PRISM: : Planning and Reasoning with Intent in Simulated Embodied Environments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11534v1
• Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 04:59:47 GMT
• Title: PRISM: : Planning and Reasoning with Intent in Simulated Embodied Environments
• Abstract summary: Built on five multi-room apartments, PRISM structures 300 human-verified tasks into three capability tiers.<n>PRISM exposes an agent-agnostic executable action API that allows arbitrary agents to be evaluated end-to-end.
• Score: 59.07829883257003
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: When an LLM-based embodied agent fails at a household task, the culprit could be misidentified objects, forgotten sub-goals, or poor action sequencing -- yet existing benchmarks report only a single success rate, making it impossible to tell which cognitive module is responsible. We present PRISM, a diagnostic benchmark that reframes this problem: rather than asking only \textit{did the agent succeed?}, PRISM asks \textit{which capability is most likely responsible for failure?} Built on five photorealistic multi-room apartments (4--8 rooms each), PRISM structures 300 human-verified tasks into three capability tiers -- \textit{Basic Ability}, \textit{Reasoning Ability}, and \textit{Long-horizon Ability} -- that isolate perception-to-action grounding, implicit intent resolution, and sustained multi-step coordination respectively. PRISM exposes an agent-agnostic executable action API that allows arbitrary agents: LLM agents, VLM agents, symbolic planners, RL policies, and hybrid systems, to be evaluated end-to-end under the same benchmark protocol. To support deeper diagnosis, optional probes for perception, memory, and planning can be adopted, replaced, or bypassed entirely, enabling controlled component-level analysis when desired. Experiments on seven contemporary LLMs establish a clear hierarchy: explicit spatial grounding is not the dominant failure source under oracle perception, implicit intent resolution is a significant bottleneck for all model families, and long-horizon coordination exposes a stark capability cliff -- lightweight models collapse to as low as 20.0\% success while simultaneously consuming more tokens than their frontier counterparts, a signature of compensatory over-reasoning rather than genuine planning capability. Project page: \href{https://sj-li.com/PROJ/PRISM}{link}.

Related papers

• DCFA: Dual-view Causal-inspired Attribution for Failure Reasoning in LLM-based Multi-agent Systems [61.11435469308521]
  We propose DCFA, a training-free framework for failure attribution in large language model systems.<n> DCFA integrates a global module that constructs structured causal-inspired dependency graphs from system traces.<n>Experiments show that DCFA improves step-level accuracy by up to 8.27% over state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-04T05:29:31Z)
• Collective Counterfactual Planning: Coordination, Consent, and Verification under Representational Constraints [0.0]
  Groups routinely complete projects that no single member can plan, execute, or verify alone.<n>We propose a formal model of this phenomenon, Collective Counterfactual Planning (CCP), in which the binding limitation on each agent is neither capability, knowledge, nor observability.<n>A four-step exhaustive horizon-bounded solvability scheme is sound and complete under exact representation of the relay closure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-18T15:52:12Z)
• From Sequence to Structure: Relational Uncertainty Propagation for LLM Agents [75.69180947909148]
  We propose a trajectory-level UQ framework for large language model (LLM) agents.<n>RuPA represents an execution history as a directed trajectory graph in which reasoning states, tool interactions, and environment feedback are nodes connected by temporal and semantic dependency edges.<n>We evaluate RUPA on representative agent benchmarks, including $$-2, Terminal-Bench-2, and GAIA, using 6 open-source LLMs spanning multiple model families.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-17T01:40:14Z)
• Width, Memory, and Delay: A Resource Accounting for the Limits of Flat Multi-Agent Systems [27.425096016504174]
  A recent preprint argues that flat, homogeneous multi-agent systems face an irreducible, population-independent causal floor'' on achievable error.<n>We show this conclusion is too strong and replace it with a quantitative resource model built on three resources.<n>We quantify the price of replacing oracle knowledge of the disturbance spectrum with online learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-14T20:35:17Z)
• Position: A Three-Layer Probabilistic Assume-Guarantee Architecture Is Structurally Required for Safe LLM Agent Deployment [0.0]
  Three dimensions that jointly constitute safe operation: semantic intent and policy compliance, environmental validity, and dynamical feasibility.<n>We argue that the community must respond with a contract-based architecture in which each safety dimension is enforced by an independently certified layer.<n>We sketch such an architecture and derive the compositional system-level safety bounds it admits via the chain rule of probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T17:13:41Z)
• A2RBench: An Automatic Paradigm for Formally Verifiable Abstract Reasoning Benchmark Generation [59.98516959731531]
  Abstract reasoning ability reflects intelligence and capacity of LLMs to extract and apply abstract rules.<n>Existing benchmarks either rely on expensive manual annotation, limiting their scale, or risk measuring memorization rather than genuine reasoning.<n>We introduce an automated pipeline named A2RBench, encompassing generation, expansion, evaluation, and analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T06:14:20Z)
• PRTS: A Primitive Reasoning and Tasking System via Contrastive Representations [66.94988600664574]
  We present textbfPRTS (textbfPrimitive textbfReasoning and textbfTasking textbfSystem), a VLA foundation model that reformulates pretraining through Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T06:14:02Z)
• MAS-FIRE: Fault Injection and Reliability Evaluation for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems [38.44649280816596]
  We propose MAS-FIRE, a systematic framework for fault injection and reliability evaluation of Multi-Agent Systems.<n>We define a taxonomy of 15 fault types covering intra-agent cognitive errors and inter-agent coordination failures.<n>Applying MAS-FIRE to three representative MAS architectures, we uncover a rich set of fault-tolerant behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T13:47:43Z)
• FormalJudge: A Neuro-Symbolic Paradigm for Agentic Oversight [21.731032636844237]
  This paper proposes a neuro-symbolic framework that employs a bidirectional Formal-of-Thought architecture.<n>We validate across three benchmarks spanning behavioral safety, multi-domain constraint adherence, and agentic upward deception detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T18:48:11Z)
• Topology Matters: Measuring Memory Leakage in Multi-Agent LLMs [26.288357188171265]
  MAMA (Multi-Agent Memory Attack) is a framework that measures how network structure shapes leakage.<n>We quantify leakage as the fraction of ground-truth PII recovered from attacking agent outputs.<n>Results provide the first systematic mapping from architectural choices to measurable privacy risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T11:00:49Z)
• Diagnose, Localize, Align: A Full-Stack Framework for Reliable LLM Multi-Agent Systems under Instruction Conflicts [75.20929587906228]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-powered multi-agent systems (MAS) have rapidly advanced collaborative reasoning, tool use, and role-specialized coordination in complex tasks.<n>However, reliability-critical deployment remains hindered by a systemic failure mode: hierarchical compliance under instruction conflicts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T08:43:34Z)
• DRIFT: Dynamic Rule-Based Defense with Injection Isolation for Securing LLM Agents [52.92354372596197]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly central to agentic systems due to their strong reasoning and planning capabilities.<n>This interaction also introduces the risk of prompt injection attacks, where malicious inputs from external sources can mislead the agent's behavior.<n>We propose a Dynamic Rule-based Isolation Framework for Trustworthy agentic systems, which enforces both control and data-level constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T05:01:09Z)
• Which Agent Causes Task Failures and When? On Automated Failure Attribution of LLM Multi-Agent Systems [50.29939179830491]
  Failure attribution in LLM multi-agent systems remains underexplored and labor-intensive.<n>We develop and evaluate three automated failure attribution methods, summarizing their corresponding pros and cons.<n>The best method achieves 53.5% accuracy in identifying failure-responsible agents but only 14.2% in pinpointing failure steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T23:09:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.