ProfiliTable: Profiling-Driven Tabular Data Processing via Agentic Workflows

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12376v1
• Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 16:42:38 GMT
• Title: ProfiliTable: Profiling-Driven Tabular Data Processing via Agentic Workflows
• Abstract summary: ProfiliTable is an autonomous multi-agent framework centered on dynamic profiling.<n>It constructs and iteratively refines a unified execution context through interactive exploration, knowledge-augmented synthesis, and feedback-driven refinement.
• Score: 17.525508735432147
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Table processing-including cleaning, transformation, augmentation, and matching-is a foundational yet error-prone stage in real-world data pipelines. While recent LLM-based approaches show promise for automating such tasks, they often struggle in practice due to ambiguous instructions, complex task structures, and the lack of structured feedback, resulting in syntactically correct but semantically flawed code. To address these challenges, we propose ProfiliTable, an autonomous multi-agent framework centered on dynamic profiling, which constructs and iteratively refines a unified execution context through interactive exploration, knowledge-augmented synthesis, and feedback-driven refinement. ProfiliTable integrates (i) a Profiler that performs ReAct-style data exploration to build semantic understanding, (ii) a Generator that retrieves curated operators to synthesize task-aware code, and (iii) an Evaluator-Summarizer loop that injects execution scores and diagnostic insights to enable closed-loop refinement. Extensive experiments on a diverse benchmark covering 18 tabular task types demonstrate that ProfiliTable consistently outperforms strong baselines, particularly in complex multi-step scenarios. These results highlight the critical role of dynamic profiling in reliably translating ambiguous user intents into robust and governance-compliant table transformations.

Related papers

• From Profiling to Synthesis: Benchmarking Implicit Behavioral Alignment in Personalized LLM Agents [56.187590188698955]
  Large Language Models have enabled increasingly capable autonomous agents, yet personalization remains critical for making such agents practically useful.<n>Recent benchmarks have begun evaluating personalization in agents, but they largely rely on static preference snapshots, fixed interaction logs, or question answering over predefined user profiles.<n>We introduce IBA-Bench, a benchmark for implicit behavioral alignment constructed from longitudinal interaction histories.<n>We propose IBA-Agent, an agent framework that reconciles conflicting priorities through broad retrieval and trajectory-level alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T12:52:04Z)
• VADAOrchestra: Neurosymbolic Orchestration of Adaptive Reasoning Workflows [47.70653885737167]
  Decision-making in real-world settings rarely follows a fixed script. Instead, it unfolds as a dynamic reasoning process.<n>We introduce VADAOrchestra, a neurosymbolic framework that models complex as evolving reasoning processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-21T13:10:48Z)
• Adaptive Multimodal Agents-Based Framework for Automatic Workflow Execution [1.2132786136735432]
  We propose a novel multi-agent framework that achieves automatic workflow execution through a distinct two-phase pipeline.<n>During inference, agents leverage Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) over this fixed, pre-established graph.<n>We validate our framework in a real-world context, demonstrating its ability to maintain high reliability and semantic awareness even with limited training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T15:23:22Z)
• RoboAgent: Chaining Basic Capabilities for Embodied Task Planning [46.248451288196435]
  This paper focuses on embodied task planning, where an agent acquires visual observations from the environment and executes atomic actions to accomplish a given task.<n>We propose RoboAgent, a capability-driven planning pipeline in which the model actively invokes different sub-capabilities.<n>We use a multi-stage paradigm that consists of: (1) behavior cloning with expert plans, (2) DAgger training using trajectories collected by the model, and (3) reinforcement learning guided by an expert policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T04:01:27Z)
• Autonomous Data Processing using Meta-Agents [2.3732259124656907]
  We present textbfAutonomous Data Processing using Meta-agents (ADP-MA), a framework that dynamically constructs, executes, and iteratively refines data processing pipelines.<n> ADP-MA emphasizes context-aware optimization, adaptive workload partitioning, and progressive sampling for scalability.<n>We demonstrate ADP-MA through an interactive demo that showcases pipeline construction, execution monitoring, and adaptive refinement across representative data processing tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T20:58:17Z)
• FABRIC: Framework for Agent-Based Realistic Intelligence Creation [3.940391073007047]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as agents, expected to decompose goals, invoke tools, and verify results in dynamic environments.<n>We present a unified framework for synthesizing agentic data using only LLMs, without any human-in-the-loop supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T18:20:22Z)
• CoT Referring: Improving Referring Expression Tasks with Grounded Reasoning [67.18702329644526]
  CoT Referring enhances model reasoning across modalities through a structured, chain-of-thought training data structure.<n>We restructure the training data to enforce a new output form, providing new annotations for existing datasets.<n>We also integrate detection and segmentation capabilities into a unified MLLM framework, training it with a novel adaptive weighted loss to optimize performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-03T08:50:21Z)
• ToolACE-MT: Non-Autoregressive Generation for Agentic Multi-Turn Interaction [84.90394416593624]
  Agentic task-solving with Large Language Models (LLMs) requires multi-turn, multi-step interactions.<n>Existing simulation-based data generation methods rely heavily on costly autoregressive interactions between multiple agents.<n>We propose a novel Non-Autoregressive Iterative Generation framework, called ToolACE-MT, for constructing high-quality multi-turn agentic dialogues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-18T07:38:23Z)
• Structured Prompting and Feedback-Guided Reasoning with LLMs for Data Interpretation [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding and task generalization.<n>This paper introduces the STROT Framework, a method for structured prompting and feedback-driven transformation logic generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-03T00:05:01Z)
• Learning Task Representations from In-Context Learning [67.66042137487287]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in in-context learning (ICL)<n>We introduce an automated formulation for encoding task information in ICL prompts as a function of attention heads.<n>The proposed method successfully extracts task-specific information from in-context demonstrations and excels in both text and regression tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T00:16:44Z)
• Benchmarking Agentic Workflow Generation [80.74757493266057]
  We introduce WorfBench, a unified workflow generation benchmark with multi-faceted scenarios and intricate graph workflow structures.<n>We also present WorfEval, a systemic evaluation protocol utilizing subsequence and subgraph matching algorithms.<n>We observe that the generated can enhance downstream tasks, enabling them to achieve superior performance with less time during inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T12:41:19Z)
• Automated Concatenation of Embeddings for Structured Prediction [75.44925576268052]
  We propose Automated Concatenation of Embeddings (ACE) to automate the process of finding better concatenations of embeddings for structured prediction tasks. We follow strategies in reinforcement learning to optimize the parameters of the controller and compute the reward based on the accuracy of a task model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-10T14:03:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.