Neural at ArchEHR-QA 2026: One Method Fits All: Unified Prompt Optimization for Clinical QA over EHRs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10877v1
- Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 17:27:30 GMT
- Title: Neural at ArchEHR-QA 2026: One Method Fits All: Unified Prompt Optimization for Clinical QA over EHRs
- Abstract summary: We present our method for the ArchEHR-QA 2026 shared task at CL4Health@LREC 2026.<n>Our approach decouples the task into independent, modular stages and employs DSPy"s MIPROv21.5 to automatically discover high-performing prompts.
- Score: 2.7732306355664753
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Automated question answering (QA) over electronic health records (EHRs) demands precise evidence retrieval, faithful answer generation, and explicit grounding of answers in clinical notes. In this work, we present Neural1.5, our method for the ArchEHR-QA 2026 shared task at CL4Health@LREC 2026, which comprises four subtasks: question interpretation, evidence identification, answer generation, and evidence alignment. Our approach decouples the task into independent, modular stages and employs DSPy"s MIPROv2 optimizer to automatically discover high-performing prompts, jointly tuning instructions and few-shot demonstrations for each stage. Within every stage, self-consistency voting over multiple stochastic inference runs suppresses spurious errors and improves reliability, while stage-specific verification mechanisms (e.g., self-reflection and chain-of-verification for alignment) further refine output quality. Among all teams that participated in all four subtasks, our method ranks second overall (mean rank 4.00), placing 4th, 1st, 4th, and 7th on Subtasks 1-4, respectively. These results demonstrate that systematic, per-stage prompt optimization combined with self-consistency mechanisms is a cost-effective alternative to model fine-tuning for multifaceted clinical QA.
Related papers
- Task-Specific Multimodal Question Answering Agents via Confidence Calibration and Incremental Reasoning for QANTA 2026 [1.0742675209112622]
Quanta evaluates multimodal quizbowl systems that answer pyramid-style questions from incrementally revealed text and accompanying images.<n>The challenge consists of two distinct tasks: Tossup questions, which require deciding when to answer under uncertainty, and Bonus questions, which emphasize accurate answer selection and human adoption.<n>Our system achieved the highest overall leaderboard score of 0.402, including a Tossup score of 0.238 and a Bonus Effect score of 0.164.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-10T17:22:49Z) - ANCHOR: Autoregressive Non-intrusive Chunk-Ordered Refinement for Joint Multi-Resolution Speech Quality Modeling [62.983372215479925]
Streaming and generative systems require incremental estimation from partial audio.<n>We propose ANCHOR, reformulating incremental assessment as a multi-resolution autore task.<n> Experiments show substantial robustness under partial input, including a 48% PLCMOS error reduction on 2-second prefixes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-08T22:46:30Z) - ScientistOne: Towards Human-Level Autonomous Research via Chain-of-Evidence [57.37494162084001]
Chain-of-Evidence (CoE) is a verifiability framework requiring every claim to be traceable to its evidence source.<n>CoE Audit is a post-hoc audit whose four integrity checks -- score verification, specification violation, reference verification, and method-code alignment -- apply uniformly to all systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-25T21:30:27Z) - HealthNLP_Retrievers at ArchEHR-QA 2026: Cascaded LLM Pipeline for Grounded Clinical Question Answering [4.835744579415159]
This paper presents the system developed by the HealthNLP_Retrievers team for this task.<n>The proposed approach uses a multi-stage cascaded pipeline powered by the Gemini 2.5 Pro large language model.<n>Our architecture comprises four integrated modules: (1) a few-shot query reformulation unit which summarizes patient queries; (2) a verbose-based evidence scorer which ranks clinical sentences to recall; and (3) a grounded response generator which synthesizes professional-caliber answers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-29T16:47:20Z) - Tree-of-Evidence: Efficient "System 2" Search for Faithful Multimodal Grounding [1.6365003324232734]
