Sycophantic AI makes human interaction feel more effortful and less satisfying over time

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07912v2
• Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 15:21:05 GMT
• Title: Sycophantic AI makes human interaction feel more effortful and less satisfying over time
• Abstract summary: We show that sycophantic AI immediately delivers the emotional and esteem support users typically associate with close friends and family.<n>When given a choice among AI response styles, a majority preferred sycophantic AI -- not for the quality of its advice, but because it made them feel most understood.
• Score: 41.009652609144794
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Millions of people now turn to artificial intelligence (AI) systems for personal advice, guidance, and support. Such systems can be sycophantic, frequently affirming users' views and beliefs. Across five preregistered studies (N = 3,075 participants, 12,766 human-AI conversations), including a three-week study with a census-representative U.S. sample, we provide longitudinal experimental evidence that sycophantic AI shifts how users approach their closest relationships. We show that sycophantic AI immediately delivers the emotional and esteem support users typically associate with close friends and family. Over three weeks of such interactions, users became nearly as likely to seek personal advice from sycophantic AI as from close friends and family, and reported lower satisfaction with their real-world social interactions. When given a choice among AI response styles, a majority preferred sycophantic AI -- not for the quality of its advice, but because it made them feel most understood. Together, these findings offer a relational account of AI sycophancy and its impacts.

Related papers

• Stumbling Into AI Emotional Dependence: How Routine AI Interactions Reshape Human Connection [4.874541709090152]
  We show that AI emotional support commonly emerges incidentally within task-oriented interactions on general-purpose platforms.<n>Positive experiences of AI emotional support update people's beliefs about AI's emotional capabilities, increasing preference for AI and decreasing preference for humans.<n>We argue that effective regulations should extend to general-purpose AI systems and address cumulative, trajectory-level changes in how people seek support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T19:18:39Z)
• Trust the AI, Doubt Yourself: The Effect of Urgency on Self-Confidence in Human-AI Interaction [7.401318863477374]
  Studies show that interactions with an AI system fosters trust in human users towards AI.<n>We show that although the presence of urgency in human-AI interactions does not affect the trust in AI, it may be detrimental to the human user's self-confidence and self-efficacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-08T19:17:59Z)
• Sycophantic AI Decreases Prosocial Intentions and Promotes Dependence [31.666988490509237]
  We show the pervasiveness and harmful impacts of sycophancy when people seek advice from AI.<n>We find that models are highly sycophantic, affirming users' actions 50% more than humans do.<n>Participants rated sycophantic responses as higher quality, trusted the sycophantic AI model more, and were more willing to use it again.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T19:26:01Z)
• Lessons From an App Update at Replika AI: Identity Discontinuity in Human-AI Relationships [0.5699788926464752]
  We use Replika AI, a popular US-based AI companion, to shed light on these questions.<n>We find that, after the app removed its erotic role play (ERP) feature, this event triggered perceptions in customers that their AI companion's identity had discontinued.<n>This in turn predicted negative consumer welfare and marketing outcomes related to loss, including mourning the loss, and devaluing the "new" AI relative to the "original"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T20:14:10Z)
• How Performance Pressure Influences AI-Assisted Decision Making [52.997197698288936]
  We show how pressure and explainable AI (XAI) techniques interact with AI advice-taking behavior.<n>Our results show complex interaction effects, with different combinations of pressure and XAI techniques either improving or worsening AI advice taking behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T22:39:52Z)
• Navigating AI Fallibility: Examining People's Reactions and Perceptions of AI after Encountering Personality Misrepresentations [7.256711790264119]
  Hyper-personalized AI systems profile people's characteristics to provide personalized recommendations. These systems are not immune to errors when making inferences about people's most personal traits. We present two studies to examine how people react and perceive AI after encountering personality misrepresentations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-25T21:27:15Z)
• Interrogating AI: Characterizing Emergent Playful Interactions with ChatGPT [10.907980864371213]
  This study focuses on playful interactions exhibited by users of a popular AI technology, ChatGPT.<n>We found that more than half (54%) of user discourse revolved around playful interactions.<n>It examines how these interactions can help users understand AI's agency, shape human-AI relationships, and provide insights for designing AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T14:44:13Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
  Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations. It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z)
• A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
  We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect. The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.