AI Native Asset Intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09115v2
• Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 17:44:26 GMT
• Title: AI Native Asset Intelligence
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces AI-native asset intelligence, a framework that transforms heterogeneous security data into a structured intelligence layer for consistent, contextual, and proactive asset-level reasoning.<n>The framework combines a modeling layer, representing assets, identities, relationships, controls, attack vectors, and blast-radius patterns, with a scoring layer that converts fragmented signals into a normalized measure of asset importance.
• Score: 0.39583175274885346
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Modern security environments generate fragmented signals across cloud resources, identities, configurations, and third-party security tools. Although AI-native security assistants improve access to this data, they remain largely reactive: users must ask the right questions and interpret disconnected findings. This does not scale in enterprise environments, where signal importance depends on exposure, exploitability, dependencies, and business context. Repeated AI queries may therefore produce unstable prioritization without a structured basis for comparing assets. This paper introduces AI-native asset intelligence, a framework that transforms heterogeneous security data into a structured intelligence layer for consistent, contextual, and proactive asset-level reasoning. The framework combines a modeling layer, representing assets, identities, relationships, controls, attack vectors, and blast-radius patterns, with a scoring layer that converts fragmented signals into a normalized measure of asset importance. The scoring system separates intrinsic exposure, based on misconfigurations and attack-vector evidence, from contextual importance, based on anomaly, blast radius, business criticality, and data criticality. AI contextualization refines severity and business/data classifications, while deterministic aggregation preserves consistency. We evaluate the scoring system on a production snapshot with 131,625 resources across 15 vendors and 178 asset types. Sensitivity analyses and ablations show that severity mappings control finding sensitivity, AI severity adjustment refines prioritization, attack-vector scoring responds to rare exploitability evidence, and contextual modulation selectively modifies exposed resources based on business or data importance. The results support AI-native asset intelligence as a foundation for stable prioritization and proactive security-posture reasoning.

Related papers

• From Knowing to Acting: Benchmarking Self-Awareness Capability of LLM Agents [69.07911499189129]
  We introduce KAPRO, a framework that evaluates cognitive-behavioral alignment by decoupling an agent's metacognitive judgment (Knowing) from its spontaneous execution (Acting)<n>Experiments show that self-awareness capability is strongly correlated with task success but degrades sharply in internal-capability settings.<n> proprietary and reasoning-oriented models demonstrate more reliable cognitive gating.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-09T17:17:08Z)
• CyberMaskQA: A Privacy-Aware Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Cybersecurity Question Answering [8.946002046630845]
  CYBERMASKQA is a privacy-aware QA benchmark covering key security domains.<n> Generated through a systematic pipeline, the dataset combines human-curated base scenarios with LLM-driven semantic expansion.<n> Evaluations of QA accuracy and masking performance demonstrate the benchmark's utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-23T22:57:13Z)
• Position: Safety and Fairness in Agentic AI Depend on Interaction Topology, Not on Model Scale or Alignment [1.8124703841795666]
  In agentic AI, safety is determined by interaction topology, not model weights.<n> scaling to more capable models strengthens these effects by increasing consensus formation.<n>We argue that agentic AI must be treated as a dynamical system rather than a collection of aligned components.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-01T22:49:10Z)
• FSFM: A Biologically-Inspired Framework for Selective Forgetting of Agent Memory [11.729108742234416]
  In resource-constrained environments, a well-designed forgetting mechanism is as crucial as remembering, delivering benefits across three dimensions.<n>Our framework establishes a taxonomy of forgetting mechanisms: passive decay-based, active deletion-based, safety-triggered, and adaptive reinforcement-based.<n>Results show significant improvements: access efficiency (+8.49%), content quality (+29.2% signal-to-noise ratio), and security performance (100% elimination of security risks)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-22T07:55:22Z)
• Dynamic analysis enhances issue resolution [53.50448142467294]
  DAIRA (Dynamic Analysis-enhanced Issue Resolution Agent) is an automated repair framework that embeds dynamic analysis into the agent's reasoning cycle.<n> Driven by a Test Tracing-Driven methodology, DAIRA utilizes lightweight monitors to extract critical runtime data.<n>When powered by Gemini 3 Flash Preview, DAIRA establishes a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance, achieving a 79.4% resolution rate on the SWE-bench Verified dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T14:48:54Z)
• Lost in the Noise: How Reasoning Models Fail with Contextual Distractors [57.31788955167306]
  Recent advances in reasoning models and agentic AI systems have led to an increased reliance on diverse external information.<n>We introduce NoisyBench, a comprehensive benchmark that systematically evaluates model robustness across 11 datasets in RAG, reasoning, alignment, and tool-use tasks.<n>Our evaluation reveals a catastrophic performance drop of up to 80% in state-of-the-art models when faced with contextual distractors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T05:43:51Z)
• Graph Neural Network Based Adaptive Threat Detection for Cloud Identity and Access Management Logs [0.0]
  This paper presents a Graph Neural Network Based Adaptive Threat Detection framework.<n>It learns latent user resource interaction patterns from IAM audit trails in real time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-11T04:44:02Z)
• Information Retrieval Induced Safety Degradation in AI Agents [52.15553901577888]
  This study investigates how expanding retrieval access affects model reliability, bias propagation, and harmful content generation.<n>Retrieval-enabled agents built on aligned LLMs often behave more unsafely than uncensored models without retrieval.<n>These findings underscore the need for robust mitigation strategies to ensure fairness and reliability in retrieval-enabled and increasingly autonomous AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T11:21:40Z)
• VulRG: Multi-Level Explainable Vulnerability Patch Ranking for Complex Systems Using Graphs [20.407534993667607]
  This work introduces a graph-based framework for vulnerability patch prioritization.<n>It integrates diverse data sources and metrics into a universally applicable model.<n> refined risk metrics enable detailed assessments at the component, asset, and system levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T14:21:52Z)
• Model Stealing Attack against Graph Classification with Authenticity, Uncertainty and Diversity [80.16488817177182]
  GNNs are vulnerable to the model stealing attack, a nefarious endeavor geared towards duplicating the target model via query permissions. We introduce three model stealing attacks to adapt to different actual scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T05:42:31Z)
• On the Robustness of Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis: Rethinking Model, Data, and Training [109.9218185711916]
  Aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) aims at automatically inferring the specific sentiment polarities toward certain aspects of products or services behind social media texts or reviews. We propose to enhance the ABSA robustness by systematically rethinking the bottlenecks from all possible angles, including model, data, and training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T11:07:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.