We introduce Tree-of-Evidence (ToE), an inference-time search algorithm that frames interpretability as a discrete optimization problem.<n>ToE employs lightweight Evidence Bottlenecks that score coarse groups or units of data and performs a beam search to identify the compact evidence set required to reproduce the model's prediction.<n>Under sparse evidence budgets, ToE achieves higher decision agreement and lower probability fidelity error than other approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-09T01:28:14Z) - QU-NLP at ArchEHR-QA 2026: Two-Stage QLoRA Fine-Tuning of Qwen3-4B for Patient-Oriented Clinical Question Answering and Evidence Sentence Alignment [1.0152838128195467]
We present a unified system addressing both Subtask 3 (answer generation) and Subtask 4 (evidence sentence alignment) of the ArchEHR-QA Shared Task.<n>For Subtask 3, we apply two-stage Quantised Low-Rank Adaptation (QLoRA) to Qwen3-4B loaded in 4-bit NF4 quantisation.<n>For Subtask 4, we develop a weighted ensemble of three retrieval methods - BM25 with relative thresholding, TF-IDF cosine similarity, and a fine-tuned cross-encoder.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-26T11:24:13Z) - Automated Self-Testing as a Quality Gate: Evidence-Driven Release Management for LLM Applications [51.56484100374058]
We present an automated self-testing framework that introduces quality gates with evidence-based release decisions.<n>We evaluate the framework through a longitudinal case study of an internally deployed multi-agent conversational AI system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-13T20:44:15Z) - Eigen-1: Adaptive Multi-Agent Refinement with Monitor-Based RAG for Scientific Reasoning [53.45095336430027]
We develop a unified framework that combines implicit retrieval and structured collaboration.<n>On Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) Bio/Chem Gold, our framework achieves 48.3% accuracy.<n>Results on SuperGPQA and TRQA confirm robustness across domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-25T14:05:55Z) - Learning to Refine: Self-Refinement of Parallel Reasoning in LLMs [102.48588475875749]
We introduce Generative Self-Refinement (GSR), a novel parallel test-time scaling framework.<n>GSR generates a set of candidate responses in parallel and then performs self-refinement to synthesize a new superior solution.<n>We show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance across five mathematical benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-27T06:51:48Z) - PrismRAG: Boosting RAG Factuality with Distractor Resilience and Strategized Reasoning [57.89188317734747]
PrismRAG trains the model with distractor-aware QA pairs mixing gold evidence with subtle distractor passages.<n>It instills reasoning-centric habits that make the LLM plan, rationalize, and synthesize without relying on extensive human engineered instructions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-25T00:15:31Z) - SPARE: Single-Pass Annotation with Reference-Guided Evaluation for Automatic Process Supervision and Reward Modelling [58.05959902776133]
We introduce Single-Pass.<n>with Reference-Guided Evaluation (SPARE), a novel structured framework that enables efficient per-step annotation.<n>We demonstrate SPARE's effectiveness across four diverse datasets spanning mathematical reasoning (GSM8K, MATH), multi-hop question answering (MuSiQue-Ans), and spatial reasoning (SpaRP)<n>On ProcessBench, SPARE demonstrates data-efficient out-of-distribution generalization, using only $sim$16% of training samples compared to human-labeled and other synthetically trained baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-18T14:37:59Z) - Neural at ArchEHR-QA 2025: Agentic Prompt Optimization for Evidence-Grounded Clinical Question Answering [4.898784451149235]
We present Neural, the runner-up in the BioNLP 2025 Arch-QA shared task on evidence-grounded clinical QA.<n>Our proposed method decouples the task into (1) sentence-level evidence identification and (2) answer synthesis with explicit citations.<n>A self-consistency voting scheme further improves evidence recall without sacrificing precision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-12T14:36:18Z) - A Systematic Examination of Preference Learning through the Lens of Instruction-Following [83.71180850955679]
We use a novel synthetic data generation pipeline to generate 48,000 instruction unique-following prompts.<n>With our synthetic prompts, we use two preference dataset curation methods - rejection sampling (RS) and Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)<n>Experiments reveal that shared prefixes in preference pairs, as generated by MCTS, provide marginal but consistent improvements.<n>High-contrast preference pairs generally outperform low-contrast pairs; however, combining both often yields the best performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-18T15:38:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.