Verification Mirage: Mapping the Reliability Boundary of Self-Verification in Medical VQA

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10850v1
• Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 17:00:00 GMT
• Title: Verification Mirage: Mapping the Reliability Boundary of Self-Verification in Medical VQA
• Abstract summary: Self-verification is increasingly used as a default safety layer for medical visual question answering.<n>We introduce [METHOD NAME], a diagnostic framework for mapping the reliability boundary of medical VLM self-verification.
• Score: 36.64345996280624
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Self-verification, re-invoking the same vision language model (VLM) in a fresh context to check its own generated answer, is increasingly used as a default safety layer for medical visual question answering (VQA). We argue that this practice is fundamentally unreliable. We introduce [METHOD NAME], a diagnostic framework for mapping the reliability boundary of medical VLM self-verification by decomposing verifier behavior into discrimination capability and agreement bias. Because the verifier and answer generator are capacity-coupled, the verifier can overly agree with the generator, creating a verification mirage: a regime with both high verifier error and high agreement bias, driven by false acceptance of incorrect answers. Evaluating six open-weight VLMs across five medical VQA datasets and seven medical tasks, we find that this boundary is strongly task-conditioned. Knowledge-intensive clinical tasks fall deepest into the mirage, simpler tasks are more resistant, and perceptual tasks lie in between. Verification also fails to provide an independent safety signal: logistic mixed-effects analysis shows that verifier error and agreement bias become more likely when the generator is wrong, while saliency analyses show that verifiers under-attend to image evidence relative to generators, a phenomenon we call the lazy verifier. Cross-verification reduces but does not eliminate the mirage. Moreover, when verification is reused in multi-turn actor-verifier loops, most initially wrong answers become locked in by false verification. Since our experiments use clean benchmarks, the observed reliability boundary likely underestimates failures in real clinical deployment.

Related papers

• EVADE: Evidence-Verified Agentic Diagnosis with Escape [0.880899367147235]
  EVADE is an inferential, non-training method that enhances the safety of deploying a single frozen VLM.<n>It commits only when both the entire image and the zoomed view responses agree.<n>It reduces expected calibration error (ECE) by up to 45% compared to zero-shot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-19T11:51:24Z)
• Task-Conditional Faithfulness Auditing of Multimodal LLMs for Grid Diagnosis [5.427346259545067]
  Multimodal large language models (LLMs) can combine topology, measurements, and incident text for grid diagnosis.<n>This letter proposes a general framework in order to conduct task-conditional faithfulness audit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-27T15:17:15Z)
• Detecting Is Not Resolving: The Monitoring Control Gap in Retrieval Augmented LLMs [20.59321114618083]
  We show that single-turn diagnostics systematically overestimate RAG safety, that contradiction is uncorrelated with safe resolution, and that no universal prompt fix exists.<n>The gap between what models recognize and what they do must be measured and closed before retrieval-augmented systems can be trusted in high-stakes settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-26T15:18:43Z)
• The Hidden Signal of Verifier Strictness: Controlling and Improving Step-Wise Verification via Selective Latent Steering [67.8271652641864]
  We study whether verifier strictness can be controlled through hidden-state intervention.<n>VerifySteer exploits latent correctness signals for sample-level routing and selectively intervenes on paragraph boundaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T05:48:16Z)
• AIVV: Neuro-Symbolic LLM Agent-Integrated Verification and Validation for Trustworthy Autonomous Systems [6.586256098975453]
  Agent-Integrated Verification and Validation (AIVV) is a hybrid framework that deploys Large Language Models (LLMs) as a deliberative outer loop.<n>The council agents perform collaborative validation by semantically validating nuisance and true failures.<n> Experiments on a time-series simulator for Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) demonstrate that AIVV successfully digitizes the HITL V&V process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T19:25:18Z)
• MedObvious: Exposing the Medical Moravec's Paradox in VLMs via Clinical Triage [20.835664121303534]
  Vision Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly used for tasks like medical report generation and visual question answering.<n>In clinical practice, interpretation begins with pre-diagnostic sanity checks.<n>Existing benchmarks largely assume this step is solved, and therefore miss a critical failure mode.<n>We introduce MedObvious, a 1,880-task benchmark that isolates input validation as a set-level consistency capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-24T17:59:54Z)
• Grounding the Score: Explicit Visual Premise Verification for Reliable Vision-Language Process Reward Models [8.630726904040781]
  Explicit Visual Premise Verification (EVPV) is a lightweight verification interface that conditions step scoring on the reliability of the visual premises a step depends on.<n>EVPV improves step-level verification and consistently boosts Best-of-N reranking accuracy over strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T08:40:26Z)
• Guideline-Grounded Evidence Accumulation for High-Stakes Agent Verification [60.18369393468405]
  Existing verifiers usually underperform owing to a lack of domain knowledge and limited calibration.<n>GLEAN compiles expert-curated protocols into trajectory-informed, well-calibrated correctness signals.<n>We empirically validate GLEAN with agentic clinical diagnosis across three diseases from the MIMIC-IV dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T09:36:43Z)
• V-Loop: Visual Logical Loop Verification for Hallucination Detection in Medical Visual Question Answering [8.994256499686863]
  We propose a training-free and plug-and-play framework for hallucination detection in medical visual question answering.<n>V-Loop forms a visually grounded logical loop to verify factual correctness.<n>It consistently outperforms existing introspective methods, remains highly efficient, and further boosts uncertainty-based approaches when used in combination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-26T07:46:41Z)
• VulAgent: Hypothesis-Validation based Multi-Agent Vulnerability Detection [55.957275374847484]
  VulAgent is a multi-agent vulnerability detection framework based on hypothesis validation.<n>It implements a semantics-sensitive, multi-view detection pipeline, each aligned to a specific analysis perspective.<n>On average, VulAgent improves overall accuracy by 6.6%, increases the correct identification rate of vulnerable--fixed code pairs by up to 450%, and reduces the false positive rate by about 36%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-15T02:25:38Z)
• SURE-Med: Systematic Uncertainty Reduction for Enhanced Reliability in Medical Report Generation [2.2185034594788164]
  We propose SURE-Med, a unified framework that systematically reduces uncertainty across three critical dimensions: visual, distributional, and contextual.<n>To mitigate visual uncertainty, a Frontal-Aware View Repair Resampling module corrects view annotation errors and adaptively selects informative features from supplementary views.<n>To tackle label distribution uncertainty, we introduce a Token Sensitive Learning objective that enhances the modeling of critical diagnostic sentences.<n>To reduce contextual uncertainty, our Contextual Evidence Filter validates and selectively incorporates prior information that aligns with the current image, effectively suppressing hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-03T09:52:30Z)
• Faithfulness-Aware Uncertainty Quantification for Fact-Checking the Output of Retrieval Augmented Generation [108.13261761812517]
  We introduce FRANQ (Faithfulness-based Retrieval Augmented UNcertainty Quantification), a novel method for hallucination detection in RAG outputs.<n>We present a new long-form Question Answering (QA) dataset annotated for both factuality and faithfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T11:56:59Z)
• TrustLoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation for Failure Detection under Out-of-distribution Data [62.22804234013273]
  We propose a simple failure detection framework to unify and facilitate classification with rejection under both covariate and semantic shifts.<n>Our key insight is that by separating and consolidating failure-specific reliability knowledge with low-rank adapters, we can enhance the failure detection ability effectively and flexibly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-20T09:20:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.