Understanding Asynchronous Inference Methods for Vision-Language-Action Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08168v1
• Date: Mon, 04 May 2026 18:01:15 GMT
• Title: Understanding Asynchronous Inference Methods for Vision-Language-Action Models
• Abstract summary: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models offer a promising path to generalist robot control, but their inference latency causes observation staleness when generated actions are executed asynchronously.<n>Several methods have been proposed concurrently to mitigate this problem: inference-time inpainting (IT-RTC), training-time delay simulation (TT-RTC), future-state-aware conditioning (VLASH), and lightweight residual correction (A2C2)<n>We present a systematic comparison of these four methods under controlled conditions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models offer a promising path to generalist robot control, but their inference latency causes observation staleness when generated actions are executed asynchronously. Several methods have been proposed concurrently to mitigate this problem: inference-time inpainting (IT-RTC), training-time delay simulation (TT-RTC), future-state-aware conditioning (VLASH), and lightweight residual correction (A2C2). Each takes a fundamentally different approach, but they have so far been evaluated independently with different codebases, base policies, and protocols. We present a systematic comparison of these four methods under controlled conditions. We develop two unified codebases that integrate all methods with harmonized library and dataset versions, and we benchmark them on the Kinetix suite with MLPMixer policies and on the LIBERO manipulation benchmark with SmolVLA, sweeping inference delays up to $d=20$ control steps. A2C2's per-step residual correction is the most effective method on Kinetix, holding above 90% solve rate up to $d=8$, and also leads on LIBERO from $d=4$ onwards. IT-RTC is competitive at low delays but degrades sharply under long chunks ($H=30$) and high delays. TT-RTC is the most robust training-based method: stable across $d_\max$ choices, generalizes beyond its training delay distribution, and adds zero inference overhead. VLASH exhibits a clear low-delay vs. high-delay trade-off governed by the fine-tuning delay range $[0,d_\max]$. Code is available at https://github.com/TheAyos/async-vla-inference

Related papers

• REFACTOR-VLA: Unsupervised Library Learning of Typed Motor Programs [0.0]
  Most vision-language-action (VLA) models are monolithic.<n>We introduce REFACTOR-VLA, a wake/sleepmodel system for learning reusable skills.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-01T13:19:05Z)
• PhAIL: A Real-Robot VLA Benchmark and Distributional Methodology [0.0]
  Real-world evaluation of vision-language-action (VLA) policies still rests on binary success rate at a fixed timeout with $N le 25$ rollouts per condition.<n>We introduce PhAIL, an open real-robot benchmark on a Franka FR3 (dataset, per-rollout artifacts, and end-to-end reference implementation) of a distributional evaluation methodology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T10:10:19Z)
• Scaling Laws for Agent Harnesses via Effective Feedback Compute [53.68149869349268]
  emphEffective Feedback Compute (EFC) is a trace-level scaling coordinate that credits feedback only when it is informative, valid, non-redundant, and retained for subsequent decisions.<n>EFC-based coordinates consistently predict failure rates better than raw-compute baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T09:45:47Z)
• INC: An Indirect Neural Corrector for Auto-Regressive Hybrid PDE Solvers [61.84396402100827]
  We propose the Indirect Neural Corrector ($mathrmINC$), which integrates learned corrections into the governing equations.<n>$mathrmINC$ reduces the error amplification on the order of $t-1 + L$, where $t$ is the timestep and $L$ the Lipschitz constant.<n>We test $mathrmINC$ in extensive benchmarks, covering numerous differentiable solvers, neural backbones, and test cases ranging from a 1D chaotic system to 3D turbulence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-16T20:14:28Z)
• A Quadratic Synchronization Rule for Distributed Deep Learning [66.68264684667562]
  This work proposes a theory-grounded method for determining $H$, named the Quadratic Synchronization Rule (QSR) Experiments on ResNet and ViT show that local gradient methods with QSR consistently improve the test accuracy over other synchronization strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-22T21:38:57Z)
• Sharper Convergence Guarantees for Asynchronous SGD for Distributed and Federated Learning [77.22019100456595]
  We show a training algorithm for distributed computation workers with varying communication frequency. In this work, we obtain a tighter convergence rate of $mathcalO!!!(sigma2-2_avg!! . We also show that the heterogeneity term in rate is affected by the average delay within each worker.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T17:10:57Z)
• Asynchronous Stochastic Optimization Robust to Arbitrary Delays [54.61797739710608]
  We consider optimization with delayed gradients where, at each time stept$, the algorithm makes an update using a stale computation - d_t$ for arbitrary delay $d_t gradient. Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy and robustness of our algorithm in cases where the delay distribution is skewed or heavy-tailed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-22T15:50:45Z)
• Acting in Delayed Environments with Non-Stationary Markov Policies [57.52103323209643]
  We introduce a framework for learning and planning in MDPs where the decision-maker commits actions that are executed with a delay of $m$ steps. We prove that with execution delay, deterministic Markov policies in the original state-space are sufficient for attaining maximal reward, but need to be non-stationary. We devise a non-stationary Q-learning style model-based algorithm that solves delayed execution tasks without resorting to state-augmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-28T13:35:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.