DreamAvoid: Critical-Phase Test-Time Dreaming to Avoid Failures in VLA Policies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11750v1
• Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 08:27:16 GMT
• Title: DreamAvoid: Critical-Phase Test-Time Dreaming to Avoid Failures in VLA Policies
• Abstract summary: We propose DreamAvoid, a critical-phase test-time dreaming framework for Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models.<n>We also introduce an autonomous boundary learning paradigm to refine the system's understanding of the subtle boundary between success and failure.<n>The results demonstrate that DreamAvoid can effectively avoid failures, thereby improving the overall task success rate.
• Score: 65.27025563507961
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are often brittle in fine-grained manipulation, where minor action errors during the critical phases can rapidly escalate into irrecoverable failures. Since existing VLA models rely predominantly on successful demonstrations for training, they lack an explicit awareness of failure during these critical phases. To address this, we propose DreamAvoid, a critical-phase test-time dreaming framework that enables VLA models to anticipate and avoid failures. We also introduce an autonomous boundary learning paradigm to refine the system's understanding of the subtle boundary between success and failure. Specifically, we (1) utilize a Dream Trigger to determine whether the execution has entered a critical phase, (2) sample multiple candidate action chunks from the VLA via an Action Proposer, and (3) employ a Dream Evaluator, jointly trained on mixed data (success, failure, and boundary cases), to "dream" the short-horizon futures corresponding to the candidate actions, evaluate their values, and select the optimal action. We conduct extensive evaluations on real-world manipulation tasks and simulation benchmarks. The results demonstrate that DreamAvoid can effectively avoid failures, thereby improving the overall task success rate. Our code is available at https://github.com/XianzheFan/DreamAvoid.

Related papers

• FACT: Failure-Aware Causal Training for World-Action Models [20.123306787874828]
  Recent world-action models show that co-training policies with future prediction can provide physical priors for action generation.<n>We introduce FACT, a causal World-Action Model that predicts future video and task progress conditioned on the executed action.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-10T21:10:46Z)
• Foresight: Failure Detection for Long-Horizon Robotic Manipulation with Action-Conditioned World Model Latents [58.49879338545782]
  Long-horizon tasks are common in real-world robotic deployments, yet failure detection for such tasks remains underexplored.<n>We present Foresight, a failure detection framework that monitors manipulation trajectories using latent representations from an action-conditioned world model.<n>Our results suggest that action-conditioned world-model embeddings provide a scalable representation for reliable failure monitoring in long-horizon manipulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-22T09:32:28Z)
• Failing Forward: Adaptive Failure-Informed Learning for Vision-Language-Action Models [32.87104367896446]
  We propose an end-to-end framework that leverages failure trajectories as adaptive negative guidance for diffusion- and flow-based VLA policies.<n>AFIL uses a pretrained VLA to generate failure rollouts online, avoiding the need for handcrafted failure-mode design.<n>It then jointly trains Dual Action Generators (DAGs) for successful and failed behaviors while sharing a common vision-language backbone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T19:57:11Z)
• Unleashing VLA Potentials in Autonomous Driving via Explicit Learning from Failures [14.313346858887286]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models for autonomous driving often hit a performance plateau during Reinforcement Learning (RL) optimization.<n>This stagnation arises from exploration capabilities constrained by previous Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)<n>We propose Explicit Learning from Failures (ELF-VLA), a framework that augments RL with structured diagnostic feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-01T11:41:22Z)
• When Vision Overrides Language: Evaluating and Mitigating Counterfactual Failures in VLAs [31.92520697946991]
  Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) promise to ground language instructions in robot control, yet in practice often fail to faithfully follow language.<n>We show that counterfactual failures are prevalent yet underexplored across state-of-the-art VLAs.<n>We propose Counterfactual Action Guidance (CAG), a simple yet effective dual-branch inference scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T18:59:20Z)
• CycleVLA: Proactive Self-Correcting Vision-Language-Action Models via Subtask Backtracking and Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding [60.06899554269808]
  CycleVLA is a system that equips Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) with proactive self-correction.<n>CycleVLA achieves this by integrating a progress-aware VLA that flags critical subtask transition points.<n>Extensive experiments show that CycleVLA improves performance for both well-trained and under-trained VLAs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T17:31:01Z)
• Hierarchical Vision Language Action Model Using Success and Failure Demonstrations [60.82332413442677]
  We introduce VINE, a hierarchical vision-language-action model that separates high-level reasoning from low-level control.<n>System 2 performs feasibility-guided tree search over a 2D scene-graph abstraction.<n>System 1 executes low-level actions without modifying the agent's core skills.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T15:58:38Z)
• Guardian: Detecting Robotic Planning and Execution Errors with Vision-Language Models [53.20969621498248]
  We propose an automatic robot failure synthesis approach that procedurally perturbs successful trajectories to generate diverse planning and execution failures.<n>We construct three new failure detection benchmarks: RLBench-Fail, BridgeDataV2-Fail, and UR5-Fail.<n>We then train Guardian, a VLM with multi-view images for detailed failure reasoning and detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T17:57:27Z)
• AttackVLA: Benchmarking Adversarial and Backdoor Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models [60.39655329875822]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models enable robots to interpret natural-language instructions and perform diverse tasks.<n>Despite growing interest in attacking such models, the effectiveness of existing techniques remains unclear.<n>We propose AttackVLA, a unified framework that aligns with the VLA development lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-15T10:30:46Z)
• Learning Affordances at Inference-Time for Vision-Language-Action Models [50.93181349331096]
  In robotics, Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) offer a promising path towards solving complex control tasks.<n>We introduce Learning from Inference-Time Execution (LITEN), which connects a VLA low-level policy to a high-level VLM that conditions on past experiences.<n>Our approach iterates between a reasoning phase that generates and executes plans for the low-level VLA, and an assessment phase that reflects on the resulting execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T16:43:29Z)
• Validity Learning on Failures: Mitigating the Distribution Shift in Autonomous Vehicle Planning [2.3558144417896583]
  The planning problem constitutes a fundamental aspect of the autonomous driving framework. We propose Validity Learning on Failures, VL(on failure) as a remedy to address this issue. We show that VL(on failure) outperforms the state-of-the-art methods by a large margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T17:25:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.