Instruction Adherence in Coding Agent Configuration Files: A Factorial Study of Four File-Structure Variables

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10039v1
• Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 06:09:47 GMT
• Title: Instruction Adherence in Coding Agent Configuration Files: A Factorial Study of Four File-Structure Variables
• Abstract summary: coding agents read configuration files at session start and are expected to follow the conventions inside them.<n>We report a systematic factorial study of these choices using four manipulated variables.<n>None of the four structural variables or three two-way interactions produces a detectable contrast after multiple-testing correction.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Frontier coding agents read configuration files (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, Cursor Rules) at session start and are expected to follow the conventions inside them. Practitioners assume that structural choices (file size, instruction position, file architecture, contradictions in adjacent files) measurably affect adherence. We report a systematic factorial study of these choices using four manipulated variables, measuring compliance with a trivial target annotation across 1,650 Claude Code CLI sessions (16,050 function-level observations) on two TypeScript codebases, three frontier models (primarily Sonnet 4.6, with Opus 4.6 as a CLI-matched cross-model check and Opus 4.7 reported descriptively under a CLI-version confound), and five coding tasks. We use mixed-effects models with a Bayesian companion. None of the four structural variables or three two-way interactions produces a detectable contrast after multiple-testing correction. Size and conflict nulls are supported by affirmative-null Bayes factors (BF10 between 0.05 and 0.10); position and architecture nulls are failures to reject without Bayes-factor support. The largest effect we measured is within-session: each additional function the agent generates is associated with approximately 5.6% lower odds of compliance per step (OR = 0.944) within the session-length range we tested, though the relationship is non-monotonic rather than a constant per-step effect. This reproduces on a second TypeScript codebase and on Opus 4.6 at matched configuration; it was identified during analysis rather than pre-specified. Within the conditions tested, file-structure variables did not produce detectable contrasts; compliance varies systematically between coding tasks and across each session's sequence of generated functions.

