Key Coverage Matters: Semi-Structured Extraction of OCR Clinical Reports

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09440v1
• Date: Sun, 10 May 2026 09:29:33 GMT
• Title: Key Coverage Matters: Semi-Structured Extraction of OCR Clinical Reports
• Abstract summary: Clinical reports are often fragmented across healthcare institutions because privacy regulations and data silos limit direct information sharing.<n>We formulate this problem as canonical key-conditioned extractive question answering over OCR-derived clinical reports.<n>Using a 0.2B BERT-based model, experiments on real-world reports from more than 20 hospitals show performance improves monotonically with key coverage.
• Score: 5.2232051743738905
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Clinical reports are often fragmented across healthcare institutions because privacy regulations and data silos limit direct information sharing. When patients seek care at a different hospital, they often carry paper or scanned reports from prior visits. This hinders EHR integration and longitudinal review, and downstream applications that depend on more complete patient records, such as patient management, follow-up care, real-world studies, and clinical-trial matching. Although OCR can digitize such reports, reliable extraction remains challenging because clinical documents are heterogeneous, OCR text is noisy, and many healthcare settings require low-cost on-premise deployment. We formulate this problem as canonical key-conditioned extractive question answering over OCR-derived clinical reports. Because the key fields are neither fixed nor known in advance, the key space is open. We maintain a canonical key inventory through iterative key mining, normalization, clustering, and lightweight human verification, and introduce key coverage as a metric to quantify inventory completeness. Using a 0.2B BERT-based model, experiments on real-world reports from more than 20 hospitals show performance improves monotonically with key coverage. The model achieves F1 scores of 0.839 and 0.893 under exact match and boundary-tolerant matching, respectively, once the Top-90 canonical keys are covered. These results show that key coverage is a dominant factor for end-to-end performance. At Top-90 coverage, our model outperforms a fine-tuned Qwen3-0.6B baseline under exact match. Although our annotated corpus is Chinese, the method relies on the language-agnostic key-value organization of semi-structured clinical reports and can be adapted to other settings given an appropriate canonical key inventory and alias mapping.

