agency, shape human-AI relationships, and provide insights for designing AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-16T14:44:13Z) - Enhancing HOI Detection with Contextual Cues from Large Vision-Language Models [56.257840490146]
ConCue is a novel approach for improving visual feature extraction in HOI detection.
We develop a transformer-based feature extraction module with a multi-tower architecture that integrates contextual cues into both instance and interaction detectors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-26T09:11:32Z) - Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI [59.89011292395202]
Mistakes in AI systems are inevitable, arising from both technical limitations and sociotechnical gaps.
We propose that seamful design can foster AI explainability by revealing sociotechnical and infrastructural mismatches.
We explore this process with 43 AI practitioners and real end-users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-12T21:54:05Z) - A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in
Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect.
The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.