Task-Aware Automated User Profile Generation for Recommendation Simulation Using Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.13497v1
• Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 13:20:39 GMT
• Title: Task-Aware Automated User Profile Generation for Recommendation Simulation Using Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: This work proposes an Automated Profile Generation Framework for Recommendation Simulation, APG4RecSim.<n>APG4RecSim constructs realistic, coherent, and robust user profiles with minimal supervision.<n>Our results show that profiles generated by APG4RecSim are resilient to popularity- and position-induced biases.
• Score: 8.706093337738869
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM)-based agent simulation has emerged as a promising approach to meet the increasing demand for real-time and rigorous evaluation in modern recommender systems. A typical LLM-driven simulation framework comprises three essential components: the profile module, memory module, and action module. However, existing studies have primarily concentrated on enhancing the memory and action modules, with limited attention to profile generation, which plays a pivotal role in ensuring realistic agent behaviours and aligning simulated interactions with real user dynamics. Moreover, the scarcity of datasets specifically designed for recommendation simulations has led to heavy reliance on manually crafted profiles, significantly limiting the scalability and generalisability of simulation frameworks across different datasets. To address these challenges, this work proposes an Automated Profile Generation Framework for Recommendation Simulation, APG4RecSim, that constructs realistic, coherent, and robust user profiles with minimal supervision. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets demonstrate that APG4RecSim achieves the best overall performance on discrimination, ranking, and rating tasks, improving ranking quality by up to 7% in nDCG@10 and reducing rating distribution divergence by 8% in JSD compared to existing profile-generation baselines. Beyond overall performance gains, our results show that profiles generated by APG4RecSim are resilient to popularity- and position-induced biases and maintain stable performance across datasets and different LLMs.

Related papers

• Toward Visually Realistic Simulation: A Benchmark for Evaluating Robot Manipulation in Simulation [62.51953630639423]
  Existing benchmarks lack visual realism, creating a large domain gap between simulation and reality.<n>We propose VISER, a visually realistic benchmark for evaluating robot manipulation in simulation.<n>VISER features a high-fidelity dataset of over 1,000 3D assets with physically-based rendering (PBR) materials, along with 3D scenes created from these assets through curated layouts or generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T14:13:05Z)
• Aligning Agents via Planning: A Benchmark for Trajectory-Level Reward Modeling [19.766968596602457]
  Plan-RewardBench is a trajectory-level preference benchmark designed to evaluate how well judges distinguish preferred versus distractor agent trajectories.<n>Plan-RewardBench covers four representative task families -- (i) Safety Refusal, (ii) Tool-Irrelevance / Unavailability, (iii) Complex Planning, and (iv) Robust Error Recovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T12:35:06Z)
• RealUserSim: Bridging the Reality Gap in Agent Benchmarking via Grounded User Simulation [43.758401022409465]
  RealUserSim is the first user simulation framework grounded in real behavioral data.<n>From 14,000+ authentic human-LLM conversations (WildChat), we extract 7,275 executable behavioral profiles.<n>A fidelity benchmark (PT3) on 600 conversations across 71+ domains with anti-leakage controls shows that grounded simulation raises match rate from 24.2% to 45.3%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-07T19:42:36Z)
• Mind the Sim2Real Gap in User Simulation for Agentic Tasks [101.69142591891234]
  We formalize the Sim2Real gap in user simulation and present the first study running the full $$-bench protocol with real humans.<n> Behaviorally, LLM simulators are excessively cooperative, stylistically uniform, and lack realistic frustration or ambiguity.<n>These findings highlight the importance of human validation when using LLM-based user simulators in the agent development cycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T19:12:31Z)
• Can Recommender Systems Teach Themselves? A Recursive Self-Improving Framework with Fidelity Control [82.30868101940068]
  We propose a paradigm in which a model bootstraps its own performance without reliance on external data or teacher models.<n>Our theoretical analysis shows that RSIR acts as a data-driven implicit regularizer, smoothing the optimization landscape.<n>We show that even smaller models benefit, and weak models can generate effective training curricula for stronger ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-17T15:31:32Z)
• One Model to Critique Them All: Rewarding Agentic Tool-Use via Efficient Reasoning [54.580646706013965]
  Reward models (RMs) play a critical role in aligning large language models with human preferences.<n>We introduce ToolRM, a family of lightweight generative RMs tailored for general tool-use scenarios.<n>To build these models, we propose a novel pipeline that constructs pairwise preference data using rule-based scoring and multidimensional sampling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T06:08:27Z)
• SimBench: Benchmarking the Ability of Large Language Models to Simulate Human Behaviors [58.87134689752605]
  We introduce SimBench, the first large-scale, standardized benchmark for a robust, reproducible science of LLM simulation.<n>We show that even the best LLMs today have limited simulation ability (score: 40.80/100), performance scales log-linearly with model size.<n>We demonstrate that simulation ability correlates most strongly with deep, knowledge-intensive reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T13:14:38Z)
• Sample-Efficient Online Learning in LM Agents via Hindsight Trajectory Rewriting [92.57796055887995]
  We introduce ECHO, a prompting framework that adapts hindsight experience replay from reinforcement learning for language model agents.<n> ECHO generates optimized trajectories for alternative goals that could have been achieved during failed attempts.<n>We evaluate ECHO on stateful versions of XMiniGrid, a text-based navigation and planning benchmark, and PeopleJoinQA, a collaborative information-gathering enterprise simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T18:11:09Z)
• Large Language Models as Virtual Survey Respondents: Evaluating Sociodemographic Response Generation [18.225151370273093]
  This paper explores a new paradigm: simulating virtual survey respondents using Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We introduce two novel simulation settings, namely Partial Attribute Simulation (PAS) and Full Attribute Simulation (FAS)<n>We curate a comprehensive benchmark suite, LLM-S3 (Large Language Model-based Sociodemographic Simulation Survey), that spans 11 real-world public datasets across four sociological domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T04:59:00Z)
• Diagnostic-Guided Dynamic Profile Optimization for LLM-based User Simulators in Sequential Recommendation [15.61963892566877]
  DGDPO is a novel framework that constructs user profile through a dynamic and iterative optimization process.<n>Unlike existing LLM-based user simulators that are limited to single-round interactions, we are the first to integrate DGDPO with sequential recommenders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-18T06:17:59Z)
• Investigating the Robustness of Counterfactual Learning to Rank Models: A Reproducibility Study [71.04084063541777]
  Counterfactual learning to rank has attracted extensive attention in the IR community.<n>Models can be theoretically unbiased when the user behavior assumption is correct and the propensity estimation is accurate.<n>Their effectiveness is usually empirically evaluated via simulation-based experiments due to a lack of widely available, large-scale, real click logs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T10:54:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.