Related papers

• CARDEA: Auditable Reasoning Grounded in Spatial Evidence for End-to-End Coronary Angiography Interpretation [0.0]
  Existing AI systems can improve consistency but lack auditable decision processes.<n>We developed CARDEA, a unified large vision-language model that serves as the inference core of a CAG pipeline.<n> CARDEA runs an end-to-end CAG pipeline from raw multiview videos through selection to study-level diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-07T02:01:27Z)
• Clinical Term Extraction using Open-Source Small Language Models [2.5316486726943843]
  Open-source small language models were evaluated for ALS-relevant clinical terms in patient documentation.<n>We compared 26 open-source models using aggregate, label-level, and manual-validation multilabel classification metrics.<n>These findings support targeted hybrid extraction rather than replacement of existing rule-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-19T18:59:33Z)
• Beyond Scalar Scores: Exploring LLM-based Metrics for Clinical Significance Evaluation in Radiology Reports [49.5225801722164]
  Existing metrics obscure this requirement by reducing report quality to a medically ungrounded scalar.<n>We study this boundary using ReEvalMed benchmark as testbed and evaluate metric-level clinical significance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T08:10:30Z)
• MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports [2.289837306672451]
  We present MedStruct-S, a benchmark specifically designed to evaluate tasks under unknown keys and OCR noise.<n>Our results show that encoder-only models achieve the best performance for non-null-value key-conditioned QA.<n>These findings show that the benchmark provides a reliable and practical basis for selecting and comparing models across different semi-structured IE settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-04T19:37:21Z)
• CT-FineBench: A Diagnostic Fidelity Benchmark for Fine-Grained Evaluation of CT Report Generation [51.11942945171396]
  Conventional evaluation metrics offer only coarse measures of lexical overlap or entity matching.<n>We propose CT-FineBench, a benchmark built from CT-RATE and Merlin to evaluate the fine-grained factual consistency of CT reports.<n>Our benchmark is constructed through a meticulous, Question-Answering (QA) based process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-27T03:32:46Z)
• How Robust Are Large Language Models for Clinical Numeracy? An Empirical Study on Numerical Reasoning Abilities in Clinical Contexts [11.740513556909542]
  ClinicNumRobBench is a benchmark of 1,624 context-question instances with ground-truth answers.<n>It evaluates four main types of clinical numeracy: value retrieval, arithmetic computation, relational comparison, and aggregation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T07:44:41Z)
• Longitudinal Vestibular Schwannoma Dataset with Consensus-based Human-in-the-loop Annotations [3.1898695141875772]
  This dataset includes 190 patients, with tumour annotations available for 534 longitudinal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1CE) scans from 184 patients, and non-annotated T2-weighted scans from 6 patients.<n>We show that our approach enables effective and resource-efficient generalisation of automated segmentation models to a target data distribution.<n>It is estimated to enhance efficiency by approximately 37.4% compared to the conventional manual annotation process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-01T09:53:28Z)
• A systematic review of trial-matching pipelines using large language models [0.9176056742068814]
  Matching patients to clinical trial options is critical for identifying novel treatments, especially in oncology.<n>Large language models (LLMs) offer a promising solution to this problem.<n>This review synthesizes progress in applying LLMs to clinical trial matching, highlighting promising directions and key limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-13T21:21:05Z)
• Decoupling Clinical and Class-Agnostic Features for Reliable Few-Shot Adaptation under Shift [12.373281238541296]
  Medical vision-language models (VLMs) offer promise for clinical decision support, yet their reliability under distribution shifts remains a major concern for safe deployment.<n>We propose DRiFt, a structured feature decoupling framework that explicitly separates clinically relevant signals from task-agnostic noise.<n>Our approach improves in-distribution performance by +11.4% Top-1 accuracy and +3.3% Macro-F1 over prior prompt-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T12:26:57Z)
• Attribute Structuring Improves LLM-Based Evaluation of Clinical Text Summaries [56.31117605097345]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to generate accurate clinical text summaries, but still struggle with issues regarding grounding and evaluation.<n>Here, we explore a general mitigation framework using Attribute Structuring (AS), which structures the summary evaluation process.<n>AS consistently improves the correspondence between human annotations and automated metrics in clinical text summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-01T21:59:03Z)
• Improving Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation Across Clinical Sites: A Federated Learning Approach with Noise-Resilient Training [75.40980802817349]
  Deep learning models have shown promise for automatically segmenting MS lesions, but the scarcity of accurately annotated data hinders progress in this area. We introduce a Decoupled Hard Label Correction (DHLC) strategy that considers the imbalanced distribution and fuzzy boundaries of MS lesions. We also introduce a Centrally Enhanced Label Correction (CELC) strategy, which leverages the aggregated central model as a correction teacher for all sites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T00:36:10Z)
• Few-Shot Cross-lingual Transfer for Coarse-grained De-identification of Code-Mixed Clinical Texts [56.72488923420374]
  Pre-trained language models (LMs) have shown great potential for cross-lingual transfer in low-resource settings. We show the few-shot cross-lingual transfer property of LMs for named recognition (NER) and apply it to solve a low-resource and real-world challenge of code-mixed (Spanish-Catalan) clinical notes de-identification in the stroke.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-10T21:46:52Z)
• COMPOSE: Cross-Modal Pseudo-Siamese Network for Patient Trial Matching [70.08786840301435]
  We propose CrOss-Modal PseudO-SiamEse network (COMPOSE) to address these challenges for patient-trial matching. Experiment results show COMPOSE can reach 98.0% AUC on patient-criteria matching and 83.7% accuracy on patient-trial matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T21:01:33Z)
• DeepEnroll: Patient-Trial Matching with Deep Embedding and Entailment Prediction [67.91606509226132]
  Clinical trials are essential for drug development but often suffer from expensive, inaccurate and insufficient patient recruitment. DeepEnroll is a cross-modal inference learning model to jointly encode enrollment criteria (tabular data) into a shared latent space for matching inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-22T17:51:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.