Beyond Anthropomorphism: Exploring the Roles of Perceived Non-humanity and Structural Similarity in Deep Self-Disclosure Toward Generative AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.13574v1
• Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 14:10:07 GMT
• Title: Beyond Anthropomorphism: Exploring the Roles of Perceived Non-humanity and Structural Similarity in Deep Self-Disclosure Toward Generative AI
• Abstract summary: Perceived non-humanity may reduce evaluation apprehension.<n> structural similarity refers to the perceived logical alignment between a user's thinking and AI responses.<n>Findings suggest that trust-related behavior in deep self-disclosure may involve factors other than anthropomorphic perception.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This study investigates deep self-disclosure toward generative AI by examining perceived non-humanity and structural similarity as psychological factors beyond anthropomorphism. Perceived non-humanity may reduce evaluation apprehension, whereas structural similarity refers to the perceived logical alignment between a user's thinking and AI responses. Using cross-sectional survey data from 2,400 participants collected in 2025, this study analyzed associations with both the occurrence and depth of self-disclosure. Logistic regression indicated that the group high in both perceptions (Segment D) showed a significantly higher likelihood of disclosure than the baseline group (Segment A; OR = 11.35). ANOVA further showed significant between-group differences in disclosure depth. The findings suggest that trust-related behavior in deep self-disclosure may involve factors other than anthropomorphic perception. Because the study is exploratory and based on self-reported survey data, the results should be interpreted as associative rather than causal, and future longitudinal or experimental research is needed.

Related papers

• Before the Action: Benchmarking LLMs on Prospective Hypothesis Discovery [95.44432473367836]
  Large language models (LLMs) excel at answering pre-specified questions, yet their ability to navigate the open-ended, pre-conclusion stage of discovery remains largely unmeasured.<n>We introduce Prospective Hypothesis Discovery (PHD), which asks models to autonomously construct grounded, discnative, and testable hypothesis spaces from inconclusive evidence.<n>We introduce HypoArena, comprising HypoData, a benchmark of 988 cases across six scientific and analytical domains, and HypoEval, an evaluation framework for open-ended hypothesis sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-17T08:56:43Z)
• CausalAffect: Causal Discovery for Facial Affective Understanding [26.904783570786773]
  CausalAffect is the first framework for causal graph discovery in facial affect analysis.<n>Our approach requires neither jointly annotated datasets nor handcrafted causal priors.<n>All trained models and source code will be released upon acceptance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-29T12:07:33Z)
• Hypothesis Hunting with Evolving Networks of Autonomous Scientific Agents [52.50038914857797]
  We term this process hypothesis hunting: the cumulative search for insight through sustained exploration across vast and complex hypothesis spaces.<n>We introduce AScience, a framework modeling discovery as the interaction of agents, networks, and evaluation norms, and implement it as ASCollab.<n> Experiments show that such social dynamics enable the accumulation of expert-rated results along the diversity-quality-novelty frontier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T08:47:07Z)
• Neural network embeddings recover value dimensions from psychometric survey items on par with human data [7.5591367381052175]
  "Survey and Questionnaire Item Embeddings Differentials" (SQuID) is a novel methodological approach that enables neural network embeddings to recover latent dimensions from psychometric survey items.<n>We demonstrate that embeddings derived from large language models, when processed with SQuID, can recover the structure of human values obtained from human rater judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T15:14:54Z)
• Investigating VLM Hallucination from a Cognitive Psychology Perspective: A First Step Toward Interpretation with Intriguing Observations [60.63340688538124]
  Hallucination is a long-standing problem that has been actively investigated in Vision-Language Models (VLMs)<n>Existing research commonly attributes hallucinations to technical limitations or sycophancy bias, where the latter means the models tend to generate incorrect answers to align with user expectations.<n>In this work, we introduce a psychological taxonomy, categorizing VLMs' cognitive biases that lead to hallucinations, including sycophancy, logical inconsistency, and a newly identified VLMs behaviour: appeal to authority.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T19:03:16Z)
• Practical Guide for Causal Pathways and Sub-group Disparity Analysis [1.8974791957167259]
  We use causal disparity analysis to quantify and examine the causal interplay between sensitive attributes and outcomes. Our two-step investigation focuses on datasets where race serves as the sensitive attribute. We demonstrate that the sub-groups identified by our approach to be affected the most by disparities are the ones with the largest ML classification errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T22:51:01Z)
• Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach [61.04606493712002]
  Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in unverifiable claims that is not observable. Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported beliefs. We propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T07:22:56Z)
• Self-Emotion-Mediated Exploration in Artificial Intelligence Mirrors: Findings from Cognitive Psychology [0.08739101659113153]
  This study proposes a learning framework for artificial agents to obtain an intrinsic exploratory drive.<n>Data analysis scores dictate pride or surprise, in accordance with psychological studies on humans.<n>Results: Causal relationships between states and exploration are demonstrated by the majority of agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T18:20:44Z)
• Interventional Causal Representation Learning [75.18055152115586]
  Causal representation learning seeks to extract high-level latent factors from low-level sensory data. Can interventional data facilitate causal representation learning? We show that interventional data often carries geometric signatures of the latent factors' support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-24T04:59:03Z)
• ACRE: Abstract Causal REasoning Beyond Covariation [90.99059920286484]
  We introduce the Abstract Causal REasoning dataset for systematic evaluation of current vision systems in causal induction. Motivated by the stream of research on causal discovery in Blicket experiments, we query a visual reasoning system with the following four types of questions in either an independent scenario or an interventional scenario. We notice that pure neural models tend towards an associative strategy under their chance-level performance, whereas neuro-symbolic combinations struggle in backward-blocking reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-26T02:42:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.