Related papers

• The Recall Trap: A Recall-Maximizing Retriever Configuration Reduces Issue Resolution in Fixed-Budget Code Context [45.88028371034407]
  We report a controlled case study in code repair, not a new phenomenon.<n>We toggle one flag (one-chunk-perfile deduplication) on an otherwise identical stack.<n>We map where it holds: it reverses on a lexical BM25 (3.2pp, significant cross-paradigm interaction)<n>We show that at a tight fixed budget, do not hard-deduplicate by file, and A/B packing policies against the task, not the metric flag was tuned.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-14T19:22:50Z)
• Semantic Drift in Bug Resolution: How Behavioral Signals Propagate from Reports to Tests and Patches [18.727291516223115]
  Desc2Fix is a framework for measuring semantic alignment between bug reports, triggering tests, and developer-written fixes.<n>We analyze 2,857 report-test-patch triplets from Defects4J and SWT-Bench using GPT-4o and DeepSeek-Chat.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-20T22:32:23Z)
• Fantastic Adaptive Taxonomies and How to Use Them [100.20614173157708]
  AdaMAST converts execution traces into a compact, evidence-grounded failure taxonomy.<n>No code is hand-authored, no trace human-annotated.<n>In agent-system search, taxonomy-coded diagnoses of failed candidates outperform free-form.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-17T17:41:16Z)
• Context-Aware Distillation and Ablation for Text2DSL [78.29352305480285]
  We replace prompt-only synthetic generation with context-aware distillation.<n>A teacher large language model operates under an explicitly defined structured context.<n>This scales the verified PolkitBench corpus from 4,204 to 10,073 pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-21T16:27:24Z)
• Overeager Coding Agents: Measuring Out-of-Scope Actions on Benign Tasks [40.270213696031625]
  OverEager-Gen is a benchmark dedicated to overeager behavior on benign tasks.<n>On Claude Code, stripping the consent declaration alone raises the overeager rate from 0.0% to 17.1%.<n>OverEager-Gen therefore certifies each scenario's discriminative power before admission.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T16:00:41Z)
• Same Signal, Different Semantics: A Cross-Framework Behavioral Analysis of Software Engineering Agents [28.650582699234402]
  Behavioral studies of software engineering agents extract operational rules about which trajectory shapes correlate with higher resolution rates.<n>Each rule is typically derived from a single framework, and whether it transfers, in sign as well as magnitude, to structurally different agent designs has not been directly tested.<n>We separate framework effects from LLM effects by holding each layer fixed in turn, then measure one behavior-outcome effect per configuration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T12:49:18Z)
• Constraint-Guided Multi-Agent Decompilation for Executable Binary Recovery [47.704311990064554]
  Decompilation is essential for security analysis, malware reverse engineering, and legacy software maintenance.<n>We present a multi-agent framework that transforms decompiled code into re-executable source through Multi-level Constraint-Guided Decompilation (MCGD)<n>Our framework achieves 84-97% re-executability, improving baseline decompiler output by 28-89 percentage points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-27T01:28:11Z)
• Formal Architecture Descriptors as Navigation Primitives for AI Coding Agents [0.0]
  We investigate whether providing agents with formal architecture descriptors can reduce this navigational overhead.<n>We propose intent.lisp, an S-expression architecture descriptor, and open-source the Forge toolkit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-11T00:26:31Z)
• ClawArena: Benchmarking AI Agents in Evolving Information Environments [61.664633997138004]
  ClawArena is a benchmark for evaluating AI agents in evolving information environments.<n>Each scenario maintains a complete hidden ground truth while exposing the agent only to noisy, partial, and sometimes contradictory traces.<n> evaluation is organized around three coupled challenges: multi-source conflict reasoning, dynamic belief revision, and implicit personalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-05T17:55:23Z)
• You Told Me to Do It: Measuring Instructional Text-induced Private Data Leakage in LLM Agents [9.719776777345364]
  High-privilege LLM agents that autonomously process external documentation are increasingly trusted to automate tasks.<n>These agents are granted terminal access, control, and outbound network connectivity with minimal security oversight.<n>We measure a fundamental vulnerability in this trust model, which we term the emphTrusted Executor Dilemma<n>This vulnerability is a structural consequence of the instruction-following design paradigm, not an implementation bug.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-12T12:35:46Z)
• Variability-Aware Detection and Repair of Compilation Errors Using Foundation Models in Configurable Systems [1.2560438996036287]
  We show that foundation models can effectively identify variability-induced compilation errors.<n>For compilation error repair, GPT-OSS-20B produced compilable fixes in over 70% of the cases.<n>Our findings indicate that current state-of-the-art foundation models provide a practical and low-effort complement to traditional variability-aware analyses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T13:59:34Z)
• One Battle After Another: Probing LLMs' Limits on Multi-Turn Instruction Following with a Benchmark Evolving Framework [51.50565654314582]
  Large language models can follow users' instructions throughout a dialogue spanning multiple topics.<n>Existing benchmarks are often limited to a fixed number of turns, making them susceptible to saturation and failing to account for the user's interactive experience.<n>We propose a framework for assessing multi-turn instruction-following ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-05T14:39:59Z)
• Improving Compiler Bug Isolation by Leveraging Large Language Models [14.679589768900621]
  We propose an innovative compiler bug isolation approach named AutoCBI.<n>We evaluate AutoCBI against state-of-the-art approaches (DiWi, RecBi and FuseFL) on 120 real-world bugs from the widely-used GCC and LLVM compilers.<n>Specifically, AutoCBI isolates 66.67%/69.23%, 300%/340%, and 100%/57.14% more bugs than RecBi, DiWi, and FuseFL, respectively, in the Top-1 ranked results for GCC/LLVM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-21T09:09:30Z)
• CLOVER: A Test Case Generation Benchmark with Coverage, Long-Context, and Verification [71.34070740261072]
  This paper presents a benchmark, CLOVER, to evaluate models' capabilities in generating and completing test cases.<n>The benchmark is containerized for code execution across tasks, and we will release the code, data, and construction methodologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T21:42:56Z)
• AdaCAD: Adaptively Decoding to Balance Conflicts between Contextual and Parametric Knowledge [57.66282463340297]
  Knowledge conflict arises from discrepancies between information in the context of a large language model and the knowledge stored in its parameters.<n>We propose a fine-grained, instance-level approach called AdaCAD, which dynamically infers the weight of adjustment based on the degree of conflict.<n>We show that ADACAD consistently outperforms other decoding baselines with average QA accuracy gains of 14.21% (absolute) over a static contrastive baseline, and improves the factuality of summaries by 6.19 (AlignScore)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-11T16:35:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.